Abstract
The potential and limitations of life cycle assessment and environmental systems analysis tools in general are evaluated. More specifically this is done by exploring the limits of what can be shown by LCA and other tools. This is done from several perspectives. First, experiences from current LCAs and methodology discussions are used including a discussion on the type of impacts typically included, quality of inventory data, methodological choices in relation to time aspects, allocation, characterisation and weighting methods and uncertainties in describing the real world. Second, conclusions from the theory of science are practised. It is concluded that it can in general not be shown that one product is environmentally preferable to another one, even if this happens to be the case. This conclusion has important policy implications. If policy changes require that it must be shown that one product is more (or less) environmentally preferable before any action can be taken, then it is likely that no action is ever going to take place. If we want changes to be made, decisions must be taken on a less rigid basis. It is expected that in this decision making process, LCA can be a useful input. Since it is the only tool that can be used for product comparisons over the whole life cycle, it can not be replaced by any other tool and should be used. Increased harmonisation of LCA methodology may increase the acceptability of chosen methods and increase the usefulness of the tool.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anonymous (1992): Product Life-Cycle Assessment — Principles and Methodology. Nord 1992:9, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark
Anonymous (1997): Life-Cycle Assessment and Conceptually Related Programmes. Report of the SETAC-Europe Working Group. SETAC-Europe, Brussels, Belgium
Ayres, R.U. (1995): Life-cycle analysis: A critique. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 14, 199–223
Baumann, H. (1996): LCA Use in Swedish Industry. Int. J. LCA, 1, 122–126. Also in Baumann (1998)
Baumann, H. (1998): Life-Cycle Assessment and Decision Making — theories and practises. PhD thesis. Technical Environmental Planning, Chalmers, Goteborg, Sweden
Berkhout, F.;Howes, R. (1997): The adoption of life-cycle approaches by industry: patterns and impacts. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 20, 71–94
Boustead, I. (1994): Eco-profiles of the European polymer industry. Report 5: Co-product allocation in chlorine plants. APME, Brussels, Belgium
Chalmers, A.F. (1982): What is this thing called Science? 2nd Ed. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK
Consou, F.;Allen, D.;Boustead, I.;Fava, J.;Frankiin, W.;Jensen, A.A.;de Oude, N.;Parrish, R.;Perriman, R.;Postlehwarre, D.;Quay, B.;Séguin, J.;Vigon, B. (1993): Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: A Code of Practise’. SETAC-Europe, Brussels, Belgium
Copius Peereboom, E.;Kleijn, R.;Lemkowitz, S.;Lundie, S. (1999): Influence of Inventory Data Sets on Life- Cycle Assessment Results: A Case Study on PVC. J. of Industrial Ecology, 2 (3), 109–130
Curran, M.A. (1997): Life-Cycle Based Government Policies. A Survey. Int. J. LCA, 2, 39–43
Ehrenfeld, J.R. (1998): The Importance of LCAs — Warts and All. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1(2), 41–49
Ekvall, T. (1996): Key issues in the assessment of wood fibre flows. Report 1996:1, CIT ekologik, Göteborg, Sweden
Ekvall, T.;baumann, H.;Svensson, G.;Rydberg, T.;Tillman, A-M. (1992): Life-cycle assessment: Pilot study on inventory methodology and data bases. In Anonymous (1992), 132–171
Elkington, J. (1993): The uses and abuses of life-cycle analyses by non-governmental organizations. J. Cleaner Prod., 1, 151–153
Finnveden, G. (1992): Landfilling — a forgotten part of Life-Cycle Assessment. In Anonymous (1992), 263–280
Finnveden, G. (1994): Methods for Describing and Characterising Resource Depletion in the Context of Life-Cycle Assessment. IVL Report B1141
Finnveden, G. (1996a): Solid waste treatment within the framework of life-cycle assessment — Metals in municipal solid waste landfills. Int. J. LCA, 1, 74–78
Finnveden, G. (1996b): “Resources” and related impact categories. In Udo de Haes (1996), 39–48
Finnveden, G. (1997a): Letter to the Editor, Comment on “Life-Cycle Assessment Study on Resilient Floor Coverings”. Int. J. LCA, 2, 185–186
Finnveden, G. (1997b): Valuation methods within LCA — Where are the values? Int. J. LCA, 2, 163–169
Finnveden, G. (1998a): On the Possibilities of Life-Cycle Assessment, Development of methodology and review of case studies. PhD thesis. Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, Stcokholm, Sweden
Finnveden, G. (1998b): Characterisation of Resources by Exergy Consumption or Entropy Production — The Thermodynamic Approach. Presentation at the 8th SETAC-Europe, Bordeaux. In preparation
Finnveden, G. (1999): Methodological aspects of life cycle assessment of integrated solid waste management systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 26, 173–187
Finnveden, G.;Ekvall, T. (1998): Life-Cycle Assessment as a Decision-Support Tool — The Case of Recycling vs. Incineration of Paper. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 24, 235–256
Finnveden, G.;Huppes, G. (Eds.) (1995): Life-Cycle Assessment and Treatment of Solid Waste. Proceedings of the International Workshop, September 28–29, 1995, Stockholm, Sweden. AFR-Report 98. AFR, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden
Finnveden, G.;Lindfors, L-G. (1998): Data Quality of Life-Cycle Inventory Data — Rules of Thumb. Letter to the editor. Int. J. LCA, 3, 65–66
Finnveden, G.;östlund, P. (1997): Exergies of Natural Resources in Life-Cycle Assessment and Other Applications. Energy, 22, 923–931
Finnveden, G.;Lindfors, L-G.;Wennberg. L. (1996): Alternativa material till PVC. Inventering och analys av genomförda livscykelanalyser mm avseende jämförelser av PVC och alternativa material för olika produktgnipper. IVL Rapport B1232. (In Swedish)
Finnveden, G.;Albertsson, A.C.;Berendson, J.;Eriksson, E.;Hoglund, L.O.;Karlsson, S.;Sundqvist, J-O. (1995): Solid waste treatment within the framework of life-cycle assessment. J. Cleaner Prod., 3, 189–199
Finnveden, G.;Anderson-Sköld, Y.;Samuelsson, M-O.;Zetterberg, L.;Lindfors, L-G. (1992): Classification (Impact Analysis) in Connection with Life-Cycle Assessment — A Preliminary Study. In Anonymous (1992), 172–231
Frischknecht, R. (1997): Goal and Scope Definition and Inventory Analysis. In Udo de Haes and Wrisberg, N. (1997), 59–88
Frischknecht, R. (1998): Life-Cycle Inventory Analysis for Decision-Making. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich, Diss. ETH Nr 12599. ESU-Services, Uster, Switzerland
Funtowicz, S.O.;Ravetz, J.R. (1994): Uncertainty, complexity and post-normal science. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 13, 1881–1885
Grotz, S.;Scholl, G. (1996): Application of LCA in German Industry — Results of a Survey. Int. J. LCA, 1, 226–230
Guinée, J.;Heijungs, R. (1995): A proposal for the definition of resource equivalency factors for use in product Life-Cycle Assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 14, 917–925
Günther, A.;Langowski, H.C. (1997): Life-Cycle Assessment Study on Resilient Floor Coverings. Int. J. LCA, 2, 73–80
Heijungs, R.;Guinée, J.B.;Huppes, G.;Lankreijer, R.M.;Udo de Haes, H.A.;Wegener Sleeswijk, A.;Ansems, A.M.M.;Eggels, P.G.;van Duin, R.;de Goede, H.P. (1992): Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment of Products. Guide and Backgrounds. CML, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
Heijungs, R. (1997): Economic Drama and the Environmental Stage. Formal derivation of algorithmic tools for environmental analysis and decision-support from a unified epistemological principle. PhD thesis. CML, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
Heijungs, R. (1998): Towards Eco-efficiency with LCAs Prevention Principle: an Epistemological Foundation of LCA Using Axioms. In Klostermann, J.E.M. and Tukker, A. (Eds.): Product Innovation and Eco-efficiency, Twenty-three Industry Efforts to Reach the Factor 4. Kluwer Academic Publishers
Heijungs, R.;Guinée, J.;Huppes, G. (1997a): Questions in LCA and the goal definition; discussion note for the meeting of the Thinktank. Letter to the international observers of the Dutch methodology project. CML, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
Heijuncs, R.;Guinée, J.;Huppes, G. (1997b): Impact categories for natural resources and land use. CML report 138. CML, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
Hofstetter, P. (1998): Perspectives in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. A Structured Approach to Combine Models of the Technosphere, Ecosphere and Valuesphere. Kluwer Academic Publishers
Huijbregts, M.A.J. (1998): A General Framework for the Analysis of Uncertainty and Variability in Life Cycle Assessment. Int. J. LCA, 3, 273–280
Huppes, G.;Schneider, F. (Eds.) (1994): Proceedings of the European Workshop on Allocation in LCA, 24-25 Feb., 1994, CML, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISO (1997): Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework. International Standard ISO 14040
ISO (1998a): Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. International Standard ISO 14041
ISO (1998b): Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Life cycle impact assessment. Draft Internation Standard ISO/DIS 14042
Krozer, J.;Vis, J.C. (1998): How to get LCA in the right direction? J. Cleaner Prod., 6, 53–61
Lindfors, L-G.;Christiansen, K.;Hoffman, L.;Virtanen, Y.;Juntilla, V.;Hanssen, O.J.;Rönntng, A.;Ekvall, T.;Finnveden, G. (1995a): Nordic Guidelines on Life-Cycle Assessment. Nord 1995:20. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark
Lindfors, L-G.;Christiansen, K.;Hoffman, L.;Virtanen, Y.;Juntilla, V.;Hanssen, O.J.;Rönning, A.;Ekvall, T.;Finnveden, G. (1995b): LCA-Nordic, Technical Report No 10. Tema Nord 1995:502. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark
Moberg ;Finnveden, G.;Johansson, J.;Steen, P. (1999): Miljösystemanalytiska verktyg — en introduktion med koppling till beslutssituationer. AFR-report 251. AFR, Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm
Naturvårdsverket (1998): Producentansvar för förpackningar; för miljöns skull? Rapport 4938. Swedish EPA, Stockholm, Sweden
öman, C. (1998): Emissions of organic compounds from landfills. PhD thesis. Div. of Land and Water Resources, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. Also available as AFR report 193
Quade, E.S.;Miser, H.J. (1985): The Context, Nature, and Use of Systems Analysis. In Miser, H.J. and Quade, E.S. (Eds.): Handbook of Systems Analysis, Vol.1, pp. 1–32. John Wiley & Sons
Sundqvist, J.-O.;Finnveden, G.;Albertsson, A.-C.;Karlsson, S.;Berendson, J.;Eriksson, E.;Höclund, L.O. (1994): Life Cycle Assessment and Solid Waste. AFR-Report 29. AFR, Stockholm, Sweden
Sundqvist, J.-O.;Finnveden, G.;Stripple, H.;Albertsson, A.-C.;Karlsson, S.;Berendson, J.;HOglund, L.O. (1997): Life Cycle Assessment and Solid Waste — stage 2. AFR-Report 173, AFR, Swedish EPA, Stockholm, Sweden
Tillman , A-M. (1998): Significance of decision making for LCA methodology. Key note lecture at the 8th annual meeting of SETAC-Europe, 1998m, Bordeaux. Technical Environmental Planning, Chalmers, Göteborg, Sweden
Tukker, A. (1998): Frames in the Toxicity Controversy. Risk Assessment and Policy Analysis Related to the Dutch Chlorine Debate and the Swedish PVC-Debate. PhD Thesis. To be published by Kluwer
Udo de Haes, H.A. (1993): Applications of life-cycle assessment: expectations, drawbacks and perspectives. J. Cleaner Prod., 1, 131–137
Udo de Haes, H.A. (Ed.) (1996): Towards a methodology for life-cycle impact assessment. SETAC-Europe, Brussels, Belgium
Udo de Haes, H.A. (1998): LCA Can Be Very Relaxed.… Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1 (4), 3–5
Udo de Haes, H.A.;Wrisberg, N. (1997): Life-Cycle Assessment: State-of-the-Art and Research Priorities — Results of LCANET, a Concerted Action in the Environment and Climate Programme (DGXII). LCA Documents Vol. 1. Eco-Informa Press, Bayreuth, Germany
Udo de Haes, H.A.;Jolliet, O.;Finnveden, G.;Hauschild, M.;Krewnt, W.;Müller-Wenk, R. (1999): Best Available Practise Regarding Impact Categories and Category Indicators in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Background Document for the Second Working Group on Life Cycle Impact Assessment of SETAC-Europe (WIA-2). Part 1 and 2. Int. J. LCA, 4, 66–74 and 167-174
Vigon, B.W.;Tolle, D.A.;Cornaby, B.W.;Latham, H.C.;Harrison, C.L.;Boguski, T.L.;Hunt, R.G.;Sellers, J.D. (1993): Life-Cycle Assessment: Inventory Guidelines and Principles, EPA/600/R-92/245. USEPA, Washington DC
Weidema, B. (1998): Application Typologies for Life Cycle Assessment. Int. J. LCA, 3, 237–240
Weidema, B.P.;Frees, N.;Nielsen, A-M. (1999): Marginal production technologies for life-cycle inventories. Int. J. LCA, 4, 48–56
Wenzel, H.;Hauschild, M.;Alting, L. (1997): Environmental Assessment of Products. Vol. 1. Chapman and Hall, London
Wikström, E.;Löfvenius, G.;Rappe, C.;Marklund, S. (1996): Influence of Level and Form of Chlorine on the Formation of Chlorinated Dioxins, Dibenzofurans, and Benzenes during Combustion of an Artificial Fuel in a Laboratory Reactor. Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 1637–1644
Wrisberg, N.;Gameson T. (Eds.) (1998): CHAINET Definition Document. CML, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Finnveden, G. On the limitations of life cycle assessment and environmental systems analysis tools in general. Int. J. LCA 5, 229–238 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979365
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979365