Abstract
It is common to have numerous alternatives and conditions that remain uncertain, but these need to be assessed in decision-making processes. Investigators introduce decision-makers’ anticipations and assumptions into analysis when building strategies as a form of scenario. In such a way, scenario analysis is often used as a powerful vehicle for decision making. While a number of LCA case studies dealing with scenarios have been performed, structured frameworks integrating LCA with scenario analysis methodologies have not yet been established. In this paper, we first propose a general framework for scenario-based LCA. The framework provides retrospective and prospective studies with a clear structure. The most important characteristic of the structure is the recognition and separation of three modeling processes, lifecycle modeling, scenario modeling, and valuation modeling, to aim at an increase in reviewability of the entire study and reusability of the constructed models. Next, we introduce a tool, termed lifecycle modeling language (LCML), developed for modeling lifecycle systems and valuation procedures with its relevant scenarios within the proposed framework. LCML facilitates accumulating knowledge obtained from scenario-based LCA studies, by reusing the constructed models, or by applying the same patterns identified from the LCML description, and contributes to reducing the time and efforts needed for an investigation. An illustrative example is presented to show the functionality of LCML.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Duncan TM, Reimer JA (1998): Chemical Engineering Design and Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gamma E, Helm R, Johnson R, Vlissides J (1995): Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Addison-Wesley, Reading
Himmelblau DM, Bischoff KB (1968): Process Analysis and Simulation: Deterministic Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York
Hojer M, Mattsson LG (2000): Determinism and backcasting in future studies. Futures 32 613–634
ISO 14040 (1997) Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework. ISO 14040:1997(E) International Organisation of Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland
ISO 14043 (2000) Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Life cycle interpretation. ISO 14043:2000(E) International Organisation of Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland
McLaren J, Wright L, Parkinson S, Jackson T (1999): A Dynamic Life-Cycle Energy Model of Mobile Phone Take-back and Recycling. J Industrial Ecology 3 (1) 77–91
Miyamoto K, Shimada M, Fukushima Y, Hirao M (2000): Lifecycle Analysis of Time-Dependent Scenario for Competing Products Made of Different Materials. Proc 4th Int Conf on EcoBalance, 161–164, Tsukuba
OMG (1999): Unified Modeling Language Specification version 1.3
Pesonen HL, Ekvall T, Fleischer G, Huppes G, Jahn C, Klos SZ, Rebitzer G, Sonnemann WG. Tintinelli A, Weidema BP, Wenzel H (2000): Framework for Scenario Development in LCA. Int J LCA 5 21–30
Shimada M, Miyamoto K, Fukushima Y, Hirao M (2000): Lifecycle Modeling for Dynamic LCA, Proc 4th Int Conf on EcoBalance, 165–168, Tsukuba
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fukushima, Y., Hirao, M. A structured framework and language for scenario-based Life Cycle assessment. Int J LCA 7, 317–329 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978679
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978679