Abstract
Differences in metabolism between different mercury species are well recognized. Conclusions that only a minor demethylation of methylmercury takes place in the brain are based primarily on results from short term studies. Results from a number of studies on humans exposed for many years to methylmercury have shown high concentrations of inorganic mercury in the brain in relation to total mercury. Similar evidence is available from studies on monkeys exposed for several years to methylmercury. The results indicate that a significant accumulation of inorganic mercury takes place with time despite the fact that the demethylation rate is slow. Differences in biological halftimes between different mercury species will explain the results. Some data do still need confirmation using different analytical methods. There is reason to believe that the one-compartment model for methyl mercury cannot be used without reservations. Inorganic mercury has a complicated metabolism. After exposure to metallic mercury vapor, inorganic mercury, probably bound to selenium, accumulates in the brain. A fraction of the mercury is excreted, with a long biological halftime. Studies on rats and monkeys indicate that inorganic mercury penetrates the blood-brain barrier only to a very limited-extent.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
WHO, Environmental Health Criteria I-Mercury, Geneva World Health Organization, p. 131 (1976).
T. W. Clarkson, J. B. Hursh, P. R. Sager, and T. L. M. Syversen,Biological Monitoring of Metals, T. W. Clarkson, L. Friberg, G. F. Nordberg, and P. Sager, eds., Plenum, New York, pp. 199–246 (1988).
M. Berlin, J. Carlson, and T. Norseth,Arch. Environ. Health 30, 307 (1975).
M. Berlin,Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals, vol. 2, L. Friberg, G. F. Nordberg, and V. B. Vouk, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986, pp. 387–445.
Report from an Expert Group, Nordisk Hygienisk Tidskrift, Supplementum 4, Stockholm 1971, pp. 1–364.
Y. Takizawa,Recent Advances in Minamata Disease Studies, T. Tsubaki, and H. Takahashi, eds. Kodansha Ltd., Tokyo, 1986, pp. 24–39.
K. Minagawa, F. Hirasawa, S. Hozumi, K. Chuang, and Y. Takizawa,Akita J. Med. 5, 56 (1979).
J. B. Hursh, T. W. Clarkson, M. G. Cherian, J. V. Vostal, and R. V. Mallie,Arch. Environ. Health 31, 302 (1976).
D. Newton and F. A. Fry,Ann. Occup. Hyg. 21, 21 (1978).
N. Takahata, H. Hayashi, S. Watanabe, and T. Anso,Folia Psychiatr. Neurol. Jpn. 24, 59 (1970).
T. Watanabe, T. Shimada, and A. Endo,Teratology 25, 381 (1982).
L. Kosta, A. R. Byrne, and V. Zelenko,Nature 254, 238 (1975).
S. Kitamura, K. Sumino, K. Hayakawa, and T. Shibata,Effects and Dose-Response Relationships of Toxic Metals, G. F. Nordberg, ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1976, pp. 290–298.
M. Nylander, L. Friberg, and B. Lind.Swed. Dent. J. 11, 179 (1987).
N. K. Mottet and T. M. Burbacher,J. Trace Elem. Exp. Med. 1, 41 (1988).
B. Lind, L. Friberg, and M. Nylander,J. Trace Elem. Exp. Med. 1, 49 (1988).
C.-G. Elinder, L. Gerhardsson, and G. Oberdoerster,Biological Monitoring of Metals, Plenum, New York, 1988, pp. 1–72.
L. Friberg,Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. 12, 411 (1956).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friberg, L., Mottet, N.K. Accumulation of methylmercury and inorganic mercury in the brain. Biol Trace Elem Res 21, 201–206 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02917253
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02917253