Scientific research is not itself a science; it is still an art or craft. W. H. George (1938)
Abstract
Interdisciplinary research has many faces—a philosophy, an art form, an artifact, and an antidote. It is all of these things because interdisciplinary research attempts to ask questions in ways that cut across disciplinary boundaries. This is not politically correct and universities especially find it difficult to manage interdisciplinarians and their projects. The author argues that interdisciplinary research has persisted as an alternative when traditional research approaches have failed to come up with answers to common problems. Interdisciplinary research will continue to survive as long as there are creative, risk-taking scientists who are dissatisfied with the political and organizational boundaries we establish around disciplines which limit our ability to learn about their commonalities.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Asimov, I. (1983).The roving mind. New York: Prometheus Books.
Birnbaum, P. H. (1981). Academic interdisciplinary research: characteristics of successful projects.Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 13 (1):5–16.
Birnbaum, P. H. (1978). Academic contexts of interdisciplinary research.Educational Administration Quarterly, 14 (2):80–97.
Birnbaum, P. H. (1982). The organization and management of interdisciplinary research, a progress report.Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 13 (4):11–24.
Blade, E. (1963). Creative Science. In: M. A. Coler (ed.),Essays on creativity in the sciences. New York: New York University Press.
Bruhn, J. G. (1995). Beyond discipline: creating a culture for interdisciplinary research.Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 30 (4):331–341.
Butler, D. (1998). Interdisciplinary research “being stifled”.Nature, 396 (Nov 19):202.
Campbell, D. T. (1969). Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish-scale model of omniscience. In M. Sherif and C. W. Sherif (eds.),Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences (pp. 328–348). Chicago: Aldine.
Cravens, D. W., Heathington, K. W., and Mundy, R. A. (1976). Organizing for interdisciplinary research in a university setting.Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 8 (1):3–10.
Crow, G. M. (1992). Are three heads better than one? Reflections on doing collaborative interdisciplinary research.American Educational Research Journal, 29 (4):580–600.
Dogan, M. and Pahre, R. (1990).Creative marginality: innovation at the intersections of social sciences. Boulder: Westview Press.
Gleick, J. (1987).Chaos: making a new science. New York: Viking.
George, W. H. (1938).The Scientist in action, a scientific study of his methods. New York: Emerson Books.
Hartmann, E. (1991).Boundaries in the mind. New York: Basic Books.
Heathington, K. W., Cunningham, J., and Mundy, R. A. (1978). Management of interdisciplinary research in universities: the state of the art.Educational Researcher, 7 (1):11–14.
Heberlein, T. A. (1988). Improving interdisciplinary research: integrating the social and natural sciences.Society and Natural Resources, 1, 5–16.
Journet, D. (1993). Interdisciplinary discourse and “boundary rhetoric”.Written Communication, 10 (4):510–541.
Karki, R. (1996). Searching for bridges between disciplines: an author co-citation analysis on the research into scholarly communication.Journal of Information Science, 22 (5):323–334.
Kash, D. E. (1988). Crossing the boundaries of disciplines.Engineering Education, 78 (10):93–98.
Kowalewski, D. and Laird, R. D. (1990). Interdisciplinarity gaps: a survey report.Educational Research Quarterly, 14 (2):32–40.
Klein, J. T. (1990). The interdisciplinary process. In: P. H. Birnbaum-More, F. A. Rossini and D. R. Baldwin (eds.),International research management (pp. 20–30). New York: Oxford University Press.
Klein, J. T. (1996).Crossing boundaries, knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Laughlin, P. and Sigerstad, M. H. (1990). The research administrator's role in creating a supportive environment for interdisciplinary research,Research Management Review: The Journal of the National Council of University Research Administrators, 4 (1):1–8.
Metzger, N. and Zare, R. N. (1999). Interdisciplinary research: from belief to reality.Science 283 (Jan 29):642–643.
Pignataro, L. J. and Mc Shane, W. R. (1979). Interdisciplinary research: transcending departmental conflicts.Engineering Education, 69 (4):349–351.
Qin, J., Lancaster, F. W. and Allen, B. (1997). Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (10):893–916.
Ricketts, T. C. and Kaluzny, A. D. (1987). Health promotion and industry: where interdisciplinary research meets reality.Evaluation and the Health Professions, 10 (3):304–322.
Robertson, I. T. (1981). Some factors associated with successful interdisciplinary research.Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 13 (1):5–16.
Rossini, F. A. and Porter, A. L. (1981). Interdisciplinary research: performance and policy issues.Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 13 (2):8–24.
Russell, M. G. and Sauer, R. J. (1983). Creating administrative environments for interdisciplinary research.Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 14 (4):21–31.
Salter, L. and Hearn, A. (1996).Outside the lines: Issues in interdisciplinary research. Montreal: Mc Gill-Queens University Press.
Saxberg, B. O. Newell, W. T., and Mar, B. W. (1981). Interdisciplinary research—a dilemma for university central administration.Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 13 (2):25–43.
Schank, R. with Childers, P. (1988).The creative attitude: Learning to ask and answer the right questions. New York: Macmillan.
Schrage, M. (1989).No more teams: Mastering the dynamics of creative collaboration. New York: Currency Doubleday.
Sternberg, R. J. and Lubart, T. I. (1995).Defying the crowd. New York: The Free Press.
Watt, R. (1991). The blocks on interdisciplinary research.New Scientist, 130 (1763):8.
Wilber, K. (1979).No boundary. Boston: New Science Library.
Winkler, K. J. (1987). Interdisciplinary research: How big a challenge to traditional fields?The Chronicle of Higher Education, 34 (6) (Oct 7):A1, A14, A15.
Wolf, S. (1998). The challenge and satisfaction of integrative thinking.Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 33 (2):120–121.
Zerubavel, E. (1991).The fine line: Making distinctions in everyday life. New York: The Free Press.
Ziman, J. (1981).Puzzles, problems and enigmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bruhn, J.G. Interdisciplinary research: A philosophy, art form, artifact or antidote?. Integr. psych. behav. 35, 58–66 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02911166
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02911166