Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Literature Cited
Andrews, E. A. A note on the relation between the tea mosquito (Helopeltis theivora) and the soil. Quart. Jour. Sci. Dep. Ind. Tea Assoc., Calcutta4: 31–35. 1914.
—. A preliminary note on the present state of the mosquito-blight enquiry. Quart. Jour. Sci. Dep. Ind. Tea Assoc., Calcutta4: 119–129. 1919.
-. Some notes on attempts to produce immunity from insect attack on tea. Rept. Proc. 4th Ent. Meet., Pusa, Feb. 1921, Calcutta, pp. 56–59.
-. Factors affecting the control of the tea mosquito bug (Helopeltis theivora Waterh.). Indian Tea Assoc. 1923. vi + 260 pp., London.
Annand, P. N. Tumors in kale. Science, N.S.,65: 553–554. 1927.
Anstead, R. D., And Ballard, E. Mosquito blight of tea. Planters’ Chron., Coimbatore17: 443–447; 453–455. 1922.
Baker, A. C. Feeding punctures of insects. Jour. Econ. Ent.15: 312. 1922.
Balch, R. E. Dreyfusia piceae (Ratz.) and its relation to “gout disease” in Balsam fir. 62nd Ann. Rep. Ent. Soc. Ontario 1931, pp. 61–65. 1932.
Ball, E. D. Leaf burn of the potato and its relation to the potato leafhopper. Science48: 194. 1918.
—. The potato leafhopper and its relation to the hopperburn. Jour. Econ. Ent.12: 149–155. 1919.
—,And Fenton, F. A. What per cent. of tipburn is caused by the potato leafhopper? Jour. Econ. Ent.13: 218–221. 1920.
—,Mann, C. E. T., And Staniland, L. N. Strawberry investigations at Long Ashton. Jour. Ministry Agr.34: 497–510; 627–641. 1927.
Bernard, C. De snoeimethode van Tjiboengoer. De bestrijding vanHelopeltis op Tjiboengoer. Meded. Proefst. Thee81: 32–35. 1922.
Beyer, A. H. Experiments on the biology and tipburn disease of the bean leafhopper with methods of control (Empoasca mali Le Baron). Jour. Econ. Ent.15: 298–302. 1922.
Binkley, A. M. Transmission studies with the new psyllid-yellows disease of solanaceous plants. Science70: 615. 1929.
Blood, H. L., Richards, B. L., And Wann, F. B. Studies of psyllid yellows of tomato. Abs. in Phytopath.23: 930. 1933.
Boode, F. J. C. Van Hooff’s Om-De-Andere-Rij-Snoeisysteem tegenHelopeltis. Meded. Proefst. Thee81: 47–49. 1922.
Borden, A. D. The pear leaf blister mite as a cause of fruit-bud injury. Circ. Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. No. 324, 8 pp. 1932.
Borg, P. Entomological notes. 9 pp. typescript. Malta Dept. Agric., received March 1930.
Börner, C. Neue Aufgaben der Reblausforschung. Zeits. Schädlingsbekämpfung1: 32–38. 1923.
—. Gibt es eine oder zwei Reblausarten amerikanischer Herkunft? Weinbau & Kellerwirtsch. i. pp. 245–249. 1922. Abs. Zeits. Pflanzenkr. & Gallenk. 33: 136–137. 1923.
—,And Schilder, F. A. Ueber das bisherige Auftreten der Blattgallenreblaus in Deutschland. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst. Land- u. Forstw.20: 325–346. 1933.
——. Beiträge zur Züchtung reblaus- und mehitaufester Reben. II. Das Verhalten der Blattreblaus zu den Reben des Naumburger Sortiments. Mitt. Biol. Reichsanst.49: 1–84. 1934.
Briton-Jones, H. R. Note on Mr. Edward B. Smith’s suggestions for froghopper control. Min. & Proc. of the Froghopper Inv. Comm., Trinidad & Tobago6: 147–148. 1927.
—,And Staniland, L. N. The effects of strawberry aphis (Capitophorus fragariae Theo.) on the strawberry plant. Jour. Pom. Hort. Sci.6: 128–136. 1927.
Burkill, Harold J. Some notes on midge galls. Entomologist (London)63: 59–61. 1930.
Carpenter, Isetta Pearl. Study of the life history and spotting habits ofEutettix chenopodii (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Univ. Kansas Sci. Bul.18: 457–483. 1928.
Carpenter, P. H., And Andrews, E. A. Report on tea mosquito blight. Planters’ Chron., Bangalore.14: 634–639. 1919.
Carter, Walter. The use of insecticides on pineapple plants in Hawaii. Jour. Econ. Ent.24: 1233–1242. 1931.
—. Studies of populations ofPseudococcus brevipes (Ckll.) occurring on pineapple plants. Ecology13: 296–304. 1932.
—. Border plantings as guard rows in pineapple mealybug control. Jour. Econ. Ent.25: 1–8. 1932.
—. The pineapple mealybug,Pseudococcus brevipes, and wilt of pineapples. Phytopath.23: 207–242. 1933.
—. The spotting of pineapple leaves caused byPseudococcus brevipes, the pineapple mealybug. Phytopath.23: 243–259. 1933.
—. Mealybug wilt and green spot in Jamaica and Central America. Phytopath.24: 424–426. 1934.
—. The symbionts ofPseudococcus brevipes (Ckll.). Ann. Ent. Soc. America28: 60–64. 1935.
—. Diesel oil emulsions as insecticides. Jour. Econ. Ent.28: 268–284. 1935.
—. Studies on biological control ofPseudococcus brevipes (Ckll.) in Jamaica and Central America. Jour. Econ. Ent.28: 1037–1041. 1935.
—. The symbionts ofPseudococcus brevipes in relation to a phytotoxic secretion of the insect. Phytopath.26: 176–183. 1936.
—. Insects and plant diseases. Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc.9: 159–170. 1936.
—. The toxicogenic and toxiniferous insect. Science83: 522. 1936.
—. Importation and laboratory breeding of two chalcid parasites ofPseudococcus brevipes (Ckll.). Jour. Econ. Ent.30: 370–372. 1937.
—. The toxic dose of mealybug wilt of pineapple. Phytopath.27: 971–981. 1937.
-. The geographical distribution of mealybug wilt with notes on some other insect pests of pineapple. (In press.)
—,And Schmidt, Carl T. Mass action phenomena in mealybug wilt. Ann. Ent. Soc. America28: 396–403. 1935.
Childs, L. The relation of woolly apple aphis to perennial canker infection with other notes on the disease. Bull. Oregon Agr. Exp. Sta. 243, 31 pp. 1929.
Cohen-Stuart, C. P. Iets over den steek vanHelopeltis. Meded. Proefst. Thee81: 24–25. 1922.
Cook, M. T. The origin and structure of plant galls. Science, N.S.57: 6–14. 1923.
Cotterell, G. S. Pests of cacao in the Gold Coast. Proc. 1st. W. Afr. Agr. Conf. Ibadan, Nigeria, pp. 98–112. 1927.
Daniels, L. B. The tomato psyllid and the control of psyllid yellows of potatoes. Colo. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 410, 18 pp. 1934.
De Jong, J.K. De invloed van het klimaat op.Helopeltis. I. De invloed van de relatieve vochtigheid op deHelopeltis in theedistricten van Sumatra’s Oostkust. Arch. Theecult. Ned.-Ind. 1931.3: 135–142. 1931.
—.Helopeltis in cacaotuinen. Bergcultures8: 658–667. 1934.
—. De Voedselopname vanHelopeltis. Bergcultures9: 292–294. 1935.
—. Enkele resultaten betreffende de gehouden enquête overHelopeltis en Redrust. Bergcultures9: 318–327. 1935.
DeLong, D. M. The rôle of Bordeaux mixture as a leafhopper insecticide. Jour. Econ. Ent.22: 345–353. 1929.
—. Biological studies on the leafhopperEmpoasca fabae as a bean pest. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bul. 618, pp. 1–60. 1938.
—,Reid, W. J., And Darley, M. M. The toxicity of copper to the potato leafhopper. Jour. Econ. Ent.23: 390–394. 1930.
Dieuzeide, R. Contribution à l’étude des néoplasmes végétaux. Le rôle des pucerons en phytopathologie. Actes Soc. Linnéenne Bordeaux81: 1–241. 1928.
Docters van Leeuwen-Reijnvaan, J. (Mrs.), and Docters van Leeuwen, W. M. The Zoocecidia of the Netherlands East Indies. ’s Lands Plantentuin: Buitenzorg 1926. 601 p.
——. Über ein von Gynaikothrips devriesii Karny aus einer Gallmücken-Galle gebildetes Thysanoptero-Cecidium. Rec. Trav. Bot. Neèr.25a: 99–114. 1928.
Dudley, J. E. Control of the potato leafhopper (Empoasca mali Le B.) and prevention of “hopperburn.” Jour. Econ. Ent.13: 408–415. 1920.
Egloffstein, H. A. C. F. E., von und zu. Helopeltis-Bestrijding op de Onderneming Tjikopo-Zuid. Meded. Proefst. voor Thee, Buitenzorg59: 39–50. 1918.
Essig, E. O. The blackberry mite, the cause of redberry disease of the Himalaya blackberry, and its control. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 399, 10 pp. 1925.
Ewing, K. P. Effects on the cotton plant of the feeding of certain Hemiptera of the Family Miridae. Jour. Econ. Ent.22: 761–765. 1929.
—,And McGarr, R. L. The effect of certain Homopterous insects as compared with three common mirids upon the growth and fruiting of cotton plants. Jour. Econ. Ent.26: 943–953. 1933.
Eyer, J. R. The influence of leafhopper control on potato fields. Jour. Econ. Ent.14: 69–71. 1921.
—. Preliminary note on the etiology of potato tipburn. Science, N.S.55: 180–181. 1922.
—. Notes on the etiology and specificity of the potato tipburn produced byEmpoasca mali Le Baron. Phytopath.12: 181–184. 1922.
—. Physiology of psyllid yellows of potatoes. Jour. Eicon. Ent.30: 891–898. 1937.
—,And Crawford, R. F. Observations on the feeding habits of the potato psyllid (Paratrioza cockerelli Sulc.) and the pathological history of the “psyllid yellows” which it produces. Jour. Econ. Ent.26: 846–850. 1933.
Faes, H., Staehelin, M., And Bovey, P. La lutte contre les parasites de la vigne, champignons et insectes, en 1930 et 1931. Ann. Agr. Suisse33: 1–34. 1932.
Felt, E. P. The relations of insects and plants in gall production. Ann. Ent. Soc. America29: 694–700. 1936.
Fenton, F. A. Progress report on the season’s work on the production of potato tip-burn. Jour. Econ. Ent.14: 71–83. 1921.
—. Notes on the biology of the leafhopperEutettix strobi Fitch. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 1924.31: 437–440. 1925.
-,And Hartzell, A. Control of the potato leafhopper. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ.77, 4 pp. 1922.
——. Bionomics and control of the potato leafhopperEmpoasca mail Le Baron. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul. 78, pp. 379–440. 1923.
—,And Ressler, I. L. Artificial production of tip-burn. Jour. Econ. Ent.14: 510. 1921.
——. Artificial production of tip-burn. Science55: 54. 1922.
——. Artificial production of hopperburn. Jour. Econ. Ent.15: 288–295. 1922.
Feuilletau de Bruyn, W. Helopeltis-bestrijding. Meded. Proefst. Thee86: 1–14. 1924.
Fife, L. C. Damage to sea island cotton by the West Indian blister mite (Eriophyes gossypii Banks) in Puerto Rico. Jour. Agr. Univ. Puerto Rico21: 169–177. 1937.
Follett-Smith, R. R. The nutrient status of the observation plot soils. Min. & Proc. Frog. Invest. Comm., Trinidad & Tobago13: 145–151. 1928.
—. A comparison of the hydrophilic celloid content of sap of leaves of sugar canes growing in good and in bad soil. Min. & Proc. Frog. Invest. Comm., Trinidad & Tobago13: 158–161. 1928.
Froggatt, W. W. Leaf galls ofPhylloxera at Howlong. Agr. Gaz. New South Wales33: 360. 1922.
Fryer, J. C. F. Capsid bugs. Jour. Board Agr., London22: 950–958. 1916.
Fulmek, L. Die Kräuselkrankheit (Akarinose) des Weinstockes. Sonderabdruck aus Archiv für Chemie and Mikroskopie, 1913. Heft 6. Mitt. Pflanzenschutz Station in Wein. 32 pp.
—. Milbenkräusel und Wanzenkräusel im steierischen Schilcherweinbaugebiet. Das Weinland, 1930.7: 251. 1930.
Garretsen, A. J. Het snoeien om de andere rij ter bestrijding vanHelopeltis. Meded. Proefst. Thee81: 36–39. 1922.
—. Groenbemesters enHelopeltis. De Thee4: 57–58. 1923
Gescher, C. Zur Reblauskunde und Reblausbekämpfung. Die kranke Pflanze5: 60–62. 1928.
Graber, L. F., and Sprague, V. G. Alfalfa yellows. Science78 (2026): Oct. 1933.
Grandori, R. Esperimenti di lotta contro la Filossera della vite (Phylloxera vastatrix Plan.) mediante il Para-Italia (Paradichlorobenzolo). Boll. Lab. Zool. Agr. Bachic. Milano. i (1928–1929), pp. 95–110. 1930.
Granovsky, A. A. Studies on leafhopper injury to apple leaves. Phytopath.16: 413–422. 1926.
—. Alfalfa “yellow top” and leafhoppers. Jour. Econ. Ent.21: 261–266. 1928.
—. Differentiation of symptoms and effect of leafhopper feeding on histology of alfalfa leaves. Abs. in Phytopath.20: 121. 1930.
Greenslade, R. M. Horticultural aspects of woolly aphis control together with a survey of the literature. Imper. Bur. Fruit Prod. Tech. Com. No. 8, 88 pages. 1936.
—,Massee, A. M., And Roach, W. A. A progress report of the causes of immunity to the apple woolly aphis (Eriosoma lanigerum Hausm.) Ann. Rep. East Mailing Res. Sta. 1933.21: 220–224. 1934.
Grove, A. J., And Ghosh, C. C. The life history ofPsylla isitis Buckt. (Psyllopa punctipennis Crawford), the “Psylla” disease of indigo. Mem. Dept. Agr. India, Entom. Ser.4: 329–357. 1914.
Hanson, A. J. The redberry disease of blackberries. Proc. Wash. St. Hort. Ass’n26: 199–201. 1930.
-. The blackberry mite and its control (Eriophyes essigi Hassan). Bull. Wash. Agr. Exp. Sta. No. 279. 20 pp. 1933.
Hardy, F. The liming problem in Trinidad sugar cane soils. Min. & Proc. Frog. Invest. Comm., Trinidad & Tobago7: 202–210. 1927.
—. Investigations into the froghopper blight of sugar cane in Trinidad. Min. & Proc. Frog. Invest. Comm., Trinidad & Tobago8: 218–235. 1927.
—,And Urich, F. W. Progress Report. Biochemical work: Soil research. Min. & Proc. Frog. Invest. Comm., Trinidad & Tobago9: 276–281. 1927.
——. Progress report: Recovery of blight canes. Min. & Proc. Frog. Invest. Comm., Trinidad & Tobago14: 182–187. 1929.
Harland, S. C. The inheritance of immunity to leaf-blister mite (Eriophyes gossypii Banks) in cotton. West Indian Bull., Barbados17: 162–166. 1919.
Harris, W. V. The mosquito blight of tea. Planter1: 13 & 15. 1933.
—. Notes on two injurious psyllids and their control. East Afr. Agr. Jour.1: 498–500. 1936.
Hart, S. J. G. De lamtoro in verband met deHelopeltis. Algem. Land-bouwweekblad Ned.-Indie8: 477–478. 1923.
Hartzell, A. Further notes on the life history of the potato leafhopper (Empoasca mali Le Baron). Jour. Econ. Ent.14: 62–68. 1921.
Herford, G. V. B. Studies on the secretion of diastase and invertase byEmpoasca solana DeLong (Rhynchota, Homoptera, Jassidae). Ann. Appl. Biol.22: 301–306. 1935.
Heriot, A. D. Notes on the blister made byEriophyes pyri Nal. Proc. Ent. Soc. B. C.31: 41–42. 1935.
Hollowell, E. A., Monteith, Jr.,J., And Flint, W. P. Leafhopper injury to clover. Phytopath.17: 399–404. 1927.
Horne, A. S., And Maxwell-Lefroy, H. Effects produced by sucking insects and red spider upon potato foliage. Ann. Appl. Biol.1:370–386. 1915.
Houard, C. Les Zoocécidies des plantes de l’Amérique du Sud et de l’Amérique Centrale. 1–546 p., Hermann et Cie: Paris 1933.
Husmann, George C. Testing Phylloxera-resistant grape stocks in the vinifera regions of the United States. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bul. No. 146, pp. 1–54. 1930.
Illingworth, J. F. Preliminary report on evidences that mealybugs are an important factor in pineapple wilt. Tour. Econ. Ent.24: 877–889. 1931.
Ito, K. Studies on the life history of the pineapple mealybugPseudococcus brevipes (Ckll.) Jour. Econ. Ent.31: 291–298. 1938.
Jancke, O. Beiträge zur innertherapeutischen Schädlingsbekämpfung. I. Mitteilung. Zeits. ang. Ent.18: 276–318. 1931.
—. Über die Blutlausanfälligkeit von Apfelsorten, wilden Malussorten und -bastarden, sowie die Züchtung blutlausfester Edeläpfel und Unterlagen. Phytopath. Zeits.10: 184–196. 1937.
Jewett, H. H. Leafhopper injury to clover and alfalfa. Kentucky Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 293, pp. 157–172. 1929.
-. The resistance of certain red clovers and alfalfa to leafhopper injury. Kentucky Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 329, pp. 155–172. 1932.
—. The resistance of leaves of red clover to puncturing. Jour. Econ. Ent.26: 1135–1137. 1933.
-. The relation of time of cutting to leafhopper injury to alfalfa. Kentucky Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 348, pp. 51–59. 1934.
—. The resistance of leaves of some pubescent red clovers to puncturing. Jour. Econ. Ent.28: 697–698. 1935.
-. A leafhopper pest of clover and alfalfa. Kentucky Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ.44, 7 pp. 1936.
Johnson, C. G. The biology ofLeptobyrsa rhododendri Horvath (Hemiptera, Tingitidae), theRhododendron lacebug. II. Feeding habits and the histology of the feeding lesions produced in Rhododendron leaves. Ann. Appl. Biol.24: 342–355. 1937.
Johnson, H. W. Nature of injury to forage legumes by the potato leafhopper. Jour. Agr. Res.49: 379–406. 1934.
—. Further determinations of the carbohydrate-nitrogen relationship and carotene in leafhopper-yellow and green alfalfa. Phytopath.28: 273–277. 1938.
—,And Hollowell, E. A. Pubescent and glabrous characters of soybeans as related to resistance to injury by the potato leafhopper. Jour. Agr. Res.51: 371–381. 1935.
Jones, F. R., And Geanovsky, A. A. Yellowing of alfalfa caused by leafhoppers. Abs. in Phytopath.17: 39. 1927.
Kendall, J. The structure and development of certain Eriophyid galls. Zeits. Parasitenk. Zeits. Wiss. Biol. Abt. F.2: 477–501. 1930.
-. Histological and cytological studies of stems of plants injected with certain chemicals. (A contribution to the gall problem). Doctorate thesis, Sofia Univ. June 1930.
King, W. V., and Cook, W. S. Feeding punctures of mirids and other plant-sucking insects and their effect on cotton. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bul. 296, 11 pp. 1932.
Knight, H. H. An investigation of the scarring of fruit caused by apple redbugs. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 396, pp. 187–208. 1918.
Knowlton, G. F., And Thomas, W. L. Host plants of the potato psyllid. Jour. Econ. Ent.27: 547. 1934.
Kostoff, D., And Kendall, J. Studies on the structure and development of certain cynipid galls. Biol. Bul. of the Marine Biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Mass.56: 402–458. 1929.
-,And -. Studies on plant tumors and polyploidy produced by bacteria annd other agents. Archiv. für Mikrobiologie. Zeitschrift für die Erforschung der pflanzlichen Mikroorganismen. Sonderabdruck aus 4. Band. 4. Heft. 1933.
Kotila, J. E. Hopperburn of potato and its control. Quart. Bull. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta.3: 128–131. 1921.
Küster, E. Pathologische Pflanzenanatomie. 1903.
—. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der panaschierten Gehölze. xviii–xxii. Mit. Deut. Dend. Ges.1928: 258–267. 1928.
Larsen, L. D. Diseases of the pineapple. Haw’n. Sugar Planters’ Assoc. Pathol. and Physiol. Ser. Bull. 10. 1910.
Leach, J. G. Leafhopper injury of potatoes. Abs. in Phytopath.12: 37. 1922.
—,And Decker, P. A potato wilt caused by the tarnished plant bugLygus pratensis L. Phytopath,28: 13. 1938.
Leach, R. Insect injury simulating fungal attack on plants. A stem canker, an angular spot, a fruit scab and a fruit rot of mangoes caused byHelopeltis bergrothi Reut. (Capsidae). Ann. Appl. Biol.22: 525–537. 1935.
—,And Smee, C. Gnarled stem canker of tea caused by the capsid bug (Helopeltis bergrothi Reut.). Ann. Appl. Biol.20: 691–706. 1933.
Lean, O. B. Observations on the life history ofHelopeltis on cotton in Southern Nigeria. Bull. Ent. Res.16: 319–324. 1926.
Leefmans, S. OverHelopeltis in theetuinen. Dept. van Landbouw, Nijverheid en Handel, Buitenzorg, Med. Proefstation voor Thee, No. 46, 21 pp. 1916.
-. Bijdrage tot het Helopeltis-vraagstuk voor de Thee. Meded. v. h. Proefstation voor Thee, Buitenzorg, No. 50. 214 pp. 1916.
Lees, A. H. “Reversion” and resistance to “Big Bud” in black currants. Ann. Appl. Biol.5: 11–27. 1918.
Levine, Michael. A preliminary report on plants treated with the carcinogenic agents of animals. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club61: 103–118. 1934.
Light, S. S. Helopeltis in Ceylon. Tea Quart., Jour. Tea Res. Inst. Ceylon3: 21–26. 1930.
List, G. M. Lime-sulfur for tomato psyllid control. Colo. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 411, 14 pp. 1934.
—. Psyllid yellows of tomatoes and control of the psyllid,Paratrioza cockerelli Sulc., by the use of sulphur. Jour. Econ. Ent.28: 431–436. 1935.
—,And Daniels, L. B. A promising control for psyllid yellows of potatoes. Science79: 79. 1934.
Lutman, B. F. An outbreak of hopperburn in Vermont. Phytopath.13: 237–241. 1923.
Lutz, Frank E., and Brown, F. Martin. A new species of bacteria and the gall of an aphid. Amer. Mus. Novitates 305, 4 p. 1928.
McDaniel, E. I. Control of the potato leafhopperEmpoasca fabae on dahlia with flour, talc and infusorial earth. Jour. Econ. Ent.29: 464. 1936.
McGarr, R. L. Damage to the cotton plant caused byMegalopsallus atriplicis Kngt. and other species of Miridae. Jour. Econ. Ent.26: 953–956. 1933.
Magnus, W. Die Entstehung der Pflanzengallen verursacht durch Hymenopteren. 1914. G. Fischer.
Makarov-Kozhukhov, L. N. The introduction of substances into plants and its prospects in the control ofPhylloxera. Vestn. Vinogr. Vinodel. Vinotorg. S.S.S.R.3: 519–526. 1931.
—. Contribution to the elucidation of some questions onPhylloxera in the Kuban Region. Vestn. Vinogr. Vinodel. Vinotorg. S.S.S.R.3: 776–782. 1931.
Malpighi, Marcalli. Opera omni: de Gallis Londini2: 17. 1686.
Marchal, P. La question des races duPhylloxera de la vigne. Ann. Epiphyties16: 232–234 (1930). 1931.
Martin, J. P. Stem galls of sugar cane induced with an insect extract. The Haw. Planters’ Record42: 129–134. Second Quarter. 1938.
Massee, A. M. The gall mites of the Himalaya berry and raspberry. Ann. Rept. East Malling Res. Sta., 192513: 154–156. 1927.
—. The black currant gall mite on red currants. Ann. Rept. East Malling Res. Sta., 1926 & 192714 &15: 151–152. 1928.
Maxwell-Lefroy, H. The psylla disease of indigo in Behar. Agr. Jour. India8: 1–25. 1913.
Menusan, Jr.,H. Leafhopper injury to potato foliage and its relation to tuber yields. Jour. Econ. Ent.30: 772–777. 1937.
Metcalf, Z. P. Peanut “pouts.” Science86: 374. 1937.
Monteith, Jr.,J. Leafhopper injury of legumes. Abs. in Phytopath.18: 137–138. 1928.
Monzen, K. The woolly apple aphis (Erisoma lanigera Hausm.) in Japan, with special reference to its life-history and the susceptibility of the host plant. Vehr. III. Internat. Ent.-Kongr. Zürich, 1925.2: 249–275. 1926.
Moreau, A. P. Un nouvel ennemi du cottonier en Afrique équatoriale françaiseHelopeltis bergrothi Reut. Agron. Colon. no. 191. pp. 129–140. 1933.
Mote, D. C., And Wilcox, J. Redberry mite of the blackberry. Proc. Wash. St. Hort. Ass’n27: 203–207. 1931.
Müller, A. Zur inneren Therapie der Pflanzen. Verh. Deut. Ges. Angew. Ent.4. Mitgliederversamml. Frankfurt a.M. 10. bis 13. pp. 26–33. 1924.
-. Die innere Therapie der Pflanzen. Monogr. Ang. Ent. no. 8 (Supplement to Zeits. Ang. Ent., xii), vi + 206 pp. 1926.
—. Versuche zur inneren Therapie der Pflanzen. Anz. Schädlingsk., iii, nos. 3–4: pp. 29–33; 41–46. 1927.
Müller, K. Reblausimmunität und Brauchbarkeit der Unterlagsreben für deutsche Verhältisse. Mitt. deuts. Landw.-Ges., 1928. St. 15, reprint 2 pp. Berlin. 1928. (Abs. Centralbl. Bakt., (2) 75: 317–318. 1928.)
Nierenstein, M. Galls. Nature (London)125: 348–349. 1930.
Noble, N. S. The citrus gall wasp (Eurytoma fellis Girault). Sci. Bull. Dep. Agr. New South Wales53: 1–41. 1936.
Nougaret, R. L., and Lapham, M. H. A study ofPhylloxera infestation in California as related to types of soils. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bul. 20, 38 pp. 1928.
Nowell, W. Investigation of froghopper pest and diseases of sugar cane. Trin. & Tob. Coun. Paper No. 39 of 1919. 10 pp. 1919.
—,And Williams, C. B. Sugar cane blight in Trinidad: A summary of conclusions. Bull. Dept. Agr. Trinidad & Tobago19: 8–10. 1920.
Painter, R. H. A study of the cotton flea-hopperPsallus seriatus Reut., with especial reference to its effect on cotton plant tissues. Jour. Agr. Res.40: 485–516. 1930.
Parks, T. H., And Clayton, E. E. Controlling tipburn or hopperburn of potatoes. Cooperative demonstrations establish value of Bordeaux sprays. Monthly. Bull. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta.6: 168–171. 1921.
——. Potato hopperburn (tipburn) control with Bordeaux mixture. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 368, pp. 243–258. 1923.
Parr, Thaddeus J. Matsucoccus sp., a scale insect injurious to certain pines in the northeast (Hemiptera-Homoptera). (In press.)
Parrott, P. J., And Olmstead, R. D. The work ofEmpoasca mali on potato foliage. Jour. Econ. Ent.13: 224–226. 1920.
Petherbridge, F. R., And Husain, M. A. A study of the capsid bugs found on apple trees. Ann. Appl. Biol.4: 179–205. 1918.
Phillips, J. S. The biology and distribution of ants in Hawaiian pineapple fields. Exp. Sta., Pine. Prod. Coop. Ass’n. Bull. 15. 1934. Pp. 1–57.
Pickles, A. On the oviposition ofTomaspis saccharina Dist. (Rhynch., Cercop.) an insect pest of the sugar cane in Trinidad. Bull. Ent. Res.22: 461–468. 1931.
—. Entomological contributions to the study of the sugar cane froghopper. Trop. Agr.10: 222–233. 1933.
—. Entomological contributions to the study of the sugar cane froghopper. Trop. Agr.10: 240–245; 286–295. 1933.
Poos, F. W. Leafhopper injury to legumes. Jour. Econ. Ent.22: 146–153. 1929.
—,And Haenseler, C. M. Injury to varieties of eggplant by the potato leafhopperEmpoasca fabae (Harris). Jour. Econ. Ent.24: 890–892. 1931.
—,And Johnson, H. W. Injury to alfalfa and red clover by the potato leafhopper. Jour. Econ. Ent.29: 325–331. 1936.
—,And Smith, F. F. A comparison of oviposition and nymphal development ofEmpoasca fabae (Harris) on different host plants. Jour. Econ. Ent.24: 361–371. 1931.
—,And Westover, H. L. “Alfalfa yellows”. Science79: 319. 1934.
—,And Wheeler, N. H. On the hereditary ability of certain insects to transmit diseases and to cause disease-like injuries to plants. Jour. Econ. Ent.27: 58–69. 1934.
Printz, Ya. I. Zur Frage der Virulenzveränderung der Reblaus-Biotypen. Plant. Prot. fasc. 12. pp. 137–142. 1937.
Rahn, Otto. Invisible radiations of organisms. Protoplasma-Monographien.9: 171. 1936.
Rawitscher, F. Wohin stechen die Pflanzenläuse? Zeit. Bot26: 145. 1933. (Abstr. in Zeits. Pflanzenk.43: 699. 1933.)
Rice, P. L. Cat-facing of peaches by the tarnished plant bugLygus pratensis L. Trans. Peninsula Hort. Soc. 1937, pp. 131–136. 1938.
Richards, B. L. A new and destructive disease of the potato in Utah and its relation to the potato psylla. Abs. in Phytopath.18: 140–141. 1928.
—. Further studies with psyllid yellows of the potato. Abs. in Phytopath.21: 103. 1931.
—,And Blood, H. L. Psyllid yellows of the potato. Jour. Agr. Res.46: 189–216. 1933.
Ripley, L. B. “Froghopper” in wattles. Farm. in S. Africa.1: 423. 1927.
-. “Froghopper” in wattles. Farm. in S. Africa. Reprint 51, 4 pp. 1929.
Roach, W. A., And Massee, A. M. Preliminary experiments on the physiology of the resistance of certain rootstocks to attack by woolly aphis. 16th–18th Ann. Rep. East Mailing Res. Sta., 1928-19302: 111–120. 1931. 207. Roberts, J. I. The tobacco capsid (Engytatus volucer Kirk.) in Rhodesia. Bull. Ent. Res. 21: 169–183. 1930.
Roepke, W. Helopeltis-vraagstuk, in het bijzonder met betrekking tot Cacao. Med. Proefsta. Midden-Java, Batavia21: 40 + iii pp. 1916.
Ruggles, A. G., and Eyer, J. R. Preliminary notes on the life-history and control of the potato leafhopperEmpoasca mali LeB. 19th Rep. Minn. St. Ent. 1921–1922, pp. 10–14. 1923.
Sanford, G. B. A malady of the potato in Alberta similar to psyllid yellows. Sci. Agr.15: 46–48. 1934.
Searls, E. M. A preliminary report on the resistance of certain legumes to certain homopterous insects. Jour. Econ. Ent.25: 46–49. 1932.
—. The effect of alfalfa cutting schedules upon the occurrence of the potato leafhopper (Empoasca fabae Harris) and alfalfa yellows in Wisconsin. Jour. Econ. Ent.27: 80–88. 1934.
—. Further studies on the effect of controlling the potato leaf-hopper (Empoasca fabae Harris) in alfalfa by designed cutting. Jour. Econ. Ent.28: 831–833. 1935.
Shapovalov, M. Tuber transmission of psyllid yellows in California. Abs. in Phytopath.19: 1140. 1929.
Slocock, O. C. A. The lacewing fly. Yearb. Rhododendr. Ass’n. 89–92. 1934.
Smee, C. Tea mosquito bug in Nyasaland (Helopeltis bergrothi Reut.) and notes on two potential pests of tea, (1) the tea leaf weevil (Dicasticus mlanjensis Mshl.), (2) the bean flower capsid (Callicratides rama Kirby). Bull. Dept. Agr. Nyasaland, Ent. Ser.4: 1–10. 1928.
—,And Leach, R. Mosquito bug the cause of stem canker of tea. Bull. Dep. Agr. Nyasaland, N.S.5: 1–7. 1932.
Smith, E. B. Suggestions for the control of froghoppers on sugar cane estates. Trin. & Tob.: Min. & Proc. Frog. Invest. Comm.5: 118–123. 1926.
Smith, F. F. Injury to hollyhock and marigold by the potato leaf-hopperEmpoasca fabae (Harris.) Jour. Econ. Ent.25: 318–321. 1932.
—. The nature of the sheath material in the feeding punctures produced by the potato leafhopper and the three-cornered alfalfa hopper. Jour. Agr. Res.47: 475–485. 1933.
—,And Poos, F. W. The feeding habits of some leafhoppers of the genusEmpoasca. Jour. Agr. Res.43: 267–285. 1931.
Smith, K. M. Investigation of the nature and cause of the damage to plant tissue resulting from the feeding of capsid bugs. Ann. Appl. Biol.7: 40–55. 1920.
—. A comparative study of the feeding methods of certain Hemiptera and of the resulting effects upon the plant tissue, with special reference to the potato plant. Ann. Appl. Biol.13: 109–139. 1926.
-. Recent advances in the study of plant viruses. 1934.
Smolak, J. Fytoptosa šeřiku. Sborn. čsl. Akad. Zeměd.8A: 39–50. 1933.
Staniland, L. N. The immunity of apple stocks from attacks of woolly aphis (Eriosoma lanigerum Hausmann). Part II. The causes of the relative resistance of the stocks. Bull. Ent. Res.15: 157–170. 1924.
Stellwaag, F. Die Grundlagen für den Anbau reblauswiderstands-fähiger Unterlagsreben zur Immunisierung verseuchter Gebiete. Monogr. Ang. Ent.7: 1–88. Beiheft Zeits. Ang. Ent. 10, 1924.
—. Die Milben-oder Kräuselkrankheit der Rebe und ihre Bekämpfung. Flugbl. Biol. Reichsanst. Land- u. Forstw.102: 1–4. 1931.
—. Die Milbenkräuselkrankheit des Rebstockes in ihrer Differentialdiagnose gegenüber ähnlichen Schäden im Weinbaugebiet der Rheinpfalz. Anz. Schädlingsk.7: 73–77. 1931.
Steven, R. M., And Potter, J. A. Cane varieties and froghopper blight. Min. & Proc. Frog. Invest. Comm., Trinidad & Tobago13: 162–164. 1928.
Steyaert, R. L., and Vrydagh, J. Étude sur une maladie grave du cotonnier provoquée par les piqûres d’Helopeltis. Mem. Inst. Colon. Belge (Sci. Nat.) 1 fasc.7, 55 pp. 1933.
Tate, H. D. Method of penetration, formation of stylet sheaths and source of food supply of aphids. Iowa State College Jour. Sci.11: 185–206. 1937.
Topi, M. Ancora sulla esistenza di diverse specie di filossera della vite e sulla attaccabilita delle viti americane da parte della filossera. Atti R. Acad. Naz. Lincei, Rendiconti, Classe Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat.33: 1 sem. no. 12: 528–530. 1924.
—. Sulle probabili cause del diverso comportamento della fillossera, specialmente gallecola, in rapporto ai vari vitigni americani. Monitore Zool. Ital.37: 74–84. 1926.
—. Sulla esistenza di diverse razze della fillossera della vite e sui loro presunti caratteri distintivi. Monitore Zool. Ital.38: 167–180. 1927.
Turner, P. E. The lime status of soil in relation to an insect pest of sugar cane. Jour. Agr. Sci.19(1). 1929.
Underhill, G. W., And Cox, James A. Studies on the resistance of apple to the woolly apple aphidEriosoma lanigerum (Hausm.). Jour. Econ. Ent.31: 622–625. 1938.
Urich, F. W. History of sugar cane blight in Trinidad from 1920–1924. Min. & Proc. Frog. Invest. Comm., Trinidad & Tobago6: 149–152. 1927.
—,And Hardy, F. Progress Report: Soil reaction and blight. Min. & Proc. Frog. Invest. Comm., Trinidad & Tobago8: 213–217. 1927.
van der Goot, P. De Zwarte Cacao-Mier (Dolichoderus bituberculatus Mayr) en haar Beteekenis voor de Cacao-Cultuur op Java. Meded. v. h. Proefstation Midden-Java, Salatiga.25: 1–142. 1917.
van Hooff, H. W. S. Snoeien enHelopeltis. Meded. Proefst. Thee.81: 26–31. 1922.
—. De op Tjiboengoer genomen Maatregelen tegenHelopeltis. Meded. Proefst. Thee.81: 40–44. 1922.
Vasil’ev, I. V. On the race of the UkrainianPhylloxera. Vestn. Vinodel. Ukrainui.30: 13–14. 1929.
Veitch, R. The grapePhylloxera. Queensland Agr. Jour.39: 79–83. 1933.
Venables, E. P., and Heriot, A. D. The blister mite of apple and pear. Publ. Dep. Agr. Canada No. 577, 3 pp. 1937.
Vodinskaya, K. I. Die Gallenreblaus in Tuapse. Bull. Plant. Prot. (1 Ent.)4: 97–118. 1932.
Wadley, F. M. Observations on the injury caused byToxoptera graminum Rond. (Homoptera: Aphididae). Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash.31: 130–134. 1929.
Watson(Hamilton), M. A. Factors affecting the amount of infection obtained by aphis transmission of the virus Hy. III. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London. Ser. B—Biol. Sci.226: 457–489. 1936.
Wells, Betram W. The comparative morphology of the Zoocecidia ofCeltis occidentalis. Ohio Jour. Sci.16(7). 1916.
Whitehead, F. E. Preliminary report on the pecanPhylloxerae. Rep. Okl. Agr. Exp. Sta., 1930–1932, pp. 265–267. 1933.
Wiesner, Julius von. Die Rohstoffe des Pflanzenreichs. 4th ed., Vol. 1, edited by Paul Krais, Wilhelm v. Brehmer. iv + 1122 pp. 1927.
Williams, C. B. Froghopper blight of sugar cane in Trinidad. Mem. Dep. Agr. Trin. & Tob.1: 1–170. 1921.
Wilson, H. F. Injurious gall mites. 2nd Biennial Crop Pest and Hort. Rep. 1913 and 1914. Oregon Agr. Exp. Sta., pp. 123–126.
Withycombe, C. L. Studies on the aetiology of sugar cane froghopper blight in Trinidad. I. Introduction and general survey. Ann. Appl. Biol.13: 64–108. 1926.
Zweigelt, F. Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Saugphänomens der Blattläuse und der Reaktionen der Pflanzenzellen. Zeits. Pflanzenk.27(4): 207. 1917. (Abs. Centralbl. Bakteriol., II, xlii, 1915, pp. 265–335).
—. Blattlausgallen, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Anatomie und Aetiologie. Centralbl. Bakt. Parasit., u. Infektionskr., Jena. Ite, Abt.47(16–22): 408–535. 1917.
-. Blattlausgallen. Histogenetische und biologische Studien anTetraeura und Schizoneura-gallen. Die Blattlausgallen im Dienste prinzipieller Gallenforschung. Monog. Angew. Ent. no. 11, Zeits. Ang. Ent. xvii, Beiheft, xxi + 684 pp. 1931.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Published with the approval of the Director as Miscellaneous Paper No. 28 of the Pineapple Experiment Station, University of Hawaii.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carter, W. Injuries to plants caused by insect toxins. Bot. Rev 5, 273 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02878504
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02878504