Abstract
Sources of the extensive morphological variation of the species and hybrids ofPotamogeton were studied, especially from the viewpoint of the stability of the morphological characters used inPotamogeton taxonomy. Transplant experiments, the cultivation of clones under different values of environmental factors, and the cultivation of different clones under uniform conditions were performed to assess the proportion of phenotypic plasticity in the total morphological variation. Samples from 184 populations of 41Potamogeton taxa were grown. The immense range of phenotypic plasticity, which is possible for a single clone, is documented in detail in 14 well-described examples. The differences among distinct populations of a single species observed in the field were mostly not maintained when grown together under the same environmental conditions. Clonal material cultivated under different values of environmental factors produced distinct phenotypes, and in a few cases a single genotype was able to demonstrate almost the entire range of morphological variation in an observed trait known for that species. Several characters by recent literature claimed to be suitable for distinguishing varieties or even species were proven to be dependent on environmental conditions and to be highly unreliable markers for the delimiation of taxa. The unsatisfactory taxonomy that results when such classification of phenotypes is adopted is illustrated by three examples from recent literature. Phenotypic plasticity was found to be the main source of morphological variation within the species ofPotamogeton, having much more influence than morphological differences caused by different genotypes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allsopp A. (1965): Land and water forms: physiological aspects.Handb. Pflanzenphysiol. (Encyc. Plant Physiol.) 15: 1236–1255.
Ascherson P. &Graebner P. (1897):Synopsis der mitteleuropäischen Flora 1. Wilhelm Engelman, Leipzig.
Bradshaw A.D. (1965): Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants.Advances Genet. 13: 115–155.
Busik V.V. (1979): SemejstvoPotamogetonaceae — Rdestovye. In:Malyshev L.I. &Peshkova G.A. (eds.),Flora Tsentral’noi Sibiri (Flora of Central Siberia) 1, Nauka, Novosibirsk, pp. 57–65 & 444–445.
Calder J.A. &Taylor R.L. (1965): New taxa and nomenclatural changes with respect to the Flora of the Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia.Canad. J. Bot. 43: 1387–1400.
Casper S. J. &Krausch H.-D. (1980):Pteridophyta undAnthophyta. 1. Teil:Lycopodiaceae bisOrchidaceae. In:Ettl H., Gerloff J. &Heynig H. (eds.),Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 23, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart & New York, pp. 1–403.
Chen Y.D. (1987): Studies on thePotamogetonaceae in Qinghai Lake.Acta Hydrobiol. Sin. 11: 228–235.
Cox J. (1997): Terrestrial form ofMyriophyllum alterniflorum.Bot. Soc. Brit. Isles News 77: 36–37.
Dandy J.E. (1937): The genusPotamogeton L. in tropical Africa.J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 50: 507–540.
Dandy J.E. (1958):List of British vascular plants. Brit. Museum, London.
Dandy J.E. (1971):Potamogetonaceae. In:Rechinger K.H. (ed.),Flora Iranica 83, Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, Graz, pp. 1–9.
Dandy J.E. (1980): 1.Potamogeton L. In:Tutin T.G., Heywood V.H., Burges N.A., Moore D.M., Valentine D.H., Walters S.M. &Webb D.A. (eds.),Flora Europaea 5, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 7–11.
Davis P.H. &Heywood V.H. (1963):Principles of angiosperm taxonomy. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
Fieber F.X. (1838):PotamogetonDiosc. In:Berchtold F.G. & Opiz P.M. (eds.),Oekonomisch-technische Flora Böhmens 2/1, Prag, pp. 242–287.
Fischer G. (1904): Beitrag zur Kenntnis der bayerischen Potamogetoneen. IV.Mitt. Bayer. Bot. Ges., München 1: 356–366 & 375–388.
Fischer G. (1905): Beitrag zur Kenntnis der bayerischen Potamogetoneen. V.Mitt. Bayer. Bot. Ges., München 1: 471–475.
Fischer G. (1907): Die bayerischen Potamogetonen und Zannichellien.Ber. Bayer. Bot. Ges. 11: 20–162.
Fries E.M. (1828):Novitiae florae suecicae. Ed. 2. Londini Gothorum.
Fryer A. (1890): Supposed hybridity inPotamogeton.J. Bot. 28: 173–179.
Fryer A. (1894):Potamogeton polygonifolius v.pseudo-fluitans.J. Bot. 32: 97–100.
Fryer A. (1898):The Potamogetons (Pond Weeds) of the British Isles. London. [pp. 1–24, t. 1–12]
Fryer A. (1900):The Potamogetons (Pond Weeds) of the British Isles. London. [pp. 37–56, t. 25–36]
Fryer A. & Bennett A. (1915):The Potamogetons (Pond Weeds) of the British Isles. London.
Galinis V. (1963): 1 šeima. Pludiniai —PotamogetonaceaeEngl. In:Natkevicaite-IvanauskieneM. (ed.),Lietuvos TSR Flora 2, Lietuvos TSR Mokslu Akad., Vilnius, pp. 35–84 & 677.
Galinis V. (1969): Novae formaePotamogetonum in flora RSS Lituaniae.Lietuvos T.S.R. Mokslu Akad. Biol. Inst. Darb., Biol. 9: 43–60.
Glück H. (1936): Pteridophyten und Phanerogamen. In:Pascher A. (ed.),Süsswasserflora Mitteleuropas 15, Jena.
Graebner P. (1907): 4.Potamogeton (Tourn.) L. In:Engler A. (ed.),Das Pflanzenreich, Regni vegetabilis conspectus 31 (IV.11), Berlin, pp. 39–142, 161–162.
Hagström J.O. (1916): Critical researches on the Potamogetons.Kungl. Svenska Vetenskapsakad. Handl. 55(5): 1–281.
Hagström J.O. (1922): 14 Fam.Potamogetonaceæ. In:Holmberg O.R. (ed.),Hartman’s handbok i skandinaviens flora 1 (Hartman’s handbook of Scandinavian flora), Stockholm, pp. 80–104.
Hara H. (1985): Comments on the East Asiatic plants (17).J. Jap. Bot. 60: 230–238.
Haynes R.R. (1974): A revision of North AmericanPotamogeton subsectionPusilli (Potamogetonaceae).Rhodora 76: 564–649.
Haynes R.R. &Hellquist C. B. (1996): New combinations in North AmericanAlismatidae.Novon 6: 370–371.
Hultén E. (1937):Flora of the Aleutean Islands. Stockholm.
Hultén E. (1941):Flora of Alaska and Yukon I. Lund.
Hultén E. (1964): The circumpolar plants. Vol. 1. Vascular cryptogams, conifers, monocotyledons.Kungl. Svenska Vetenskapsakad. Handl., Ser. 4, 8(5): 1–280.
Idestam-Almquist J. &Kautsky L. (1995): Plastic responses in morphology ofPotamogeton pectinatus L. to sediment and above-sediment conditions at two sites in the northern Baltic proper.Aquatic Bot. 52: 205–216.
Jupp B.P. &Spence D.H.N. (1977): Limitation of macrophytes in a eutrophic lake, Loch Leven. II: Wave action, sediments and waterfowl grazing.J. Ecol. 65: 431–446.
Kalkman L. &van Wijk R. J. (1984): On the variation on chromosome number inPotamogeton pectinatus L.Aquatic Bot. 20: 343–349.
Kaplan Z. (2001):Potamogeton ×fluitans (P. natans ×P. lucens) in the Czech Republic. I. Morphology and anatomy.Preslia 73: 333–340.
Kapp E. (1978): 118. — Potamogétonacées. In:Guinochet M. &de Vilmorin R. (eds.),Flore de France 3, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, pp. 870–879.
Kashina L.I. (Kaschina L.I.) (1988): Semeistvo 24.Potamogetonaceae — Rdestovye. In:Krasnoborov I.M. (ed.),Flora Sibiri, Lycopodiaceae —Hydrocharitaceae, Nauka, Novosibirsk, pp. 93–105 & 165–176.
Kautsky L. (1987): Life-cycles of three populationsPotamogeton pectinatus L., at different degrees of wave exposure in the Askö area, northern Baltic proper.Aquatic Bot. 27: 177–186.
Kautsky L. (1991): In situ experiments on interrelationships between six brackish macrophyte species.Aquatic Bot. 39: 159–172.
Krahulec F. &Kaplan Z. (1995): Diversity ofPotamogeton species during 21 years of succession in a new water reservoir.Preslia 66: 237–241.
Krahulec F. &Lepš J. (1993): The migration of vascular plants to a new water reservoir: geografic relationships.Preslia 65: 147–162.
Krahulec F. &Lepš J. (1994): Establishment success of plant immigrants in a new water reservoir.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 29: 3–14.
Krahulec F., Lepš J. &Rauch O. (1980): Vegetation of the Rozkoš reservoir near Česká Skalice (East Bohemia). 1. The vegetation development during the first five years after its filling.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 15: 321–362.
Krahulec F., Lepš J. &Rauch O. (1987): Vegetation succesion on a new lowland reservoir.Arch. Hydrobiol., Beih. Ergebnisse Limnol. 27: 83–93.
Lansdown R.W. (1999): A terrestrial form ofCallitriche truncataGuss. subsp.occidentalis (Rouy)Braun-Blanquet (Callitrichaceae).Watsonia 22: 283–286.
Les D.H. &Haynes R.R. (1996):Coleogeton (Potamogetonaceae), a new genus of Pondweeds.Novon 6: 389–391.
Maberly S.C. (1993): Morphological and photosynthetic characteristics ofPotamogeton obtusifolius from different depths.J. Aquatic Pl. Managem. 31: 34–39.
Mäemets A. (1984): 6.PotamogetonaceaeDumort. In:EichwaldK. et al. (eds.),Eesti NSV floora (Flora of Estonia) 9, Valgus, Tallinn, pp. 46–139.
Markgraf F. (1981): FamiliePotamogetonaceae, Laichkrautgewächse. In:Markgraf F. (ed.),Hegi, Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa 1/2, Ed. 3, Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin & Hamburg, pp. 214–246.
Mertens F.C. & Koch W.D.J. (1823):J.C. Röhlings Deutschlands Flora 1. Ed. 3. Frankfurt.
Meyer A. (1987): Phenotypic plasticity and heterochrony inCichlasoma managuense and their implications for speciation in cichlid fisches.Evolution 41: 1357–1369.
Muenscher W.C. (1944):Aquatic plants of the United States. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Nevečeřal P. &Krahulec F. (1994): Dva noví zástupci roduPotamogeton ve flóře České republiky:P. polygonifolius aP. ×lintonii (P. crispus ×friesii) (TwoPotamogeton taxa new to the flora of the Czech Republic:P. polygonifolius andP. ×lintonii (P. crispus ×friesii)).Preslia 66: 151–158.
Ogden E.C. (1943): The broad-leaved species ofPotamogeton of North America north of Mexico.Rhodora 45: 57–105, 119–163 & 171–214.
Ogden E.C. (1974):Potamogeton in New York.New York State Mus. Sci. Serv. Bull. 423: 1–20.
Ogg A.G. Jr.,Bruns V.F. &Kelly A.D. (1969): Response of sago pondweed to periodic removal of top growth.Weed Sci. 17: 139–141. [n. v.; cit. afterSpencer & Ksander 1990]
Papchenkov V.G. (1997): Zametki oPotamogeton gramineus s.l. (Potamogetonaceae) (Notes onPotamogeton gramineus s. l. (Potamogetonaceae)).Bot. Zhurn. 82(12): 65–76.
Pearsall W.H. &Hanby A.M. (1925): The variation of leaf form inPotamogeton perfoliatus.New Phytol. 24: 112–120.
Pigliucci M., Politi M. G. &Bellincampi D. (1991): Implications of phenotypic plasticity for numerical taxonomy ofOrnithogalum montanum (Liliaceae).Canad. J. Bot. 69: 34–38.
Pignatti S. (1982):Flora d’Italia 3. Edagricole, Bologna.
Preston C.D. (1988): Alfred Fryer and the study of the genusPotamogeton of the British Isles.Arch. Nat. Hist. 15(1): 15–33.
Preston C.D. (1995):Pondweeds of Great Britain and Ireland. BSBI, London.
Preston C.D. &Croft J.M. (1997):Aquatic plants in Britain and Ireland. Harley Books, Colchester.
Raunkiaer C. (1903): AnatomicalPotamogeton-studies andPotamogeton fluitans.Bot. Tidssk. 25: 253–280.
Reichenbach L. (1845):Icones florae Germanicae et Helveticae 7. Isoeteae — Gramineae. Lipsiae.
Schmid B. (1983): Notes on the nomenclature and taxonomy of theCarex flava group in Europe.Watsonia 14: 309–319.
Schmid B. (1992): Phenotypic variation in plants.Evol. Trends Pl. 6: 45–60.
Scoggan H.J. (1979):The flora of Canada. Part 2: Pteridophyta, Gymnospermae, Monocotyledonae. National Museum, Ottawa. (“1978”)
Sergievskaya L.P. (1966):Flora Zabajkal’ya (Flora of Zabajkalje) 1.Polypodiaceae — Butomaceae. Izdatel’stvo Tomskogo universiteta, Tomsk.
Simpson D.A. (1988): Phenotypic plasticity ofElodea nuttallii (Planch.)H. St. John andElodea canadensisMichx. in the British Isles.Watsonia 17: 121–132.
Soó R. (1934): A magyar vizek virágos vegetációjának rendszertani és szociologiai áttekintése II (Zur Systematik und Soziologie der Phanerogamen Vegetation der ungarischen Bìnnengewässer II).Magy. Biol. Kutat., Int. Osztál. Munkái 7(1934): 135–153.
Soó R. (1936): A magyar vizek virágos vegetációjának rendszertani és szociologiai áttekintése III (Zur Systematik und Soziologie der Phanerogamen Vegetation der ungarischen Binnengewässer III).Magyar Biol. Kutatóint. Munkái 8(1935–1936): 223–240.
Soó R. (1938a): Die Arten und Formen der GattungPotamogeton in der Flora des historischen Ungarn. I.Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 45(5)/19–21: 65–78.
Soó R. (1938b): Die Arten und Formen der GattungPotamogeton in der Flora des historischen Ungarn. II.Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 45(5)/22–25: 244–256.
Soó R. (1971): Species et combinationes novae florae europae praecipue Hungariae IX.Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung. 16(1970): 363–372.
Spence D.H. N. &Dale H.M. (1978): Variations in the shallow water form ofPotamogeton richardsonii induced by some environmental factors.Freshwater Biol. 8: 251–268.
Spencer D.F. (1987): Tuber size and planting depth influence growth ofPotamogeton pectinatus L.Amer. Midl. Naturalist 118: 77–84.
Spencer D.F. &Ksander G.G. (1990a): Influence of planting depth onPotamogeton gramineus L.Aquatic Bot. 36: 343–350.
Spencer D.F. &Ksander G.G. (1990b): Influence of temperature, light and nutrient limitation on anthocyanin content ofPotamogeton gramineus L.Aquatic Bot. 38: 357–367.
Spencer D.F. &Ksander G.G. (1991): Influence of temperature and light on early growth ofPotamogeton gramineus L.J. Freshwater Ecol. 6: 227–235.
Spencer D.F., Anderson L.W.J. &Ksander G.G. (1994): Field and greenhouse investigations on winter bud production byPotamogeton gramineus L.Aquatic Bot. 48: 285–296.
Suessenguth K. (1936): Phanerógamae. Blüten- oder Samenpflanzen.Gymnospermae undMonocotyledones I. (Typhaceae bisGraminae). In:Hegi G. (ed.),Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa 1, Ed. 2, Carl Hansen Verlag, München, pp. 102–520.
Sultan S. E. (1995): Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation.Acta Bot. Neerl. 44: 363–383.
Topa E. (1966): Fam. 112.PotamogetonaceaeA.L. Juss. In:SąvulescuT. (ed.),Flora republicii socialiste Romania (Flora of Romania) 11, Acad. Reip. Soc. Rom., Bucuresti, pp. 54–88.
Tur N. M. (1982): Revisión del géneroPotamogeton L. en la Argentina.Darwiniana 24: 217–265.
Tzvelev N.N. (1987): Sem. 136. Rdestovye —PotamogetonaceaeDumort. In:KharkevichS.S. (Charkevicz S.S.) (ed.),Sosudistye rasteniya sovetskogo Dal’nego Vostoka (Plantae vasculares Orientis extremi Sovietici) 2, Nauka, Leningrad, pp. 317–335.
Tzvelev N.N. (1996): O vidakh podrodaColeogeton rodaPotamogeton (Potamogetonaceae) v severo-zapadnoi Rossii (On the species of the subgenusColeogeton of the genusPotamogeton (Potamogetonaceae) in north-western Russia).Bot. Zhurn. 81(7): 88–91.
Tzvelev N. (2000a): Novye kombinatsii taksonov sosudistykh rastenii (Combinationes novae taxorum plantarum vascularium).Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast. 32: 181–185.
Tzvelev N.N. (2000b):Opredelitel’ sosudistykh rastenii Severo-Zapadnoi Rossii (Leningradskaya, Pskovskaya i Novgorodskaya oblasti) (Manual of the vascular plants of North-West Russia (Leningrad, Pskov and Novgorod provinces)). SPChFA, Sankt-Peterburg.
Van Wijk R.J. (1988): Ecological studies onPotamogeton pectinatus L. I. General characteristics, biomass production and life cycles under field conditions.Aquatic Bot. 31: 211–258.
Van Wijk R.J. (1989): Ecological studies onPotamogeton pectinatus L. III. Reproductive strategies and germination ecology.Aquatic Bot. 33: 271–299.
Volobaev P.A. (1991): O dvukh taxonach rodaPotamogeton L. iz Sibiri (On two taxa ofPotamogeton from Siberia).Sibirsk. Biol. Zhurn. 1991: 75–76.
Wiegleb G. &Kaplan Z. (1998): An account of the species ofPotamogeton L. (Potamogetonaceae).Folia Geobot. 33: 241–316.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaplan, Z. Phenotypic plasticity inPotamogeton (Potamogetonaceae) . Folia Geobot 37, 141–170 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804229
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804229