Summary
A new histological grading system with prognostic correlation for pancreatic cancer was proposed by Klöppel et al. in 1985. Histological sections from 60 ductal adenocarcinomas operated on between January 1980 and December 1990 were retrospectively reviewed in order to compare Klöppel's grading with standard TNM's grading and assess their prognostic value. Klöppel grading was determined through the following histologic and cytologic factors: number duct-like structures, mucus production, neoplastic epithelium, arrangement and pleomorphism of nuclei, and mitotic activity. A score from 0 (well differentiated) to 2 (poorly differentiated) was given to each factor. The mean value obtained dividing the sum of the different values by the number of parameters was used to construct a malignancy scale and therefore allocate each patient to his Klöppel grading. The concordance index K between the two grading systems was relevant (K=0.85p<0.001). There was no relation either between gradings (Klöppel or TNM) and preoperative duration of symptoms or between gradings and UICC stages. TNM's G2 grades of malignancy, N status, and tumor stage were significantly related to survival time (p<0.05). Klöppel's grading does not show any advantage over the classical and simpler TNM's grading, even though it can be considered more objective and therefore more easily reproducible. This characteristic further should be enhanced by the introduction of a malignancy scale such as the “mean value”.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Lack EE, Khettry U, Legg MA. The pancreas and extraepatic biliary system, inPrinciples and Practice of Surgical Pathology. Silverberg SG, ed., Churchill-Livingstone, 1990; 1347–1395.
Williamson RCN. Pancreatic cancer: the greatest oncological challenge.BJM 1988; 296: 445,446.
Herrera MF, Van Heerden JA, Katzmann JA, Weiland LH, Nagorney M, Ilstrup D. Evaluation of DNA nuclear pattern as a prognostic determinant in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Ann Surg 1992; 215: 120–124.
Klöppel G, Lingenthal G, Von Bolow M, Kern HF. Histological and fine structure features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in relation to growth and prognosis: studies in xenografted tumours and clinico-histopathological correlation in a series of 75 cases.Histopathology 1985; 9: 841–856.
Hermanek P, Sobin LH.UICC Classification of Malignant Tumors. 4th ed., Springer, Berlin, 1989.
Mannel A, Weiland LH, Van Heerden JA, Ilstrup DM. Factors influencing survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.Ann Surg 1987; 206: 366–373.
Eskelinen M, Lipponen P, Marin S, Haapasalo H, Makinen K, Ahtola H, Puittinen J, Nuutinen P, Alhava E. Prognostic factors in human pancreatic cancer, with special reference to quantitative histology.Scand J Gastroenterol 1991; 26: 483–490.
Connolly MM, Dawson PJ, Michelassi F. Survival in 1001 patients with carcinoma of the pancreas.Ann Surg 1987; 206: 366–373.
Manabe T, Ohshio G, Baba N, Tobe T. Factors influencing prognosis and indications for curative pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.Int J Pancreatol 1990; 7: 187–193.
Sandberg AA, Ishe I. Factors influencing survival after total pancreatectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer.Ann Surg 1983; 198: 605–610.
Michelassi F, Erroi F, Dawson PJ, Pietrabissa A, Noda S, Handcock M, Block GE. Experience with 647 consecutive tumors of the duodenum, ampulla, head of the pancreas and distal common bile duct.Ann Surg 1989; 210: 544–554.
Cameron JL, Crist DW, Sitzmann JV, Hruban RH, Boitnott JK, Seilder AJ, Coleman JA. Factors influencing survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.Am J Surg 1991; 161: 120–125.
Hermreck AS, Thomas CY, Friensen SR. Importance of pathologic staging in the surgical management of adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas.Am J Surg 1974; 127: 653–657.
Sato T, Saitoh Y, Noto N, Matsuno S. Factors influencing late results of operation for carcinoma of the pancreas.Am J Surg 1978; 136: 582–586.
Dixon WJ, Brown MB, Engelman L, Hill MA, Jennrich RI. BMDP.Statistical Software Manual. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1988.
Grace PA, Pitt HA, Tompkins RK, Den Besten L, Longmire WP. Decreased morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy.Am J Surg 1986; 151: 141–149.
Crist DW, Sitzmann JV, Cameron JL. Improved hospital morbidity, mortality and survival after Whipple procedure.Ann Surg 1987; 206: 358–365.
Pellegrini CA, Heck CF, Raper S, Way LW. An analysis of the reduced morbidity and mortality rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Arch Surg 1989; 124: 778–781.
Van Heerden JA. Pancreatic resection for carcinoma of the pancreas: Whipple versus Total pancreatectomy. An Institutional perspective.World J Surg 1984; 8: 880–888.
Trede M, Schwall G. The complications of pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 1987; 207: 39–47.
Peters JH, Carey LC. Historical review of pancreaticoduodenectomy.Am J Surg 1991; 161: 219–225.
Cohen JR, Kuchta N, Galler N, Shires T, Dineen P. Pancreatoduodenectomy. A 40-year experience.Ann Surg 1982; 195: 608–617.
Warshaw AL, Swanson RS. Pancreatic cancer in 1988. Possibilities and probabilities.Ann Surg 1988; 208: 541–553.
Gudjonsson B, Livstone EM, Spiro HM. Cancer of the pancreas. Diagnostic accuracy and survival statistics.Cancer 1978; 42: 2494–2504.
Carter DC. Cancer of the pancreas.GUT 1990; 31: 494–496.
Trapnell JE. Staging of cancer of the pancreas.Int J Pancreatol 1990; 7: 109–116.
Klinkenbij JHG, Jeekel J, Schmitz PIM, Rombout PAR, Nix GAJJ, Bruining HA, Van Blankenstein M. Carcinoma of the pancreas and periampullary region: palliation versus cure.Br J Surg 1993; 80: 1575–1578.
Tannapfel A, Wittekind C, Hunefeld G. Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Histopathological features and prognosis.Int J Pancreatol 1992; 12: 145–152.
Tsuchiya R, Tsunoda T. Tumor size as a predictive factor.Int J Pancreatol 1990; 7: 117–123.
Tsunoda T, Ura K, Eto T, Matsumoto T, Tsuchiya R. UICC and Japanese stage classification for carcinoma of the pancreas.Int J Pancreatol 1991; 8: 205–214.
Costa J, Wesley RA, Glatstein E. The grading of soft tissue sarcomas. Results of a clinico-histopathologic correlation in a series of 163 cases.Cancer 1984; 53: 530–541.
Bocking A, Kiehn J, Heinzel-Wach M. Combined histological grading of prostatic carcinoma.Cancer 1982; 50: 288–294.
Brawn PN, Aiala AG, Von Eschennbach AC. Histologic grading of prostate adenocarcinoma: development of a new system and comparison with other methods. A preliminary study.Cancer 1982; 49: 525.
Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Kurman RJ. Relationships between surgical pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: a gynaecologic oncology group study.Gynaecol Oncol 1991; 40: 55–65.
Farir WR, Fuks ZY, Scher HI. Cancer of the bladder, inCancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. Vincent T De Vita, ed., JB Lippincott, 1993; 1052–1072.
Weger AR, Falkmer UG, Schwab G, Glaser K, Kemmler G, Bodner E, Aver GV, Mikuz G. Nuclear DNA distribution pattern of the parenchymal cells in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and in chronic pancreatitis. A study of archival specimens using both image and flow cytometry.Gastroenterology 1990; 99: 237–242.
Sciallero S, Giaretti W, Geido E, Bonelli L, Zhaukui L, Saccomanno S, Zeraschi E, Pugliese U. DNA aneuploidy is an independent factor of poor prognosis in pancreatic and peripancreatic cancer.Int J Pancreatol 1993; 14: 21–28.
Matsuno S, Sato T. Surgical treatment of carcinoma of the pancreas. Experience in 272 cases.Am J Surg 1986; 152: 499–503.
Lack EE. Primary tumors of the exocrine pancreas. Classification overview and recent contributions by immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy.Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13 (Suppl 1): 6–68.
Yoshimura T, Manabe T, Tajason H. Nuclear DNA content as a prognostic predictor in carcinoma of the pancreas.Int J Pancreatol 1993; 14: 29–36.
Waldman FM, Chew K, Ljung BM. A comparison between bromodeossyuridine and 3-H-Thymidine labeling in human breast tumors.Mod Pathol 1991; 4: 718–722.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giulianotti, P.C., Boggi, U., Fornaciari, G. et al. Prognostic value of histological grading in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. International Journal of Pancreatology 17, 279–289 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02785825
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02785825