Abstract
The mating system of the longnose filefish,Oxymonacanthus longirostris, was examined on coral reefs of Okinawa, Japan. This species has been shown previously to be monogamous. Fish were usually found swimming together in heterosexual pairs with the male and female sharing the same feeding territory. However, both monogamous and polygynous (bigamous) males were found in the present study. Polygynous males, which were larger than monogamous males, visited and stayed several minutes in turn with each female within the territories. Although most males were monogamous in the early breeding season, over 20% of males mated polygynously in the late breeding season. The adult sex ratio in the former was unbiased, but became slightly female-biased toward the end of the breeding season because of the higher disappearance rate of males. The higher disappearance rate may be due mainly to a higher mortality rate of males resulting from a greater deterioration of physical condition during the breeding season. Thus, the mating system varied with the change of the adult sex ratio. Plasticity in the mating system of this species may be the outcome of male mating tactic depending on local mate availability.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alatalo, R.V., A. Carlson, A. Lundberg & S. Ulfstrand 1981 The conflict between male polygamy and female monogamy: the case of the pied flycatcherFicedula hypoleuca.Am. Nat. 117: 738–753.
Barlow, G.W. 1987 Spawning, eggs and larvae of the longnose filefishOxymonacanthus longirostris, a monogamous corallivore.Env. Biol. Fish. 20: 183–194.
Barlow, G.W. 1988 Monogamy in relation to resources. In: C.N. Slobodchikoff (ed.)The Ecology of Social Behavior. pp. 55–79. Academic Press, London.
Clutton-Brock, T.H. 1989 Mammalian mating systems.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 236: 339–372.
Clutton-Brock, T.H. & P.H. Harvey 1978 Mammals, resources and reproductive strategies.Nature 273: 191–195.
Davies, N.B. 1991 Mating systems. In: J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davies (eds.)Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 3rd edn. pp. 263–294. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
Deutsch, C.J., M.P. Haley & B.J. Le Boeuf 1990 Reproductive effort of male northern elephant seals: estimates from mass loss.Can. J. Zool. 68: 2580–2593.
Donaldson, T.J. 1989 Facultative monogamy in obligate coral-dwelling hawkfishes (Cirrhitidae).Env. Biol. Fish. 26: 295–302.
Emlen, S.T. & L.W. Oring 1977 Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating system.Science 197: 215–223.
Fricke, H.W. 1986 Pair swimming and mutual partner guarding in monogamous butterflyfish (Pisces, Chaetodontidae): a joint advertisement for territory.Ethology 73: 307–333.
Hannon, S.J. 1984 Factors limiting polygyny in the willow ptarmigan.Anim. Behav. 32: 153–161.
Hourigan, T.F. 1989 Environmental determinants of butterflyfish social systems.Env. Biol. Fish. 25: 61–78.
Kawase, H. & A. Nakazono 1994 Reproductive behavior of the flagtail triggerfish,Sufflamen chrysopterus. Proc. 7th Int. Coral Reef Symp. Guam : 915–917.
Keenleyside, M.H.A. 1985 Bigamy and mate choice in the biparental cichlid fishCichlasoma nigrofasciatum.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17: 285–290.
Keenleyside, M.H.A., R.C. Bailey & V.H. Young 1990 Variation in the mating system and associated parental behavior of captive and free-livingCichlasoma nigrofasciatum (Pisces, Cichlidae).Behaviour 112: 202–221.
Kuwamura, T. 1996 The evolution of parental care and mating systems among Tanganyika cichlids. In: H. Kawanabe, M. Hori and M. Nagoshi (eds).Fish Communities in Lake Tanganyika. pp. 59–86. Kyoto University Press, Kyoto.
Lott, D.A. 1991 Intraspecific Variation in the Social Systems of Wild Vertebrates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Maekawa, K., K. Iguchi & O. Katano 1996 Reproductive success in male Japanese minnows,Pseudorasbora parva: observations under experimental conditions.Ichthyol. Res. 43: 257–266.
Matsuura, K. 1984 Tetraodontiforms. In: H. Masuda, K. Amaoka, C. Araga, T. Uyeno and T. Yoshino (eds.)The Fishes of the Japanese Archipelago, English text and plate. pp. 357–366, pls. 321–334. Tokai University Press, Tokyo.
Møller, A.P. 1986 Mating systems among European passerines: a review.Ibis 128: 234–250.
Neudecker, S. & P.S. Lobel 1982 Mating systems of chaetodontid and pomacanthid fishes at St. Croix.Z. Tierpsychol. 59: 299–318.
Oda, T. 1992 Monogamous mating system of the longnose filefish,Oxymonacanthus longirostris. M. Sci. Thesis, Ehime University. 28 pp. (in Japanese).
Petersen, C.W. 1990 The relationships among population density, individual size, mating tactics, and reproductive success in a hermaphroditic fish,Serranus fasciatus.Behaviour 113: 57–80.
Petit, L.J. 1991 Experimentally induced polygyny in a monogamous bird species: prothonotary warblers and the polygyny threshold.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29: 177–187.
Promislow, D.E.L. 1992 Costs of sexual selection in natural populations of mammals.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 247: 203–210.
Reynolds, J.D. 1996 Animal breeding systems.Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 92–98.
Robertson, D.R., N.V.C. Polunin & K. Leighton 1979 The behavioral ecology of three Indian Ocean surgeonfishes (Acanthurus lineatus, A. leucosternon & Zebrasoma scopas): their feeding strategies, and social and mating systems.Env. Biol. Fish. 4: 125–170.
Sano, M., M. Shimizu & Y. Nose 1984 Food habits of Teleostean reef fishes in Okinawa Islands, southern Japan.Univ. Mus., Univ. Tokyo, Bull. 25: 1–128.
van den Berghe, E.P. 1992 Parental care and the cost of reproduction in a Mediterranean fish.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30: 373–378.
Veiga, J.P. 1992 Why are house sparrows predominantly monogamous? A test of hypotheses.Anim. Behav. 43: 361–370.
Yabuta, S. 1997 Spawning migrations in the monogamous butterflyfish,Chaetodon trifasciatus.Ichthyol. Res. 44: 177–182.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Kokita, T., Nakazono, A. Plasticity in the mating system of the longnose filefish,Oxymonacanthus longirostris, in relation to mate availability. J Ethol 16, 81–89 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769286
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769286