Abstract
Males of Dawson’s burrowing bees (Amegilla dawsoni) search for virgin females at three locations: (1) open clay patches where females are emerging from underground brood cells, (2) the vegetated peripheral zone adjacent to emergence areas (through which females pass after emerging), and (3) clusters of flowering plants, which are often some distance from emergence areas. Males of Dawson’s burrowing bees exhibit a size dimorphism with large major and small minors. Major males patrol only the open emergence sites, whereas minor males may be found in all three locations. Although most females are mounted and presumably mated immediately upon emergence, some are not, and these females make up a pool of potential mates for the small males patrolling the peripheral zone and flower patches. The density of males at emergence sites and the probability of male-male aggression change over the course of a day and over the entire flight season. When the level of competition is low, some minor males hunt for mates at emergence areas, where potential mates are relatively numerous. But when the presence of many large rivals makes it unlikely that a small male can avoid being displaced from emerging females, minors make the best of a bad job by shifting to areas where majors are absent.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alcock, J. (1996a). The relation between male body size, fighting, and mating success in Dawson’s burrowing bee,Amegilla dawsoni (Apidae, Apinae, Anthophorini).J. Zool. 239: 663–674.
Alcock, J. (1996b). Provisional rejection of three alternative hypotheses on the maintenance of a size dichotomy in males of Dawson’s burrowing bee,Amegilla dawsoni (Apidae, Anthophorini).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39: 181–188.
Alcock, J. (1996c). Small males emerge earlier than large males in Dawson’s burrowing bees (Amegilla dawsoni) (Hymenoptera: Anthophorini).J. Zool. (in press).
Alcock, J., Jones, C. E. and Buchmann, S. L. (1977). Male mating strategies in the beeCentris pallida Fox (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae).Am. Nat. 111: 145–155.
Andersson, M. (1994).Sexual Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Barthell, J. F., and Daly, H. V. (1995). Male size variation and mating site fidelity in a population ofHabropoda depressa Fowler (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae).Pan-Pac. Entomol. 71: 149–156.
Borgia, G. (1980). Sexual competition inScatophaga stercoraria: Size- and density-related changes in male ability to capture females.Behaviour 75: 185–205.
Crespi, B. J. (1986). Size assessment and alternative fighting tactics inElaphrothrips tuberculatus (Insecta: Thysanoptera).Anim. Behav. 34: 1324–1335.
Danforth, B. N. (1991). The morphology and behavior of dimorphic males inPerdita portalis (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29: 235–247.
Dawkins, R. (1980). Good strategy or evolutionarily stable strategy? In Barlow, G. W., and Silverberg, S. (eds.),Sociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture? Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 331–367.
Dominey, W. J. (1984). Alternative mating tactics and evolutionary stable strategies.Am. Zool. 24: 384–396.
Eberhard, W. G. (1982). Beetle horn dimorphism: making the best of a bad lot.Am. Nat. 119: 420–426.
Goldsmith, S. K. (1987). The mating system and alternative reproductive behaviors ofDendrobias mandibularis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20: 111–115.
Gross, M. R. (1996). Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: Diversity within the sexes.Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 92–98.
Houston, T. F. (1991). Ecology and behaviour of the beeAmegilla (Asaropoda) dawsoni (Rayment) with notes on a related species (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae).Rec. West. Aus. Mus. 15: 591–609.
Larsson, F. E., and Tengo, J. (1989). The effects of temperature and body size on the mating pattern of a gregariously nesting bee,Colletes cunicularius (Hymenoptera: Colletidae).Ecol. Entomol. 14: 279–286.
May, M. L. (1976). Warming rates as a function of body size in periodic endotherms.J. Comp. Physiol. 111: 55–70.
O’Neill, K. M., and Evans, H. E. (1983). Alternative mating tactics inBembicinus quinquespinosus (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae): Correlation with size and color variation.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14: 39–46.
O’Neill, K. M., Evans, H. E., and O’Neill, R. P. (1989). Phenotypic correlates of mating success in the sand waspBembicinus quinquespinosus (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae).Can. J. Zool. 67: 2557–2568.
Parker, G. A. (1970). The reproductive behaviour and the nature of sexual selection inScatophaga stercoraria L. IV. Epigamic recognition and competition between males for the possession of females.Behaviour 37: 113–139.
Rasmussen, J. L. (1994). The influence of horn and body size on the reproductive behavior of the horned rainbow scarab beetlePhanaeus difformis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).J. Insect Behav. 7: 67–82.
Sigurjónsdóttir, H., and Snorrason, S. S. (1995). Distribution of male yellow dungflies around oviposition sites: the effect of body size.Ecol. Entomol. 20: 84–90.
Stone, G. N., and Willmer, P. G. (1989). Warm-up rates and body temperatures in bees: The importance of body size, thermal regime and phylogeny.J. Exp. Biol. 147: 303–328.
Stone, G. N., Loder, P. M. J., and Blackburn, T. M. (1995). Foraging and courtship behavior in males of the solitary beeAnthophora plumipes (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae): Thermal physiology and the role of body size.Ecol. Entomol. 20: 169–183.
Stubblefield, J. W., and Seger, J. (1994). Sexual dimorphism in the Hymenoptera. In Short, R. V., and Balaban, E. (eds),The Differences between the Sexes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 71–103.
Thornhill, R. (1981).Panorpa (Mecoptera: Panorpidae) scorpionflies: Systems for understanding resource-defence polygyny and alternative male reproductive efforts.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 355–386.
Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983).The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Ward, P. I. (1983). The effects of size on the mating behaviour of the dung flySepsis cynipsea.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13: 75–80.
West-Eberhard, M. J. (1979). Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution.Proc. Philos. Soc. Am. 123: 222–2234.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alcock, J. Competition from large males and the alternative mating tactics of small males of dawson’s burrowing bee (Amegilla dawsoni) (apidae, apinae, anthophorini). J Insect Behav 10, 99–113 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765477
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765477