Abstract
Body-weight estimates of fossil primates are commonly used to infer many important aspects of primate paleobiology, including diet, ecology, and relative encephalization. It is important to examine carefully the methodologies and problems associated with such estimates and the degree to which one can have confidence in them. New regression equations for predicting body weight in fossil primates are given which provide body-weight estimates for most nonhominid primate species in the fossil record. The consequences of using different subgroups (evolutionary “grades”) of primate species to estimate fossil-primate body weights are explored and the implications of these results for interpreting the primate fossil record are discussed. All species (fossil and extant) were separated into the following “grades”: prosimian grade, monkey grade, ape grade, anthropoid grade, and all-primates grade. Regression equations relating lower molar size to body weight for each of these grades were then calculated. In addition, a female-anthropoid grade regression was also calculated for predicting body weight infernales of extinct, sexually dimorphic anthropoid species. These equations were then used to generate the fossil-primate body weights. In many instances, the predicted fossil-primate body weights differ substantially from previous estimates.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Blumenburg, B. (1981). Observations on the paleoecology, population sltructure and body weight of some Tertiary hominoids.J. hum. Evol. 10: 543–564.
Blumenburg, B. (1984). Allometry and evolution of Tertiary hominoids.J. hum. Evol. 13: 613–676.
Bown, T. (1979). New omomyid primates from middle Eocene rocks of west-central Hot Springs county, Wyoming.Folia primatol. 31: 48–73.
Bown, T., and Rose, K. (1976). New early Tertiary primates and a reappraisal of some Plesiadapiformes.Folia primatol. 26: 109–138.
Bown, T., and Rose, K. (1984). Reassessment of some early Eocene Omomyidae, with description of a new genus and three new species.Folia primatol. 43: 97–112.
Cachel, S. (1983). Diet of the Oligocene anthropoidsAegyptopithecus andApidium.Primates 24: 109–117.
Calder, W. (1984).Size, Function, and Life History, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Colbert, E. (1937). A new primate from the Upper Pondaung formation of Burma.Am. Mus. Novit. 951: 1–18.
Fleagle, J. (1978). Size distribution of living and fossil primate faunas.Paleobiology 4: 67–76.
Garn, S., and Lewis, A. (1958). Tooth-size, body-size and “giant” fossil man.Am. Anthropol. 60: 874–880.
Garn, S., Lewis, A., and Kerewsky, R. (1968). The magnitude and implications of the relationship between tooth size and body size.Arch, oral Biol. 13: 129–131.
Gazin, C. (1968). A new primate from the Torrejon middle Paleocene of the San Juan Basin, New Mexico.Proc. biol. Soc. Wash. 81: 629–634.
Gazin, C. (1971). Paleocene primates from the Shotgun Member of the Fort Union Formation in the Wind River Basin, Wyoming.Proc. biol. Soc. Wash. 84: 13–38.
Gingerich, P. (1975). New North American Plesiadapidae and a biostratigraphic zonation of the Middle and Upper Paleocene.Contr. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich. 24: 135–148.
Gingerich, P. (1976). Cranial anatomy and evolution of early Tertiary Plesiadapidae.Contr. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich. 15: 1–141.
Gingerich, P. (1977). Correlation of tooth size and body size in living hominoid primates, with a note on relative brain size inAegyptopithecus andProconsul.Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 47: 395–398.
Gingerich, P. (1979). Phylogeny of Middle Eocene Adapidae in North America:Smilodectes andNotharctus.J. Paleontol. 53: 153–163.
Gingerich, P. (1980). Dental and cranial adaptations in Eocene Adapidae.Z. Morph. Anthrop. 71: 135–142.
Gingerich, P. (1981). Early Cenozoic Omomyidae and the evolutionary history of tarsiiform primates.J. hum. Evol. 10: 345–374.
Gingerich, P., and Dorr, J. (1979). Mandible ofChiromyoides minor from the Upper Paleocene Chappo Member of the Wasatch Formation, Wyoming.J. Paleontol. 53: 550–552.
Gingerich, P., and Martin, R. (1981). Cranial morphology and adaptations in Eocene Adapidae. II. The Cambridge skull ofAdapts parisiensis.Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 56: 235–237.
Gingerich, P., and Simons, E. (1977). Systematics, phylogeny, and evolution of early Eocene Adapidae in North America.Contr. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich. 24: 245–279.
Gingerich, P., and Smith, B. (1985). Allometric scaling in the dentition of primates and insectivores. In Jungers, W. (ed.),Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, Plenum, New York, pp. 257–272.
Gingerich, P., Smith, B., and Rosenberg, K. (1982). Allometric scaling in the dentition of primates and prediction of body weight from tooth size in fossils.Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 58: 81–100.
Gunnell, G., and Gingerich, P. (1981). A new species ofNiptomomys from the early Eocene of Wyoming.Folia primatol. 36: 128–137.
Gurche, J. (1982). Early primate brain evolution. In Armstrong, E., and Falk, D. (eds.),Primate Brain Evolution, Plenum, New York, pp. 227–246.
Henderson, A., and Corruccini, R. (1976). Relationship between tooth size and body size in American blacks.J. dent. Res. 55: 94–96.
Jerison, H. (1973).The Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence, Academic Press, New York.
Johnson, A. (1978). Tooth size/body size inGorilla gorilla andPongo pygmaeus.J. dent. Res. 57: 608.
Jungers, W. (ed.) (1985).Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, Plenum Press, New York.
Kay, R. (1973).Mastication, Molar Tooth Structure, and Diet in Primates, Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, New Haven, Conn.
Kay, R. (1975). The functional adaptations of primate molar teeth.Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 43: 195–216.
Kay, R. (1977). The evolution of molar occlusion in the Cercopithecidae and early catarrhines.Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 46: 327–352.
Kay, R., and Cartmill, M. (1977). Cranial morphology and adaptations ofPalaechthon nacimienti and other Paromomyidae, with a description of a new genus and species.J. hum. Evol. 6: 19–53.
Kay, R., and Simons, E. (1980). The ecology of Oligocene African Anthropoidea.Int. J. Primatol. 1: 21–37.
Karause, D. (1978). Paleocene primates from western Canada.CAn. J. Earth Sci. 15: 1250–1271.
Orlosky, F. (1973).Comparative Dental Morphology of Extant and Extinct Cebidae, Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.
Peters, R. (1983).The Ecological Implications of Body Size, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rose, K. (1975). The Carpolestidae: Early Tertiary primates from North America.Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. 147: 1–74.
Rose, K., and Bown, T. (1982). New plesiadapiform primates from the Eocene of Wyoming and Montana.J. Vert. Paleontol. 2: 63–69.
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984).Scaling. Why is Animal Size so Important? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Simons, E., and Kay, R. (1983).Qatrania, new basal anthropoid primate from the Fayum, Oligocene of Egypt.Nature (London) 304: 624–626.
Simpson, G. (1955). The Phenacolemuridae, new family of early primates.Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 105: 417–441.
Smith, R. (1981). Interpretation of correlations in intraspecific and interspecific allometry.Growth 45: 291–297.
Smith, R. (1985). The present as a key to the past: Body weight of Miocene hominoids as a test of allometric methods for paleontological inference. In Jungers, W. (ed.),Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 437–448.
Straus, W., and Schön, M. (1960). Cranial capacity ofOreopithecus bambolii.Science 132: 670–672.
Swindler, D. (1976).Dentition of Living Primates, Academic Press, London.
Swindler, D., and Sirianni, J. (1975). Tooth and body size correlations inMacaco nemestrina.J. dent. Res. 54: 695.
Szalay, F. (1968). The beginnings of primates.Evolution 22: 19–36.
Szalay, F. (1971). The European adapid primatesAgerina andPronycticebus.Am. Mus. Novit. 2466: 1–19.
Szalay, F. (1973). New Paleocene primates and a diagnosis of the new suborder Paromomyiformes.Folia primatol. 19: 73–87.
Szalay, F., and Berzi, A. (1973). Cranial anatomy ofOreopithecus.Science 180: 183–185.
Walker, A., and Pickford, M. (1983). New postcranial fossils ofProconsul africanus andProconsul nyanzae. In Ciochon, R., and Corruccini, R. (eds.),New Interpretations of Ape and Human Ancestry, Plenum, New York, pp. 325–352.
Walker, A., Falk, D., Smith, R., and Rickford, M. (1983). The skull ofProconsul africanus: Reconstruction and cranial capacity.Nature (London) 305: 525–527.
Wilson, J., and Szalay, F. (1972). New paromomyid primate from Middle Paleocene beds, Kutz Canyon area, San Juan Basin, New Mexico.Am. Mus. Movit. 2499: 1–18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Conroy, G.C. Problems of body-weight estimation in fossil primates. Int J Primatol 8, 115–137 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02735160
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02735160