Abstract
The field of Third World studies is thought once again to be in a state of crisis, thanks largely to disillusionment with the once-dominant dependency “paradigm.” Amidst renewed interest in developmentalism and the clamor for an alternative to dependency, this article argues, first, that the major achievements of dependency theory remain largely unrecognized because the approach has been so frequently misrepresented or misunderstood. Whatever the ultimate status of dependency’s theoretical claims, it contains elements of a countermodernist attitude which ought to be retained in any new approach to the study of Third World development.
Second, the article argues that, despite these accomplishments, dependency remains trapped, along with developmentalism, within a modernist discourse which relies on the principles of nineteenth century liberal philosophy; that it treats the individual nation-state in the Third World as the sovereign subject of development; and that it accepts the Western model of national autonomy with growth as the appropriate one to emulate. The final section of the article discusses the efforts of a number of scholars to ground knowledge in local histories and experiences rather than building theory through the use of general conceptual categories and Western assumptions. Although these ideas currently remain on the margins of Third World studies, it is to be hoped that dependency’s loss of intellectual hegemony has at least opened up a space for them to be taken seriously, in the same way that dependency was itself taken seriously in the late 1960s.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ALMOND, GABRIEL 1970Political development: Essays in the heuristic theory. Boston: Little Brown.
ALMOND, GABRIEL 1983 Comparative politics and political development: A historical perspective. Joint seminar on political development, Harvard-MIT, October 26.
ALMOND, GABRIEL and SYDNEY VERBA 1963The civic culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
ALMOND, GARBIEL and G. BINGHAM POWELL 1965Comparative politics: A developmental approach. Boston: Little Brown.
— 1978Comparative politics: System, process, and policy. Boston: Little Brown.
APTER, DAVID 1971Choice and the politics of allocation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
ASHLEY, RICHARD K. 1988 Untying the sovereign state: A double reading of the anarchy problematique.Millenium: Journal of International, Studies 17: 227–262.
— 1989 Living on border lines: Man, poststructuralism and war. InInternational/intertextual, relations: Postmodern readings of world politics, edited by James Der Derian and Michael J. Shapiro, 259–321. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
ASSMAN, HUGO 1976Theology for a nomad church. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
BARAN, PAUL 1957The political economy of growth. New York: Monthly Review Press.
BATES, ROBERT (ed.) 1988Toward a political economy of development: A rational choice perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
BEITZ, CHARLES R. 1979Political theory and international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
BERRYMAN, PHILLIP 1987Liberation theology: The essential facts about the revolutionary movement in Latin America and beyond. New York: Pantheon Books.
BLUMENBERG, HANS 1983The legitimacy of the modern age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
BODENHEIMER, SUZANNE J. 1970 The ideology of developmentalism: American political science's paradigm-surrogate for Latin American studies.Berkeley Journal of Sociology 15: 95–137.
BONINO, JOSE M. 1975Doing theology in a revolutionary situation. Philadelphia: Fortress Books.
CARDOSO, FERNANDO H. 1970 ‘Teoria de la dependencia’ o analisis de situaciones concretas de dependencia?Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencia Politica 1 (December): 409–432.
— 1973 Associated-dependent: Theoretical and practical implications. InAuthoritarian Brazil Origins, policies and future, edited by Alfred Stepan, 142–178. New Haven: Yale University Press.
— 1977 The consumption of dependency theory in the United States.Latin American Research Review 12, 3: 7–24.
CARDOSO, FERNANDO H. and ENZO FALETTO 1979Dependency and development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of Calfironia Press.
CARDOSO, FERNANDO H. 1964The twenty years' crisis. New York: Harper and Row.
CHAI, W. and CAL CLARK, eds. 1987Political stability and economic growth: Case studies of Hong Kong, Korea, Singapore and the ROC. Langham, MD: University Press of America.
CHASE-DUNN, CHRISTOPHER and RICHARD RUBINSON 1977 Toward a structural perspective on the world-system.Politics and Society 7, 4: 543–476.
CHILTON, STEPHEN 1988Defining political development. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
CLARK, CAL 1987 The Taiwan exception: Implications for contending political economy paradigms.International Studies Quarterly 31, 3 (September): 327–356.
COMBLIN, JOSE 1973The church and the national security state. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
CONNOLLY, WILLIAM E. 1988Political theory and modernity. New York: Blackwell.
— 1989 Identity and difference in global politics. InInternational/intertextual relations: Postmodern readings of world politics edited by James Der Derian and Michael J. Shapiro, 323–342. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
DER DERIAN, JAMES and MICHAEL J. SHARIRO, eds. 1989International/intertextual relations: Postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
DERRIDA, JACQUES 1976Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
— 1978Writing and difference. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
DEUTSCH, KARL W. 1966Nationalism and social communication: An inquiry into the foundations of nationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DUSSELL, ENRIQUE D. 1979 Historical and philosophical presuppositions for Latin America. InFrontiers of theology in Latin America, edited by Rosino Gibellini, 194–215. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
— 1981A history of the church in Latin America: Colonialism to liberation. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Press.
DUVALL, RAYMOND D. 1978 Dependence and dependencia theory: Notes toward precision of concept and argument.International Organization (Winter): 51–78.
EDWARDS, MICHAEL 1989 The irrelevance of development studies.Third World Quarterly 11, 1 (January): 116–135.
ESCOBAR, ARTURO 1984 Discourse and power in development: Michel Foucault and the relevance of his work to the third world. Alternatives10 (Winter): 377–400.
EVANS, PETER 1979Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
FALS-BORDA, ORLANDO 1988Knowledge and people's power. Delhi: Indian Social Institute.
FOSTER-CARTER, AIDAN 1973 Neo-marxist approaches to development and underdevelopment.Journal of Contemporary Asia 3, 1:7–33.
FOUCAULT, MICHEL 1984 What Enlightenment? InThe Foucault reader, edited by Paul Rabinow, 32–50. New York: Pantheon.
FRANK, ANDRE G. 1967a Sociology of development or underdevelopment of sociology.Catalyst 3 (Summer): 20–73.
— 1967bCapitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical studies of Chile and Brazil. New York: Monthly Review Press.
— 1969Latin America: Underdevelopment or revolution. New York: Monthly Review Press.
— 1972Lumpenbourgeoisie-lumpendevelopment. New York: Monthly Review Press.
FREIRE, PAULO 1975Cultural action for freedom. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
FURTADO, CELSO 1970Economic development of Latin America: A survey from colonial times to the Cuban revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GUTIERREZ, GUSTAVO 1973A theology of liberation: History, politics and salvation. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
HALPERIN-DONGHI, TULIO 1982 ‘Dependency theory’ and Latin American historiography.Latin American Research Review 17, 1: 115–130.
HARRELL, S. 1985 Why do the Chinese work so hard? Reflections on an entrepreneurial ethic.Modern China 11: 203–226.
HARSANYI, JOHN C. 1969 Rational choice models of political behavior vs. functionalist and conformist theories.World Politics 21, 4 (July): 513–538.
HAWTHORNE, GEOFFREY 1987Enlightenment and despair: A history of social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HUNTINGTON, SAMUEL P. 1968Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
HUNTINGTON, SAMUEL P. and JOAN NELSON 1976No easy choice: Political participation in developing countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
INKELES, ALEX 1969 Making men modern: On the causes and consequences of individual change in six developing countries.American Journal of Sociology 75, 2: 208–255.
LALL, SANJAYA 1975 Is ‘dependence’ a useful concept in analysing underdevelopment?World Development 3 (November): 799–810
LERNER, DANIEL 1964The passing of traditional society, 2nd. ed. New York: Free Press.
LEYS, COLIN 1975Underdevelopment in Kenya: The political economy of neo-colonialism. London: Heinemann.
LIPSET, SEYMOUR M. 1960Political man. New York: Doubleday.
MAHLER, VINCENT A. 1980Dependency approaches to international political economy: A cross-national study. New York: Columbia University Press.
MARINI, RUY M. 1972 Brazilian sub-imperialism.Monthly Review 9 (February): 14–24.
MATHUR, G.B. 1989 the current impasse in development thinking: the metaphysic of power.Alternatives 14: 463–479.
MAXWELL, NICHOLAS 1984From knowledge to wisdom. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
MCCLELLAND, DAVID 1962The achieving society. Princeton: Van Nostrand.
MIES, MARIA 1986Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale. London: Zed Books.
MITCHELL, WILLIAM C. 1969 The shape of political theory to come: From political sociology to political economy. InPolitics and the Social Sciences, edited by Seymour M. Lipset, 101–136. New York: Oxford University Press.
MOORE, BARRINGTON JR. 1966Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston: Beacon Press.
MOULDER, FRANCES V. 1977Japan, China, and the modern world-economy: Toward a reinterpretation of East Asian development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
NANDY, ASHIS 1987 Reconstructing childhood: A critique of the ideology of adulthood. In hisTraditions, tyranny and utopias: Essays in the politics of awareness. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
NOVAK, MICHAEL 1986Will it liberate? Questions about liberation theology. New York: Paulist Press.
PACKENHAM, ROBERT A. 1973Liberal America and the third world: Political development ideas in foreign aid and social science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
PALMA, GABRIEL 1978 Dependency: A formal theory of underdevelopment or a methodology for the analysis of concrete situations of underdevelopment?World Development 6: 881–924.
POTTENGER, JOHN R. 1989The political theory of liberation theology. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
PYE, LUCIEN W. 1962Politics, personality and nation-building: Burma's search for identity. New Haven: Yale University Press.
— 1965 The concept of political development.Annals of the American Academy of Politics and Social Science (March): 3–13.
— 1966Aspects of political development. Boston: Little Brown.
— 1990 Political science and the crisis of authoritarianism.American Political Science Review 84, 1 (March): 3–19.
RAHNEMA, MAJID 1990 Participatory action research: The ‘last temptation of saint’ development.Alternatives 15: 199–226.
RICHARD, PABLOet al. 1984The battle of the gods. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
RODNEY, WALTER 1982How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Washington, DC: Howard University Press.
ROTHCHILD, DONALD and ROBERT L. CURRY JR. 1978Scarcity, choice and public policy in middle Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.
RUSSELL, C. and N. NICHOLSON 1981Public choice and rural development. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
SALMEN, LAWRENCE F. 1987Listen to the people: participant-observer evaluation of development projects. New York: The World Bank/Oxford University Press.
SEGUNDO, JUAN L. 1976The liberation of theology. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
— 1981 Capitalism-socialism: A theological crux. InLiberation south, liberation north, edited by Michael Novak, 7–23. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
SHETH, D.L. 1987 Alternative development as political practice.Alternatives 12: 155–171.
SHILS, EDWARD 1965Political development in the new states. The Hague: Mouton.
SHIVA, VANDANA 1989Staying alive: Women, ecology and development. London: Zed Books.
SMITH, TONY 1979 The underdevelopment of development literature: The case of dependency theory.World Politics 31, 2 (January): 247–288.
— 1985 Requiem or new agenda for third world studies?World Politics 37, 4: 532–561.
SOBRINO, JON 1978Christology at the crossroads: A Latin American approach. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
SUNKEL, OSVVALDO 1969 National development policy and external dependence in Latin America.Journal of Development Studies (October): 23–48.
TIPPS, DEAN C. 1973 Modernization theory and the comparative study of societies: A critical perspective.Comparative Studies in Society and History (March): 199–226.
VANDERGEEST, PETER and FREDERICK H. BUTTEL 1988 Marx, Weber and development sociology: Beyond the impasse.World Development 16, 6: 683–695.
VERHELST, THIERRY G. 1990No life without roots: Culture and development. London: Zed Books.
WALLERSTEIN, IMMANUEL 1974The modern world system: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic Press.
WARREN, IILL 1973 Imperialism and capitalist industrialization.New Left Review 81 (September): 3–45.
WEINER, MYRON and SAMUEL P. HUNTINGTON 1987Understanding political development. Glenview, IL: Little Brown.
WENDT, ALEXANDER E. 1987 The agent-structure problem in international relations theory.International Organization 41, 3: 335–370.
WIARDA, HOWARD 1981 The ethnocentrism of the social sciences: Implications for research and policy.The Review of Politics 43, 2 (April): 163–197.
— 1989 Rethinking political development: A look backward over thirty years, and a look ahead.Studies in Comparative International Development 24, 4 (Winter): 65–82.
Additional information
Kate Manzo is assistant professor of political science at Williams College in Williamstown, MA 01267. Her research and writing interests focus on theories of development and on the nature of South African change. She is currently at work on a book entitledAfrikanerdom and Race: The Nature of Ideology in a Changing Society.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manzo, K. Modernist discourse and the crisis of development theory. St Comp Int Dev 26, 3–36 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02717866
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02717866