Abstract
A nonlinear optimization model is developed to transmute a unit hydrograph into a probability distribution function (PDF). The objective function is to minimize the sum of the square of the deviation between predicted and actual direct runoff hydrograph of a watershed. The predicted runoff hydrograph is estimated by using a PDF. In a unit hydrograph, the depth of rainfall excess must be unity and the ordinates must be positive. Incorporation of a PDF ensures that the depth of rainfall excess for the unit hydrograph is unity, and the ordinates are also positive. Unit hydrograph ordinates are in terms of intensity of rainfall excess on a discharge per unit catchment area basis, the unit area thus representing the unit rainfall excess. The proposed method does not have any constraint. The nonlinear optimization formulation is solved using binary-coded genetic algorithms. The number of variables to be estimated by optimization is the same as the number of probability distribution parameters; gamma and log-normal probability distributions are used. The existing nonlinear programming model for obtaining optimal unit hydrograph has also been solved using genetic algorithms, where the constrained nonlinear optimization problem is converted to an unconstrained problem using penalty parameter approach. The results obtained are compared with those obtained by the earlier LP model and are fairly similar.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barnes B S 1959 Consistency in unit hydrographs.Proc. Am. Soc. Civil. Eng. 85 (HY8): 39–63
Bender D L, Roberson J A 1961 The use of dimensionless unit hydrograph to derive unit hydrographs for some Pacific basins.J. Geogr. Res. 66: 521–527
Bruen M, Dooge J C I1984 An efficient and robust method for estimating unit hydrograph ordinates.J. Hydrol. 70: 1–24
Chow V T, Maidment D R, Mays L R 1988Applied hydrology Int. edn (Singapore: McGraw Hill)
Collins W T 1939 Runoff distribution graphs from precipitation occuring in more than one time unit.Civ. Eng. 9: 559–561
Deb K 2001Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary Algorithms (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons)
Deinger R A 1969 Linear program for hydrologic analysis.Water Resources Res. 5: 1105–1109
Goldberg D E 1989Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and in machine learning (Reading, MA: Addison Wiley)
Holland J H 1975Adaptation in natural and artificial systems (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press)
Morel-Seytoux H J 1982 Optimization methods of rainfall-runoff modeling.Rainfall-runoff relationships (ed.) V P Singh (Littleton, CO: Water Resources Pub.) pp 487–506
Mays L W, Coles L 1980 Optimization of unit hydrograph determination.J. Hydraul. Div. 106 (HY1): 85–97
Mays L W, Taur C K 1982 Unit hydrograph via nonlinear programming.Water Resources Res. 18(4): 744–752
Prasad T D, Gupta R, Prakash S 1999 Determination of optimal loss rate parameters and unit hydrograph.J. Hydrol. Eng. Am. Soc. Civil. Eng. 4: 83–87
Singh K P 1976 Unit hydrographs: A comparative study.Water Resources Bull. 12: 381–392
Singh V P 1988Hydrologic systems (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall) vol. 1
Sherman L K 1932 Stream flow from rainfall by the unit graph method.Eng. News Rec. 108: 501–505
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhattacharjya, R.K. Optimal design of unit hydrographs using probability distribution and genetic algorithms. Sadhana 29, 499–508 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703257
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703257