Abstract
This article addresses the problem of determining the optimal “Model Grain” or spatial resolution (scale) for landscape modeling in the Everglades. Selecting an appropriate scale for landscape modeling is a critical task that is necessary before using spatial data for model development. How the landscape is viewed in a simulation model is dependent on the scale (cell size) in which it is created. Given that different processes usually have different rates of fluctuations (frequencies), the question of selection of an appropriate modeling scale is a difficult one and most relevant to developing spatial ecosystem models.
The question of choosing the appropriate scale for modeling is addressed using the landscape indices (e.g., cover fraction, diversity index, fractal dimension, and transition probabilities) recently developed for quantifying overall characteristics of spatial patterns. A vegetation map of an Everglades impoundment area developed from SPOT satellite data was used in the analyses. The data from this original 20 × 20 m data set was spatially aggregated to a 40 × 40 m resolution and incremented by 40 meters on up to 1000 × 1000 m (i.e., 40, 80, 120, 160 … 1000) scale. The primary focus was on the loss of information and the variation of spatial indices as a function of broadening “Model Grain” or scale.
Cover fraction and diversity indices with broadening scale indicate important features, such as tree islands and brush mixture communities in the landscape, nearly disappear at or beyond the 700 m scale. The fractal analyses indicate that the area perimeter relationship changes quite rapidly after about 100 m scale. These results and others reported in the paper should be useful for setting appropriate objectives and expectations for Everglades landscape models built to varying spatial scales.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barnsley, M., 1988. Fractals Everywhere. Academic Press, N.Y.
Bradbury, R.H., R.E. Reichelt, and D.G. Green, 1984. Fractals in Ecology: Methods and Interpretation. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 14: 295–296.
Burrough, P.A. 1981. Fractal Dimensions of Landscapes and Other Environmental Data. Nature, 294: 240–242.
Burrough, P.A., 1983. Multiscale Sources of Spatial Variation in Soil. I. The Application of Fractal Concepts to Nested Levels of Soil Variation. J. of Soil Sci. 34: 577–587.
Burrough, P.A., 1984. The Application of Fractal Ideas of Geophysical Phenomena. Bull. Inst. Math. Appl. 20(3/4): 36–42.
Burrough, P.A., 1986. Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Costanza, R., C.H. Fitz, J.A. Bartholomew, and E. DeBellevue, 1992. The Everglades Landscape Model (ELM): Summary Report of Task 1 Model Feasibility Assessment. Institute for Ecological Economics, Center of Environmental and Estuarine Studies, University of Maryland, Solomons, MD.
Craighead, F.C., Sr. 1971. The Trees of South Florida, Vol I: The Natural Environments and Their Succession, University of Miami Press, Coral Cables, FL.
Cullinan, V.I., and J.M. Thomas, 1992. A Comparison of Methods for Examining Landscape Pattern and Scale. Landscape Ecology, 7(3): 211–227.
Davis, S.M., 1991. Growth, Decomposition and Nutrient Retention ofCladium jamaicense Crantz andTypha domingensis Pers. in the Florida Everglades. Aquat. Bot. 40: 203–224.
Davis, S.M., 1994. Phosphorus Inputs and Vegetation Sensitivity in the Everglades. In: Everglades — The Ecosystem and Its Restoration, ed. by S.M. Davis and John C. Ogden, St Lucie Press, Florida.
Davis, S.M., 1994. Landscape Dimension, Composition, and Function in a Changing Everglades Ecosystem. In: Everglades — The Ecosystem and Its Restoration, ed. by S.M. Davis and John C. Ogden, St Lucie Press, Florida.
Debusk, W.F., K.R. Reddy, M.S. Koch, and Y. Wang, 1994. Spatial Distribution of Soil Nutrients in a Northern Everglades Marsh: Water Conservation Area 2A. Soil Sci. Am. J., vol 58(2).
De Cola, L., 1989. Fractal Analysis of a Classified Landsat Scene. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 55(5): 601–610.
Dineen, J.W., 1972. Life in the Tenacious Everglades. In Depth Report: Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District, 1(5).
Dineen, J.W., 1974. Examination of Water Management Alternatives in Conservation Area 2A. In Depth Report: Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District, 2(3).
Feder, J., 1988 Fractals. Plenum, N.Y.
Fitz, C.H., R. Costanza, and E. Reyes, 1993. The Everglades Landscape Model: Summary Report 2, Model Development. Institute for Ecological Economics, Center of Environmental and Estuarine Studies, University of Maryland, Solomons, MD.
Frontier, S., 1987. Applications of Fractal Theory to Ecology. NATO ASI Series, Vol. G14.
Gardner, R.H., B.T. Milne, M.G. Turner, and R.V. O’Neil, 1987. Neutral Models for the Analysis of Broad Scale Landscape Pattern. Landscape Ecology, 1(1): 19–28.
Gunderson, L.H., J.R. Stenberg, and A.K. Herndon. 1988. Tolerance of Five Hardwood Species to Flooding Regimes in South Florida. In: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Fresh-water Wetlands Research, ed. by D.J. Wilcox, Michigan State University Press, Ann Arbor.
Holling, C.S., 1992. Cross-Scale Morphology, Geometry and Dynamics of Ecosystems. Ecological Monographs, 62(4): 447–502.
Jensen, J.J., K. Rutchey, M.S. Koch, and S. Narumalani, 1995. Inland Wetland Change Detection in the Everglades Water Conservation Area 2A Using a Time Series of Normalized Remotely Sensed Data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 61: 199–209.
King, A.W., 1987. Translating Models Across Scales in the Landscape. In: Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, ed. by M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Krummel, J.R., R.H. Gardner, G. Sugihara, R.V. O’Neill, and P.R. Coleman, 1987. Landscape Patterns in a Disturbed Environment. OIKOS, 48(3): 321–324.
Li, H., and J.F. Reynolds, 1993. A New Contagion Index to Quantify Spatial Patterns of Landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 8(3): 155–162.
Lovejoy, S., 1982. Area-Perimeter Relation for Rain and Cloud Areas. Science, 216(9): 185–187.
Ludwig, J.A., and J.F. Reynolds, 1988. Statistical Ecology, A Premier on Methods and Computing, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Mandelbrot, B.B., 1977. Fractals, Form Chance and Dimension. Freeman Press, San Francisco.
Meettemeyer, V., and E.O. Box, 1987. Scale Effects in Landscape Studies. In Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance, ed. M.G. Turner, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Milne, B.T., 1988. Measuring the Fractal Geometry of Landscapes. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 27: 67–79. Elsevier Science, New York.
Milne, B.T., 1991. Lessons from Applying Fractal Models to Landscape Patterns. In: Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, Ed. by M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Milne, B.T., 1992. Spatial Aggregation and Neutral Models in Fractal Landscapes. The American Naturalist, 139(1): 32–57.
O’Neil, R.V., J.R. Krummel, R.H. Gardner, G. Sugihara, B. Jackson, D.L. DeAngelis, B.T. Milne, M.G. Turner, B. Zygmunt, S. Christensen, V.H. Dale, and R.L. Graham, 1988. Indices of Landscape Pattern. Landscape Ecology., 1: 153–162.
Pastor, J., and M. Broschart, 1990. The Spatial Pattern of a Northern Conifer-Hardwood Landscape. Landscape Ecology, 4(1): 55–68.
Pielou, E.C., 1975. Ecological Diversity. Wiley-Intersciences, New York, NY. 165 pp.
Risser, P.G., J.K. Karr, and R.T.T. Forman, 1984. Landscape Ecology: Directions and Approaches. Spec. Publ. 2. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL, 18 pp.
Rutchey, K., and L. Vilchek, 1994. Development of An Everglades Vegetation Map Using A SPOT Image and the Global Positioning System. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60(6): 767–775.
Shannon, C.E., and W. Weaver, 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
SAS Institute, 1990. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6, SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
Turner, M.G., 1987. Spatial Simulation of Landscape Changes in Georgia: A Comparison of 3 Transition Models. Landscape Ecology, 1(1): 29–36.
Turner, M.G., and C.L. Rusher, 1988. Changes in Landscape Pattern in Georgia, USA. Landscape Ecology, 1(4): 241–251.
Turner, M.G., R.V. O’Neil, R.H. Gardner, and B.T. Milne, 1989a. Effects of Changing Spatial Scale on the Analysis of Landscape Pattern. Landscape Ecology, 3(3/4): 153–163.
Turner, M.G., R. Costanza, and F.H. Sklar, 1989b. Methods to Evaluate the Performance of Spatial Simulation Models. Ecological Modelling, 48:1–18.
Turner, M.G., 1990. Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Landscape Patterns. Landscape Ecology, 4(1): 21–30.
Turner, M.G., and R.H. Gardner, 1991. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology: An Introduction. In: Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, Ed. by M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Urban, D.L., R.V. O’Neil, H.H. Shugart, 1987. Landscape Ecology, a Hierarchical Perspective. BioScience, 37(2): 119–127.
Urban, N.H., S.M. Davis, N.G. Aumen, 1993. Fluctuations in Sawgrass and Cattail Densities in Everglades Water Conservation Area 2A Under Varying Nutrient, Hydrologic and Fire regimens. Aquatic Botany, vol 46.
Worth, D.F., 1988. Environmental Response of WCA-2A to Reduction in Regulation Schedule and Marsh Drawdown (Technical Publication 88-2). West Palm Beach, FL: South Florida Water Management District.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Obeysekera, J., Rutchey, K. Selection of scale for Everglades landscape models. Landscape Ecol 12, 7–18 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02698203
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02698203