Abstract
Fish-habitat relationships on the shallow inner continental shelf were quantified with video sled and metered beam trawl on Fenwick and Weaver shoals offshore of Maryland and Delaware, U.S. These areas provide megascale physical relief and habitat complexity, but for juvenile fishes, mesoscale and microscale habitat is very important particularly as refuge from predation. At these smaller scales, much of the relief on the inner continental shelf is contributed by bedforms or sand waves and biogenic structures such as tubes, shell beds, or pits. A quantitative association for juvenile fishes between and within benthic habitats was found and related primarily to bedform size and amount of biogenic structure. The incidence of fishes was about four-times higher for large bedforms (> 30 cm wavelength and about 10 cm crest height) relative to smaller bedforms (<30 cm wavelength and about 5 cm crest height). For biogenic structure, going from high patch-mat tube densities to lower densities or no biogenic structure increased fish incidence by 5.4 and 3.3 times, respectively. The significant relationships of fishes with bedform size and density of biogenic structure indicated that seemingly small differences in physical structure of a habitat can make the difference between unacceptable and essential habitat for juvenile fishes. Proximity of complex and simple habitats was important in the diel use of habitat and in balancing pressure of refuge from predation provided by complex habitats with foraging for increased resources available in simpler habitats. During the day, spatially complex habitats comprised ofDiopatra andAsabellides tube mats had about twice as many fishes relative to bare sandy habitats (8.3–9.9 versus 4.0–4.1 fishes 100 m−2, respectively). At night, the pattern was reversed with more fishes present in the bare sandy habitats (12.4–13.5 versus 5.6–8.7 fishes 100 m−2). Some fish, such asAmmodytes spp., were very habitat specific and occurred only on dynamic coarser sands near the top of the shoals. Others, such asUrophycis regia, showed less habitat preference and occurred in all habitats during both day and night. Combining the effects of physical relief and biogenics, the habitat with the highest incidence of fishes had large bedforms with some biogenic structure. More emphasis needs to be placed on quantifying the relationship between fishes and their habitats for the fisheries management concept of essential fish habitat to develop into an effective tool on the inner continental shelf. The juvenile life history stages need to be emphasized because fish-habitat interactions are the strongest for these stages and may be the most ecologically important.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Literature Cited
Able, K. W. 1999. Measures of juvenile fish habitat quality: Examples from a National Estuarine Research Reserve, p. 134–147.In L. R. Benaka (ed.). Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Rehabilitation. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
Able, K. W. andM. P. Fahay. 1998. The First Year in the Life of Estuarine Fishes in the Middle Atlantic Bight. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Able, K. W., M. P. Fahay, andG. R. Shepherd. 1995. Early life history of black sea bass,Centropristis striata, in the mid-Atlantic Bight and a New Jersey estuary.Fishery Bulletin 93:429–445.
Agresti, A. 1990. Categorical Data Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Auster, P. J., R. J. Malatesta, andC. L. S. Donaldson. 1997. Distributional responses to small-scale habitat variability by early juvenile silver hake,Merluccius bilinearis.Environmental Biology of Fishes 50:195–200.
Auster, P. J., R. J. Malatesta, S. C. LaRosa, R. A. Copper, andL. L. Stewart. 1991. Microhabitat utilization by the megafaunal assemblage at a low relief outer continental shelf site—Middle Atlantic Bight, USA.Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fish Science 11:59–69.
Bartholomew, A., R. J. Diaz, andG. Cicchetti. 2000. New dimensionless indices of structural habitat complexity: Predicted and actual effects on a predator's foraging success.Marine Ecology Progress Series 206:45–58.
Benaka, L. (ed.). 1999. Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Rehabilitation. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
Beverton, R. J. H. andT. C. Iles. 1992. Mortality rates of 0-group place (Pleuronectes platessa L.), dab (Limanda limanda L.) and turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) in European waters III. Density-dependence of mortality rates of 0-group plaice and some demographic implications.Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 29:61–79.
Beverton, R. J. H., J. G. Cooke, J. B. Csirke, R. W. Doyle, G. Hempel, S. J. Holt, A. D. MacCall, D. J. Policansky, J. Roughgarden, J. G. Shepherd, M. P. Sissenwine, andP. H. Wiebe. 1984. Dynamics of single species, p. 13–59.In R. M. May (ed.), Exploitation of Marine Communities. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Boesch, D. F. 1977. Application of numerical classification in ecological investigations of water pollution. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ecological Research Series EPA-600/3-77-033, Washington, D.C.
Caley, M. J., M. H. Carr, M. A. Hixon, T. P. Hughes, G. P. Jones, andB. A. Menge. 1996. Recruitment and the local dynamics of open marine populations.Annual Review Ecology and Systematics 27:477–500.
Colvocoresses, J. A. andJ. A. Musick. 1984. Species associations and community composition of Middle Atlantic Bight continental shelf demersal fishes.Fishery Bulletin 82:295–313.
Cushing, D. H. 1996. Toward a science of recruitment in fish populations, p. 1–175.In O. Kinne, (ed.), Excellence in Ecology. Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany.
Cutter, Jr.,G. R. andR. J. Diaz. 2000. Environmental survey of potential sand resource sites offshore Delaware and Maryland, Part 1: Benthic habitat mapping and resource evaluation of potential sand mining areas, 1998–1999. OCS Study 2000-055. U.S. Department of Interior, Minerals Management Service, Herndon, Virginia.
Doherty, P. J. 1991. Spatial and temporal patterns in recruitment, p. 89–93.In P. F. Sale (ed.), The Ecology of Fishes on Coral Reefs. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California.
Fogarty, M. J., M. P. Sissenwine, andE. B. Cohen. 1991. Recruitment variability and the dynamics of exploited marine populations.Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6:241–246.
Gabriel, W. L. 1992. Persistence of demersal fish assemblages between Cape Hatteras and Nova Scotia, Northwest Atlantic.Journal Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Science 14:29–46.
Goff, J. A., D. J. P. Swift, C. S. Duncan, L. A. Mayer, andJ. Hughes-Clarke. 1999. High-resolution swath sonar investigation of sand ridge, dune and ribbon morphology in the offshore environment of the New Jersey margin.Marine Geology 161:307–337.
Hewitt, J. E., S. F. Thrush, V. J. Cummings, andS. J. Turner. 1998. The effect of changing sampling scales on our ability to detect effects of large-scale processes on communities.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 227:251–264.
Hoss, D. E. andG. W. Thayer. 1993. The importance of habitat to early life history of estuarine dependent fishes.American Fisheries Society Symposium 14:147–158.
Houde, E. D. 1987. Fish early life dynamics and recruitment variability.American Fisheries Society Symposium 2:17–29.
Huston, M. A. 1999. Local processes and regional patterns: Appropriate scales for understanding variation in the diversity of plants and animals.Oikos 86:393–401.
Kuipers, B. R., B. MacCurrin, J. M. Miller, H. W. van Der Veer, andJ. I. J. Witte. 1992. Small trawls in juvenile flatfish research: Their development and efficiency.Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 29:109–117.
Langton, R. W., P. J. Auster, andD. C. Schneider. 1995. A spatial and temporal perspective on research and management of groundfish in the northwest Atlantic.Reviews in Fisheries Science 3:201–229.
McBride, R. A. andT. F. Moslow. 1991. Origin, evolution and distribution of shoreface sand ridges, Atlantic inner shelf, USA.Marine Geology 97:57–85.
Nizinski, M. S., B. B. Collette, andB. B. Washington. 1990. Separation of two species of sand lances,Ammodytes americanus andA. dubius, in the western North Atlantic.Fishery Bulletin 88:241–255.
Norcross, B. L., F.J. Muter, andB.A. Holladay. 1997. Habitat models for juvenile pleuronectids around Kodiak Island, Alaska.Fishery Bulletin 95:504–520.
Pielou, E. C. 1984. The Interpretation of Ecological Data. A Primer on Classification and Ordination. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Rosenberg, A., T. E. Bigford, S. Leathery, R. L. Hill, andK. Bickers. 2000. Ecosystem approaches to fishery management through essential fish habitat.Bulletin of Marine Science 66:535–542.
Rothschild, B. J. 1986. Dynamics of Marine Fish Populations. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Schneider, D. C. 2001. The rise of the concept of scale in ecology.BioScience 51:545–553.
Sinclair, M. 1988. Marine Populations. An Essay on Population Regulation and Speciation. Washington Sea Grant, University of Washington Press. Seattle, Washington.
Sissenwine, M. P. 1984. Why do fish populations vary?, p. 59–94.In R. M. May (ed.), Exploitation of Marine Communities. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Smith, P. E. 1985. Year-class strength and survival of 0-group clupeids.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 42: 69–82.
Steves, B. P., R. K. Cowen, andM. H. Malchoff. 1998. Settlement and nursery habitats for demersal fishes on the continental shelf of the New York Bight.Fishery Bulletin 98:167–188.
Stokes, M. E., C. S. Davis, andG. G. Koch. 1995. Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
Sullivan, M. C., R. K. Cowen, K. W. Able, andM. P. Fahay. 2000. Spatial scaling of recruitment in four continental shelf fishes.Marine Ecology Progress Series 207:141–154.
Swift, D. J. P., D. B. Duane, andT. F. McKinney. 1973. Ridge and swale topography of the Middle Atlantic Bight, North America: Secular response to the Holocene hydraulic regime.Marine Geology 15:227–247.
Swift, D. J. andM. E. Field. 1981. Evolution of a classic sand ridge field: Maryland sector, North American inner shelf.Sedimentology 28:461–482.
Wright, P. J., H. Jensen, andI. Tuck. 2000. The influence of sediment type on the distribution of the lesser sandeel,Ammodytes marinus.Journal of Sea Research 44:243–256.
Source of Unpublished Materials
Gallagher, E. Personal Communication. Environmental Coastal and Ocean Sciences, University of Massachusetts at Boston, Boston, Massachusetts 02125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Diaz, R.J., Cutter, G.R. & Able, K.W. The importance of physical and biogenic structure to juvenile fishes on the shallow inner continental shelf. Estuaries 26, 12–20 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691689
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691689