Abstract
Second-order conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response (NMR) was investigated when second-order trials (CS1-CS2) were intermixed with first-order trials (CS2-US) from the outset of training. Experiment 1 showed that CR acquisition to CS1 was inversely related to the CS1-CS2 interval but nevertheless extended to an interval of 8,400 ms. Experiment 2 revealed that CR acquisition of CS1 was an inverted-U function of the number of CS1-CS2 trials relative to a fixed number of CS2-US trials. Experiment 3 directly contrasted second-order conditioning with a reinforced serial compound procedure (CS1-CS2-US) and a mixed procedure in which second-order trials were intermixed with the reinforced serial compound. Second-order conditioning was about half the strength of either the reinforced serial compound or the mixed procedure, which were similar. The present results are discussed with respect to the relative strength of excitatory and inhibitory processes in second-order conditioning.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amsel, A. (1958). The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations.Psychological Bulletin, 55, 102–119.
Bellingham, W., Gilette-Billington, K., & Kehoe, E.J. (1985). Summation and configuration in patterning schedules with the rat and rabbit.Animal Learning & Behavior, 13, 152–164.
Coleman, S.R., & Gormezano, I. (1971). Classical conditioning of the rabbit’s (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane response under symmetrical CS-US interval shifts.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 77, 447–455.
Gormezano, I. (1966). Classical conditioning. In J.B. Sidowski (Ed.),Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology (pp. 385–420). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gormezano, I. (1972). Investigations of defense and reward conditioning in the rabbit. In A.H. Black & W.F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory, (pp. 151–181). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Gormezano, I. (1980). Pavlovian mechanisms of goal-directed behavior. In R.E. Thompson, L.H. Hicks, & V.B. Shvyrkov (Eds.),Neural mechanisms of goal-directed behavior and learning (pp. 39–56). New York: Academic Press.
Gormezano, I., & Coleman, S.R. (1975). Effects of partial reinforcement on conditioning, conditional probabilities, asymptotic performance, and extinction of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Sciences, 10, 13–22.
Gormezano, I., & Gibbs, C.M. (1988). Transduction of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 18–21.
Gormezano, I., & Kehoe, E.J. (1984). Associative transfer in classical conditioning to serial compounds. In M.L. Commons, R.J. Herrnstein, & A.R. Wagner (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior, Vol. 3: Acquisition (pp. 297–322). Cambridge: Ballinger.
Gormezano, I., & Kehoe, E.J. (1989). Classical conditioning with serial compound stimuli. In S.B. Sidowski (Ed.),Conditioning, cognition, and methodology: Contemporary issues in experimental psychology (pp. 31–62). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Herendeen, D., & Anderson, D.C. (1968). Second-order conditioning with food unconditioned stimulus: Excitation and inhibition.Psychonomic Science, 13, 15–16.
Green, L., & Schweitzer, L. (1976). Second-order conditioning of the pigeon’s keypeck using an autoshaping procedure. Paper presented at the 17th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society. St. Louis, 1976.
Holland, P.C., & Rescorla, R.A. (1975). The effect of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after first- and second-order appetitive conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 355–363.
Hull, C.L. (1930). Knowledge and purpose as habit mechanisms.Psychological Review, 37, 511–525.
Hull, C.L. (1931). Goal attraction and directing ideas conceived as habit phenomena.Psychological Review, 38, 487–506.
Hull, C.L. (1934). The rat’s speed-of-locomotion gradient in the approach to food.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 17, 393–422.
Kamin, L.J. (1965). Temporal and intensity characteristics of the conditioned stimulus. In W.F. Prokasy (Ed.),Classical conditioning (pp. 118–147). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Kaplan, P.S., & Hearst, E. (1982). Bridging temporal gaps between CS and US in autoshaping: Insertion of other stimuli before, during, and after CS.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 8, 187–203.
Kehoe, E.J. (1988). A layered network model of associative learning: Learning to learn and configuration.Psychological Review, 95, 411–433.
Kehoe, E.J., Cool, V., & Gormezano, I. (In press). Trace conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response as a function of CS-US interval and trials per session.Learning & Motivation.
Kehoe, E.J., Feyer, A.M., & Moses, J.L. (1981). Second-order conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response as a function of the CS2-CS1 and CS1-US intervals.Animal Learning and Behavior, 9, 304–314.
Kehoe, E.J., Gibbs, C.M., Garcia, E., & Gormezano, I. (1979). Associative transfer and stimulus selection in classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response to serial compound CSs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 1–18.
Kehoe, E.J., Marshall-Goodell, B.S., & Gormezano, I. (1987). Differential conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response to serial compound stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 17–30.
Kehoe, E.J., & Morrow, L.D. (1984). Temporal dynamics of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response in serial compound conditioned stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 205–220.
Maisiak, R., & Frey, P.W. (1977). Second-order conditioning: The importance of stimulus overlap on second-order trial.Animal Learning & Behavior, 5, 309–314.
Pavlov, I.P. (1927).Conditioned reflexes. G.V. Anrep, Trans. London: Oxford University Press.
Pearce, J.M., Nicholas, D.J., & Dickinson, A. (1981). The potentiation effect during serial conditioning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33B, 159–179.
Popik, R., Stern, S., & Frey, P. (1979). Second-order conditioning: Different outcomes in fear and eyelid conditioning.Animal Learning & Behavior, 7, 355–359.
Rashotte, M.E., Griffin, R.W., & Sisk, C.L. (1977). Second-order conditioning of the pigeon’s key-peck.Animal Learning and Behavior, 5, 25–38.
Rescorla, R.A. (1969). Pavlovian conditioned inhibition.Psychological Bulletin, 72, 77–94.
Rescorla, R.A. (1982). Effect of a stimulus intervening between CS and US in autoshaping.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 79–95.
Rizley, R.C., & Rescorla, R.A. (1972). Associations in second-order conditioning and sensory preconditioning.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 81, 1–11.
Sears, R., Baker, J., & Frey, P. (1979). The eyeblink as a time-locked response: Implications for serial and second-order conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 43–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gibbs, C.M., Cool, V., Land, T. et al. Second-order conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 26, 282–295 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691064
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691064