Summary
The automation of chromatographic systems is of increasing interest to industry and research laboratories in routine applications. Besides potentially saving time or making better use of available instrumentation, automation also improves the quality of results by producing more precise and more reproducible HPLC data. The need for the validation of methods and qualification of instruments is increasingly recognised in order to ensure compliance with legal requirements (e.g. in the pharmaceutical industry) and to ensure the reliability of analytical results. Possibilities and requirements for automated HPLC systems are elaborated. Emphasis is placed on defining the goals of validation and on discussing different aspects of the validation of LC methods, system suitability tests, ruggedness of methods and the transfer of LC methods from laboratory to laboratory. Adequate strategies of HPLC method development provide very useful information on the validation and ruggedness of LC methods.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
R. Schuster, W. Haecker, Application Note “Automated Precolumn Sample Preparation System”, Hewlett-Packard, Waldbronn, GFR.
J. M. Huen, J. P. Thevenin, Chromatographia12, 6, 405–407 (1979).
R. Vivilecchia, LC/GC Magazine4, 94–106 (1986).
St. E. Cook, Th. C. Pinkerton, J. of Chromatography368, 233–248 (1986).
F. Erni, H. P. Keller, C. Morin, M. Schmitt, J. of Chromatography,204, 65–67 (1981).
Lotus Development Corp., Cambridge, Ma., USA.
RS/1: BBN Research Systems, Cambridge, Ma, USA.
SAS: SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.
Chem Text, Molecular Design, Ltd., San Leandro, Ca., USA.
Experimental Design, Statistical Programmes, Houston TX, USA.
J. Karnicky, T. Schlabach, Sj. Van der Wal, S. Abbott, 8th International Symposium on Column Liquid Chromatography, New York 1984.
L. R. Snyder, J. W. Dolan, DryLab: LC Resources Inc., San Jose, Ca., USA.
Pi Technologies; Orinda, Ca. USA, “The HPLC Doctor”
F. Erni, J. of Chromatography282, 371–383 (1983).
J. M. Davis, J. C. Giddings, Anal. Chem.55, 418–424 (1983).
M. Martin, D. P. Herman, G. Guiochon, Anal. Chem.58, 2200–2207 (1986).
W. Wegscheider, E. P. Lankmayr, M. Otto, Anal. Chimica Acta150, 87–103 (1983).
S. Ebel, Chromatographia22, 7–12, 373–378 (1986).
F. Erni, R. W. Frei, J. of Chromatography149, 561–569 (1978).
K. Jost, Dissertation 1985, Saarbrücken.
A. F. Fell, H. P. Scott, R. Gill, A. C. Moffont, J. of Chromatography273, 3 (1983).
A. C. J. H. Drouen, H. A. H. Billiet, L. De Galaan, Anal. Chem.56, 971 (1984).
F. Erni, J. of Chromatography251, 141–151 (1982).
K. Schellenberg, M. Linder, A. Groeppelin, F. Erni, J. of Chromatography394, 239–251 (1987).
A. P. Goldberg, Anal. Chem.54, 342–345 (1982).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Erni, F., Steuer, W. & Bosshardt, H. Automation and validation of HPLC-systems. Chromatographia 24, 201–207 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02688481
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02688481