Abstract
Cross-national research on taxation is a growth industry in political science. This article discusses key conceptual and measurement issues raised by such studies. First, it highlights the ways in which taxation has been studied as a rich and varied concept, including as a component of the state-building process, as a collective action problem, and/or as a problem of distributive justice. Second, the article identifies the central tradeoffs associated with the construction of taxation indicators used to measure such ideas. It discusses considerations such as which forms of revenue should be included and which should not, whether and how to standardize taxation measures, and how no fine-tune measures through a clear specification of units, universes, and measurement calibration. These choices have important implications for the “scoring” of countries, and for making valid inferences about the relationship between states and societies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adcock, Robert and David Collier. 2001. “Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research.”American Political Science Review 95 (Forthcoming).
Bates, Robert. 1999. “A Political Scientist Looks at Tax Reform.” Pp. 473–491 inTax Reform in Developing Countries, ed. M. Gillis. Durham: Duke University Press.
Berry, William Dale. 1986. “Testing Budgetary Theories with Budgetary Data: Assessing the Risks.”American Journal of Political Science 30: 597–627.
Block, Fred and Gene A. Burns. 1986. “Productivity as a Social Problem: The Uses and Misuses of Social Indicators.”American Sociological Review 51: 767–780.
Bollen, Kenneth. 1993. “Liberal Democracy: Validity and Method Factors in Cross-National Measures.”American Journal of Political Science 37: 1207–1230.
Bollen, Kenneth A. 1980. “Issues in the Comparative Measurement of Political Democracy.”Annual Sociological Review 45: 370–390.
Bollen, Kenneth A, Barbara Entwisle, and Arthur S. Alderson. 1993. “Macrocomparative Research Methods.”Annual Review of Sociology 19: 321–351.
Campbell, John L. 1993. “The State and Fiscal Sociology.”Annual Review of Sociology 19: 163–185.
Carmines, Edward G. and Richard A. Zeller. 1979.Reliability and Validity Assessment. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Chaudhry, Kiren Aziz. 1997.The Price of Wealth: Economies and Institutions in the Middle East. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Cheibub, José Antonio. 1998. “Political Regimes and the Extractive Capacity of Governments: Taxation in Democracies and Dictatorships.”World Politics 50: 349–376.
Cohen Stuart, Arnold Jacob. [1889] 1964. “On Progressive Taxation.” Pp. 48–71 inClassics in the Theory of Public Finance, eds. R. Musgrave and A. Peacock. London: Macmillan & Co., Ltd.
Collier, David and Robert Adcock. 1999. “Democracy and Dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts.”Annual Review of Political Science 2: 537–565.
Collier, Ruth Berins. 1999.Paths Towards Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dorrington, J. C. 1979. “Kakwani's Measure of Tax Progressivity: A Comment.”The Economic Journal 89: 652.
Fauvelle-Aymar, Christine. 1999. “The Political and Tax Capacity of Goverment in Developing Countries.”Kyklos 52: 391–413.
Firebaugh, Glenn and Jack P. Gibbs. 1985. “User's Guide to Ratio Variables.”American Sociological Review 50(5): 713–722.
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998.Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Goldscheid, Rudolf. [1925] 1964. “A Sociological Approach to Problems of Public Finance.” Pp. 202–213 inClassics in the Theory of Public Finance, eds. R. Musgrave and A. Peacock. London: Macmillan & Co., Ltd.
Hyman, David N.. 1992.Public Finance: A Contemporary Application of Theory to Policy. Chicago: The Dryden Press.
International Monetary Fund. 1996.Government Finance Statistics Yearbook. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Janoski, Thomas and Alexander M. Hicks. 1994.The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, Charles O. 1974. “Doing Before Knowing: Concept Development in Political Research.”American Journal of Political Science 18: 215–228.
Kirk, Jerome and Marc L. Miller. 1986.Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Kritzer, Herbert M. 1990. “Substance and Method in the Use of Ratio Variables, or the Spurious Nature of Spurious Correlations?”Journal of Politics 52(1): 243–254.
Levi, Margaret. 1988.Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
MacPhail, Fiona. 1998. “Moving Beyond Statistical Validity in Economics.”Social Indicators Research 45: 119–149.
Peters, B. Guy. 1991.The Politics of Taxation: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Ragin, Charles. 2000.Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.”American Political Science Review 64: 1033–1053.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. [1918] 1954. “The Crisis of the Tax State.” InInternational Economic Papers, No. 4, eds. A. Peacock et al. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd.
Shah, Anwar and John Whalley 1991. “The Redistributive Impact of Taxation in Developing Countries.” Pp. 166–187 inTax Policy in Developing Countries, eds. J. Khalilzadeh-Shirazi and A. Shah. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Steinmo, Sven. 1993.Taxation and Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Steinmo, Sven and Caroline J. Tolbert. 1998. “Do Institutions Really Matter? Taxation in Industrialized Democracies.”Comparative Political Studies 31: 165–187.
Tilly, Charles, ed. 1975.The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
— 1992.Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1992. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Varsano, Ricardo, José Roberto Rodrigues Afonso, Erika Amorim, Araujo, Elisa de Paula Pessoa, Julio Cesar Maciel Ramundo, and Napoleão Luiz Costa da Silva. 1998. “Uma Análise da Carga Tributária do Brasil.” Rio de Janeiro: IPEA.
Von Stein, Lorenz. [1885] 1964. “On Taxation.” Pp. 28–36 inClassics in the Theory of Public Finance, eds. R. Musgrave and A. Peacock. London: Macmillan & Co., Ltd.
Von Wieser, Friederich. [1924] 1964. “The Theory of Public Economy.” Pp. 190–201 inClassics in the Theory of Public Finance, eds. R. Musgrave and A. Peacock. London: Macmillan & Co., Ltd.
Webber, Carolyn and Aaron B. Wildavsky. 1986.A History of Taxation and Expenditure in the Western World. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Weyland, Kurt. 1996.Democracy without Equity: Failures of Reform in Brazil. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
—. 1998. “From Leviathan to Gulliver? The Decline of the Developmental State in Brazil.”Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 11: 51–75.
World Bank. 1988.World Development Report: Issues in Public Finance. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.
World Bank. 1998.World Development Indicators (CD-ROM).
Additional information
Evan S. Lieberman is a Robert Wood Johnson Scholar at Yale University and will begin and appointment as assistant professor in the Department of Politics at Princeton University in September 2002. His interests include comparative politics, research methods, and economic and social policy.
I would like to thank Christopher Achen, David Collier, Marc Morjé Howard, Lucan Way, members of the Robert Wood Johnson Policy Scholars Seminar at Yale University, three anonymous reviewers, and the editors atStudies in Comparative International Development for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lieberman, E.S. Taxation data as indicators of state-society relations: Possibilities and pitfalls in cross-national research. St Comp Int Dev 36, 89–115 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686334
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686334