Abstract
As with other areas of comparative political inquiry, analyses of political corruption must carefully negotiate around numerous methodological issues. In this article, we focus primarily on problems of operationalization and measurement of corruption. We evaluate the major examples of cross-country measures of corruption that have recently emerged and review research that has incorporated the new measures. We end with a discussion of an alternative method for the cross-national measurement and analysis of corruption, one that might also facilitate the goal of establishing universal principles and causal claims about political corruption.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ades, Alberto and Rafael Di Tella. 1997a. “National Champions and Corruption: Some Unpleasant Interventionist Arithmetic.”The Economic Journal 107 (July): 1023–42.
—. 1997b. “The New Economics of Corruption: A Survey and Some New Results.”Political Studies 45 (Annual): 496–515.
Alesina, Alberto and Beatrice Weder. 1999. “Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid?” NBER Working Paper 7108 (May).
Amenta, Edwin and Jane D. Poulsen. 1996. “The Institutional Politics, Theory and Social Spending at the End of the New Deal.” Social Forces 75 (September): 33–61.
Bakker, Heleen E. and Nico G. Schulte Nordholt., 1996.Corruption and Legitimacy. Amsterdam: SISWO Publication 393.
Bayley, David H. 1970. “The Effects of Corruption in a Developing Nation.” Pp. 521–33 inPolitical Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis, ed. Arnold J. Heidenheimer. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Brooks, Robert C. 1970. “The Nature of Political Corruption.” Pp. 56–61 inPolitical Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis, ed. Arnold J. Heidenheimer. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Brown, Cliff and Terry Boswell. 1995. “Strikebreaking or Solidarity in the Great Steel Strike of 1919: A Split Labor Market, Gama-Theoretic, and QCA Analysis.”American Journal of Sociology 100 (May): 1479–1519.
Braguinsky, Serguey. 1996. “Corruption and Schumpeterian, Growth in Different Economic Environments.”Contemporary Economic Policy 14 (July): 14–25.
Brunetti, Aymo, Gregory Kisunko and Beatrice Weder. 1997. “Credibility of Rules and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Worldwide Survey of the Private Sector.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1760.
—. 1997. “Institutional Obstacles for Doing Business: Data Description and Methodology of a Worldwide Private Sector Survey.” Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Collier, David and James E. Mahon. 1993. “Conceptual ‘Stretching’ Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.”American Political Science Review 87 (December): 845–55.
Coverdill, James, William Finlay, and Jack K. Martin. 1995. “Labor Management in the Southern Textile Industry: Comparing Qualitative, Quantitative, and Qualitative Comparative Analyses.”Sociological Methods and Research 23 (August): 54–85.
Coverdill, James E. and William Finlay. 1995. “Understanding Mills via Mill-Type Methods: An Application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis to a Study of Labor Management in Southern Textile Manufacturing.”Qualitative Sociology 18 (4): 457–478.
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” Pp. 79–138 inHandbook of Political Science 7, eds. Fred Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Ekeh, Peter P. 1975. “Colonialism and the Two Publics in Africa: A Theoretical Statement.”Comparative Studies in Society and History 17, 1 (January): 91–112.
Geddes, Barbara and Artur Ribeiro Neto. 1992. “Institutional Sources of Corruption in Brazil.”Third World Quarterly 13 (August): 641–61.
Hannan, Michael T. and Alice A. Young. 1977. “Estimation in Panel Models: Results on Pooling Cross-Sections and Time Series.” Pp. 52–83 inSociological Methodology. ed. David R. Heise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Hicks, Alexander. 1999.Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
—. 1994. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Analytical Induction: The Case of the Emergence of the Social Security State.”Sociological Methods and Research 23 (August): 86–113.
Hollingsworth, Rogers, Robert Hanneman, Jerald Hage, and Charles Ragin. 1996. “The Effect of Human Capital and State Intervention on the Performance of Medical System.”Social Forces 75 (December): 459–484.
IMD. 1997.The World Competitiveness Yearbook. Lausanne, Switzerland: International Institute for Management Development.
Jackman, Robert. 1985. “Cross-National Statistical Research and the Study of Comparative Politics.”American Journal of Political Science 29 (February): 161–82.
Kangas, Olli. 1994. “The Politics of Social Security: On Regressions, Qualitative Comparisons, and Cluster Analysis.” Pp. 346–364 inThe Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State, eds. Thomas Janoski and Alexander Hicks. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Katzelson, Ira. 1997. “Structure and Configuration in Comparative Politics.” Pp. 81–112 inComparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, ed. Mark Irving Lichbach and Alan S. Zuckerman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
King, Gary, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994.Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lambsdorff, Johann Graf. 1998. “An Empirical Investigation of Bribery in International Trade,”European Journal of Development Research 10 (1): 40–59.
Lambsdorf, Johann Graf. 2000. “Measuring Corruption—The Validity and Precision of Subjective Indicators.” Unpublished manuscript.
Lancaster, Thomas D. and Gabriella R. Montinola. 1997. “Toward a Methodology for the Comparative Study of Political Corruption.”Crime, Law and Social Change 27 (N3–4): 185–206.
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer and Robert Vishny. 1999. “The Quality of Government.”Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 (March): 222–79.
Leff, Nathaniel H. 1964. “Economic Development through Bureaucratic Corruption.”American Behavioral Scientist 8 (October): 291–303.
Lieberson, Stanley. 1991. “Small N's and Big Conclusions.”Social Forces (December): 105–18.
Lien, Donald H. D. 1964. “A Note on Competitive Bribery Games.”Economic Letters 22: 337–41.
Lijphart, Arendt. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method”.American Political Science Review 65 (September): 682–93.
—. 1975. “The Comparable Cases Strategy in Comparative Research.”Comparative Political Studies 8 (2): 158–77.
Liu, Francis T. 1985. “An Equilibrium Queuing Model of Bribery.”Journal of Political Economy 93 (August): 760–81.
Mackie, James. 1992. “Changing Patterns of Chinese Big Business in Southeast Asia.” Pp. 161–90. inSoutheast Asian Capitalists, ed. Ruth McVey. Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program.
—. 1976.The Chinese in Indonesia. Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawaii.
Manion, Melanie. 1996. “Corruption by Design.”Journal of Law Economics and Organization 12 (April): 167–95.
Manzetti, Luigi and Charles H. Blake. 1996. “Market Reforms and Corruption in Latin America.”Review of International Political Economy 3 (4): 662–97.
Mauro, Paulo. 1995. “Corruption and Growth.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (August): 681–712.
—. 1998. “Corruption and the Composition of Government Expenditure.”Journal of Public Economics 69 (August): 263–79.
Montinola, Gabriella and Robert Jackman. Forthcoming. “Sources of Corruption: A Cross-Country Study.”British Journal of Political Science.
Peters, Guy. 1998.Comparative Politics: Theory and Methods. New York: New York University.
Philp, Mark. 1994. “On Politics and its Corruption.”Political Theory Newsletter 6 (1): 1–18.
Political Risk Services. 2000.International Country Risk Guide (Codebook). East Syracuse, NY: The PRS Group.
Ragin, Charles C. 1987.The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
— 1994. “A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Pension Systems.” Pp. 320–45 inThe Comparative Economy of the Welfare State, eds. Thomas Janoski and Alexander Hicks. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rauch, James E. and Peter B. Evans. 1997. “Bureaucratic Structure and Bureaucratic Performance in Less Developed Countries.” Unpublished manuscript. University of California, San Diego and Berkeley (July).
Riggs, Fred. 1966.Thailand: The Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity. East-West Center Press. Honolulu.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999.Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sandholtz, Wayne and Wm. Koetzle. 2000. “Accounting for Corruption: Economic Structure, Democracy, and Trade.”International Studies Quarterly 44: (March): 31–50.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.”American Political Science Review 64 (December): 1033–53.
Schwarz, Adam. 1994.A Nation in Waiting: Indonesia in the 1990s. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Tanzi, Vito and Hamid Davoodi. 1997. “Corruption, Public Investment, and Growth,” IMF Working Paper WP/97/139.
Taras, Ray. 1993. “Conclusion: Making Sense of Matrioshka Nationalism.” Pp. 513–538 inNation and Politics in the Soviet Successor States, eds. Ian Bremmer and Ray Taras. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, Charles. 1984.Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Tilman, Robert O. 1970. “Black-Market Bureaucracy.” Pp. 62–66 inPolitical Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis, ed. Arnold J. Heidenheimer. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Wei, Shang-Jin, 1997. “How Taxing is Corruption on International Investors?” NBER Working Paper 6030 (May).
Wickham-Crowley, Timothy. 1992.Guerrillas and Revolutions, in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
—. 1991.Exploring Revolution: Essays on Latin American Insurgency and Revolution Theory. Armonk: New York: M.E. Sharpe.
World Bank.1997 World Development Indicators (CD-ROM version).
Yin, Robert K. 1984.Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Additional information
Thomas D. Lancaster is associate professor of political science at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia. His research and teaching interests include comparative politics, with a specialization in western and southern European politics, and the logic of comparative political inquiry.
Gabriella R. Montinola is assistant professor of political science at the University of California, Davis. Her current research focuses on economic development, interest representation, and the causes and consequences of political corruption. She is the author or co-author of articles in various journals, includingWorld Politics, Journal of Democracy, andBritish Journal of Political Science.
The authors would like to thank Richard Doner, Robert Jackman, and the editor and referees ofSCID for their helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lancaster, T.D., Montinola, G.R. Comparative political corruption: Issues of operationalization and measurement. St Comp Int Dev 36, 3–28 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686202
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686202