Conclusion
It is recognised that data from self-reporting and interviews alone cannot be regarded as conclusive, and that the findings have to be treated with some degree of caution. Nevertheless, it appears that the experiences of pre-service teachers led to an increased desire to instruct children in hands-on science. The findings from the science center support the conclusions of Diamond et al (1987) who suggested that relatively short-term programs at science centers, may be successful in stimulating self-confidence, communication abilities and interest in science. The self-reports and the interview data also suggest that it is likely that these gains will transfer to the classroom.
It is vital that teacher educators continually make use of new strategies that help trainee teachers to become more competent and enthusiastic teachers of science. This innovation is one example that had significant outcomes for the pre-service teachers involved, and follow-up studies planned for 1994 should indicate if the outcomes were sustained.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Australian Education Council. (1989).The Hobart declaration on schooling: Common an agreed national goals for schooling in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
Australian Foundation for Science. (1991). First Steps in Science and Technology: Summary of the Science Education Focus Group discussions held at the Australian Academy of Science, 28–29 May,Focus on Science and Technology Education No. 1. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
Australian Academy of Science. (1992). Primary school project announced.Australian academy of science news-letters. 17(1),. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
Beardslee, D. C., & O’Dowd, D. D. (1961). The college student image of scientists.Science, 5(133), 997–1004.
Brush, L. R. (1979). Avoiding of science and stereotypes of scientists.Journal of Research into Science Teaching, 16(3), 237–241.
Chamberlain, A. (1987). At the exploratorium: Teaching art and science.Educational Perspectives, 24(2), 11–16.
Chambers, C. W. (1983). Stereotype images of scientists: The draw a scientists test.Science Education, 67(2), 255–265.
Chenoweth, K. (1989). A museum is something you do: Science museums help teachers bring hands on approach to class.American Educator, 13(3), 24–29.
Curriculum Corporation. (1992). The science curriculum and teaching program.STCP News, No. 1 June, 1992, Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
Danilov, V. J. (1986). Discovery rooms and kidspaces: Museum Exhibits for children.Science and Children, January 1986, 6–12.
Diamond, J. et al. (1987). The exploratorium’s explainer program: The long term impacts on teenagers of teaching science to the public.Science Education, 71(5), 643–656.
Finson, D. F., & Enochs, L. G. (1987). Student attitudes toward science-technology resulting from visitation to a science technology museum.Journal of Research into Science Teaching, 24(7), 593–609.
Gennaro, D., & Hereid, D. (1986). A study of the latent effects of family learning courses in science.Journal of Research into Science Teaching, 23(9), 771–781.
Oppenheimer, F. (1972). The exploratorium: A playful museum combines perception and art in science education.American Journal of Physics, 40(July 1972), 979–982.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Ferry, B. Science centers and outdoor education centers provide valuable experience for pre-service teachers. J Sci Teacher Educ 4, 85–88 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614555
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614555