Summary
A simple differential equation model was developed to describe the competitive interaction that may occur between species through reproductive interference. The model has the form comparable to Volterra's competition equations, and the graphical analysis of the outcome of the two-species interaction based on its zero-growth isoclines proved that: (1) The possible outcome in this model, as in usual models of resource competition, is either stable coexistence of both species or gradual exclusion of one species by the other, depending critically upon the values of the activity overlapping coefficientc ij ; (2) but, for the samec ij -values, competitive exclusion is much more ready to occur here than in resource competition; (3) and moreover, the final result of the competition is always dependent on the initial-condition due to its non-linear isoclines, i.e., even under the parameter condition that generally allows both species to coexist, an extreme bias in intial density to one species can readily cause subsequent complete exclusion of its counterparts. Thus, it may follow that the reproductive interference is likely to be working in nature as an efficient mechanism to bring about habitat partitioning in either time or space between some closely related species in insect communities, even though they inhabit heterogeneous habitats where resource competition rarely occurs so that they could otherwise attain steady coexistence.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atkinson, W. D. and B. Shorrocks (1981) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: a simulation model.J. Anim. Ecol. 50: 461–471.
Fukuda, H., E. Hama, T. Kuzuya, A. Takahashi, M. Takahashi, B. Tanaka, H. Tanaka, M. Wakabayashi and Y. Watanabe (1982)The Life Histories of Butterflies in Japan. Vol. I. Hoikusha, Osaka. (In Japanese)
Fukuda, H., E. Hama, T. Kuzuya, A. Takahashi, M. Takahashi, B. Tanaka, H. Tanaka, M. Wakabayashi and Y. Watanabe (1983)The Life Histories of Butterflies in Japan. Vol. III. Hoikusha, Osaka. (In Japanese)
Hairston, N. G., F. E. Smith and L. B. Slobodkin (1960) Community structure, population control and competition.Amer. Nat. 94: 421–425.
Hardin, G. (1960) The competitive exclusion principle.Science 131: 1292–1298.
Kennedy, C. E. J. and T. R. E. Southwood (1984) The number of species of insects associated with British trees: a reanalysis.J. Anim. Ecol. 53: 455–478.
Kuno, E. (1988) Aggregation pattern of individuals and the outcomes of competition within and between species: differential equation models.Res. Popul. Ecol. 30: 69–82.
Kuno, E. (1991) Some strange properties of the logistic equation defined withr andK: inherent defects or artifacts?Res. Popul. Ecol. 33: 33–39.
Ribeiro, J. M. C. and A. Spielman (1986) The Satyr effect: a model predicting parapatry and species extinction.Amer. Nat. 128: 513–528.
Strong, D. R., J. H. Lawton and T. R. E. Southwood (1984)Insects on Plants-Community Patterns and Mechanisms. Blackwell, London.
Tamaki, Y. (1977) Complexity, diversity and specificity of behavior-modifying chemicals in Lepidoptera and Diptera. 253–285. In H. H. Shorey and J. J. McKelvey Jr. (eds)Chemical Control of Insect Behavior: Theory and Applications. Wiley, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuno, E. Competitive exclusion through reproductive interference. Res Popul Ecol 34, 275–284 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02514797
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02514797