Abstract
A critical evaluation of different comparator methods is given. The method based on experimentally-determined and convertible comparison factors (k) is considered to be the most suitable for general use. An alternative method is proposed, introducing generalized k0 factors which are independent of irradiation and measuring conditions. This approach combines the simplicity of the absolute methods with nearly the same accuracy attained by the relative ones. It is suggested that k0 factors be compiled in all cases when using single-comparator methods, to allow a continuous re-evaluation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
M. DE BRUIN, P. J. M. KORTHOVEN, Anal. Chem. 44 (1972) 2382.
D. M. LINEKIN, Intern. J. Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 24 (1973) 343.
A. ALIAN, H. J. BORN, J. I. KIM, Intern. Conf. Modern Trends in Activation Analysis. Saclay, 2–6 October, 1972. J. Radioanal. Chem., 15 (1973) 535.
F. GIRARDI, G. GUZZI, J. PAULY, Anal. Chem., 37 (1965) 1085.
R. VAN DER LINDEN, F. DE CORTE, J. HOSTE, IAEA Symp. Application of Nuclear Data in Science and Technology, Paris, 12–16 March, 1973.
J. I. KIM, H. J. BORN, J. Radioanal. Chem., 13 (1973) 427.
F. DE CORTE, A. SPEECKE, J. HOSTE, J. Radioanal. Chem., 3 (1969) 205.
C. H. WESTCOTT, W. H. WALKER, T. K. ALEXANDER, Proc. Intern. Conf. Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, 16 (1958) 70.
O. T. HØGDAHL, Proc. Symp. Radiochemical Methods of Analysis, Salzburg, October 19–23, 1964, IAEA, Vienna 1965, p. 23.
R. W. STOUGHTON, J. HALPERIN, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 15 (1963) 314.
H. GOLDSTEIN, J. A. HARVEY, J. S. STORY, C. H. WESTCOTT, EANDC-12, October 1961.
W. MAENHAUT, F. ADAMS, J. HOSTE, J. Radioanal. Chem., 9 (1971) 325.
I. M. H. PAGDEN, G. J. PEARSON, V. N. BECK, IEEE Trans. NS-17 (1970) 211.
M. L. VERHEIJKE, J. C. VERPLANKE, Intern. Conf. Modern Trends in Activation Analysis, Saclay 2–6 October, 1972, J. Radioanal. Chem., 15 (1973) 509.
J. A. KEENAN, G. B. LARRABEE, Chem. Instr., 3 (1971) 125.
V. KRIVAN, Symp. Application of Nuclear Data in Science and Technology, Paris, 12–16 March, 1973.
R. W. STOUGHTON, J. HALPERIN, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 6 (1959) 100.
C. H. WESTCOTT, Rep. CRRP-960, 1 Sept. 1960.
R. L. HEATH, Scintillation Spectrometry Gamma-Ray Spectrum Catalogue, IDO-16880-1, 1964.
J. M. FREEMAN, J. G. JENKIN, Nucl. Instr. Methods, 43 (1966) 269.
R. J. GEHRKE, J. E. CLINE, R. L. HEATH, Nucl. Instr. Methods, 91 (1971) 349.
A. SIMONITS, F. DE CORTE, J. HOSTE, to be published.
N. E. HOLDEN, F. W. WALKER, Chart of Nuclides, 11th ed., 1972.
R. H. FILBY, A. I. DAVIS, G. G. WAINSCOTT, W. A. HALLER, W. A. CASSAT, Gamma-Ray Energy Tables for Neutron Activation Analysis, Washington State University, 1970.
F. DE CORTE, A. SPEECKE, J. HOSTE, J. Radioanal. Chem., 9 (1971) 9.
M. HEURTEBISE, F. MONTOLOY, J. A. LUBKOWITZ, Anal. Chem., 45 (1973) 47.
R. VAN DER LINDEN, unpublished data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simonits, A., De Corte, F. & Hoste, J. Single-comparator methods in reactor neutron activation analysis. J. Radioanal. Chem. 24, 31–46 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02514380
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02514380