Summary
Of the biotic factors potentially affecting the foraging behavior of pit-building antlion larvae,Myrmeleon bore Tjeder, we focussed on the density effects and examined experimentally influences of larval density on pit construction behavior, spatial distribution and pit relocation rate. Moreover the mechanism of mutual interference among larvae was examined.
-
1.
After releasing 2, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 third instar larvae ofM. bore at the center of each container (30×30×10 cm3) filled with sand, we measured number of pits, pit diameter and position of pit base.
-
2.
More than 80% of antlion larvae at each density always constructed pits, and the rates of larvae that had not constructed pits rose in proportion to the density. Pit size was approximately constant independent of the density.
-
3.
The density ofM. bore larvae clearly affected the residence time of the pits, i.e. more larvae frequently relocate pits with increasing larval density.
-
4.
To analyze the spatial distribution pattern of the larvae in a container, nearest neighbor distance (NND) was measured. Comparison between the observed NND and the expected value for NND in random distribution obtained from computer simulation suggested that high larval density produced a uniform distribution owing to their mutual interference.
-
5.
The result of an experiment to examine the mechanism of mutual interference among larvae showed that frequent dropping of sand into a pit tossed by neighbor antlion larvae causes a pit-relocation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Clark, P.J. andF.C. Evans (1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations.Ecology 35: 445–453.
Formanowicz, Jr, D.R. (1982) Foraging tactics of larvae ofDytiscus verticalis (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae): the assessment of prey density.J. Anim. Ecol. 51: 757–767.
Heinrich, B. andM.J.E. Heinrich (1984) The pit-trapping foraging strategy of the antlion,Myrmeleon immaculatus DeGeer (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14: 151–160.
Inoue, T. andT. Matsura (1983) Foraging strategy of a mantid,Paratenodera angustipennis S.: mechanisms of switching tactics between ambush and active search.Oecologia 56: 264–271.
Matsura, T. (1986) The feeding ecology of the pit-making antlion larvae,Myrmeleon bore: feeding rate and species composition of prey in a habitat.Ecol. Res. 1: 15–24.
Matsura, T. (1987) An experimental study on the foraging behavior of a pit-building antlion larva,Myrmeleon bore.Res. Popul. Ecol. 29: 17–26.
Matsura, T. (1987) Nomenclature of the Japanese pit-building antlions (Neuroptera, Myrmeleontidae).Kontyû 55: 543–548. (In Japanese with English summary)
McClure, M.S. (1976) Spatial distribution of pit-making ant lion larvae (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae): density effects.Biotropica 8: 179–183.
Olive, C.W. (1982) Behavioral response of a sit-and-wait predator to spatial variation in foraging gain.Ecology 63: 912–920.
Simberloff, D., L. King, P. Dillon, S. Lowrie, D. Lorence andE. Schilling (1978) Holes in the doughnut theory: the dispersion of ant-lions.Brenesia 14–15: 13–46.
Simberloff, D. (1979) Nearest neighbor assessments of spatial configurations of circles rather than points.Ecology 60: 679–685.
Wilson, D.S. (1974) Prey capture and competition in the ant lion.Biotropica 6: 187–193.
Youthed, G.J. andV.C. Moran (1969) Pit construction by Myrmeleontid larvae.J. Insect Physiol. 15: 867–875.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matsura, T., Takano, H. Pit-relocation of antlion larvae in relation to their density. Res Popul Ecol 31, 225–234 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02513203
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02513203