Abstract
Vertebral osteoporosis accounts for over 500,000 spinal fractures annually, the majority of which occur in older women. Despite these statistics, data regarding the rate of spinal bone loss in this population are conflicting. Moreover, the site of skeletal evaluation may significantly alter classification of osteoporosis in this age group. To examine trabecular-rich spinal bone loss with a measurement less affected by age-related artifacts that the AP spine, we measured lateral lumbar spine bone density (BMD) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 120 healthy, ambulatory, community-dwelling women 65 years of age and older (mean 70±5 years, range 65–88). We also examined cortical-rich sites in the forearm and total body along with AP spine and femoral BMD to assess the impact of site specificity using the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of osteoporosis. Significant losses in BMD were observed at the lateral spine (−1.1%/year,P<0.01), forearm (−0.77%/year,P≤0.01), total hip (−0.75%/year,P≤0.01), femoral neck (−0.70%/year,P≤0.05), and trochanter (−0.78%/year,P≤0.01), but not the AP spine. Using the WHO criteria, lateral spine BMD determinations classified 66% of women with osteoporosis in contrast to 29% using the AP projection. Osteoporosis was diagnosed in 55% of women using measurements of the femoral neck, 43% using the total radius, and 19% using the total body. We conclude that elderly women lose bone at trabecular-and cortical-rich sites (lateral spine and total radius, respectively) in addition to sustaining significant age-related bone loss at mixed cortical/trabecular sites such as the hip. Classification of osteoporosis in this age group more than doubles using lateral versus AP spinal projections, supporting the necessity of developing more uniform agreement on site-specific analyses.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Riggs BL, Melton LJ III (1986) Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 314:1676–1686
Resnick NM, Greenspan SL (1989) “Senile” osteoporosis reconsidered. JAMA 261:1025–1029
Steiger P, Cummings SR, Black DM, Spencer NE, Genant HK (1992) Age-related decrements in bone mineral density in women over 65. J Bone Miner Res 7:625–632
Hannan MT, Felson DT, Anderson JJ (1992) Bone mineral density in elderly men and women: results from the Framingham osteoporosis study. J Bone Miner Res 7:546–563
Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Melton LJ III, Richelson LS, Judd HL, Offord KP (1986) Rates of bone loss in the appendicular and axial skeletons of women. Evidence of substantial vertebral bone loss before menopause. J Clin Invest 77:1487–1491
Greenspan SL, Maitland LA, Myers ER, Krasnow MB, Kido TH (1994) Femoral bone loss progresses with age: a longitudinal study in women over age 65. J Bone Miner Res 9:1959–1965
Rizzoli R, Slosman D, Bonjour J-Ph (1995) The role of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of lumbar spine and proximal femur in the diagnosis and follow-up of osteoporosis. Am J Med 98(suppl 2A):33S-36S
Dawson-Hughes B, Dallal GE (1990) Effect of radiographic abnormalities on rate of bone loss from the spine. Calcif Tissue Int 46:280–281
Orwoll ES, Oviatt SK, Mann T (1990) The impact of osteophytic and vascular calcifications on vertebral mineral density measurements in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:1202–1207
Drinka PJ, DeSmet AA, Bauwens SF, Rogot A (1992) The effect of overlying calcification on lumbar bone densitometry. Calcif Tissue Int 50:507–510
Uebelhart D, Duboeuf F, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD (1990) Lateral dual-photon absorptiometry: a new technique to measure the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 5:525–531
Finkelstein JS, Cleary RL, Butler JP, Antonelli R, Mitlak BH, Deraska DJ, Zamora-Quezada JC, Neer RM (1994) A comparison of lateral versus anterior-posterior spine dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for the diagnosis of osteopenia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:724–730
Guglielmi G, Grimston SK, Fischer KC, Pacifici R (1994) Osteoporosis: diagnosis with lateral and posteroanterior dual x-ray absorptiometry compared with quantitative CT. Radiology 192:845–850
Kanis JA, Melton LJ III, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137
Feyerabend AJ, Lear JL (1993) Regional variations in bone mineral density as assessed with dual-energy photon absorptiometry and dual x-ray absorptiometry Radiology 186:467–469
Mazess RB, Barden HS, Ettinger M, (1988) Radial and spinal bone mineral density in a patient population. Arthritis Rheum 31:891–897
Wuster C, Duckeck G, Uguel A, Lojen M, Minne HW, Ziegler R (1992) Bone mass of spine and forearm in osteoporosis and in German normals: influences of sex, age and anthropometric parameters. Eur J Clin Invest 22:366–370
Kanis JA (1995) Treatment of osteoporosis in elderly women. Am J Med 98 (suppl 2A):60S-66S
Lai K, Rencken M, Drinkwater BL, Chesnut CH III (1993) Site of bone density measurement may affect therapy decision. Calcif Tissue Int 53:225–228
Greenspan SL, Greenspan FS, Resnick NM, Block JE, Friedlander AL, Genant HK (1991) Skeletal integrity in premenopausal and postmenopausal women receiving long-term L-thyroxine therapy. Am J Med 91:5–14
Greenspan SL, Oppenheim DS, Klibanski A (1989) Importance of gonadal steroids to bone mass in men with hyperprolactinemic hypogonadism. Ann Intern Med 110:526–531
Favus MJ (1993) Bone density reference data. In: Favus MJ (ed) Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism. Raven Press: New York. pp 426–430
Mazess RB, Barden HS, Eberle RW, Denton MD (1995) Age changes of spine density in posterior-anterior and lateral projections in normal women. Calcif Tissue Int 56:201–205
Blunt BA, Klauber MR, Barrett-Connor EL, Edelstein SL (1994) Sex differences in bone mineral density in 1653 men and women in the sixth through tenth decades of life: the Rancho Bernardo Study. J Bone Miner Res 9:1333
Adami S, Kanis JA (1995) Assessment of involutional bone loss: methodological and conceptual problems. J Bone Miner Res 10:511–517
Ryan PJ, Spector TP, Blake GM, Doyle DV, Fogelman I (1993) A comparison of reference bone mineral density measurements derived from two sources: referred and population based. Br J Radiol 66:1138–1141
Looker AC, Johnston Jr CC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP, Lindsay RL (1995) Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. women from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 10:796–802
Faulkner KG, Roberts LA, McClung MR (1995) Discrepancies in normative data between Hologic and Lunar systems (abstract). J Bone Miner Res 10(suppl 1):S146
Gluer CC, Steiger P, Selvidge R, Elliesen-Kliefoth K, Kayashi C, Genant HK (1990) Comparative assessment of dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy radiography. Radiology 174:223–228
Kelly TL, Slovik DM, Schoenfeld DA, Neer RM (1988) Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:839–844
Dans PE, Kerr MR (1979) Gerontology and geriatrics in medical education. N Engl J Med 300:228–232
Ross PD, David JW, Vogel JM, Wasnich RD (1990) A critical review of bone mass and the risk of fractures in osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 46:149–161
Greenspan SL, Myers ER, Maitland LA, Resnick NM, Hayes WC (1994) Fall severity and bone mineral density as risk factors for hip fracture in ambulatory elderly. JAMA 271:128–133
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greenspan, S.L., Maitland-Ramsey, L. & Myers, E. Classification of osteoporosis in the elderly is dependent on site-specific analysis. Calcif Tissue Int 58, 409–414 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509439
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509439