Abstract
Examined a dual-axis model of coping that included both action (active vs. passive) and social dimensions (prosocial vs. antisocial) of coping strategies among a combined sample of students and community residents. We developed an assessment device to represent the model and allow investigation. Mixed support for the model and instrument were noted. Women were more prosocial than men in their coping, but no less active. Men were more likely to use antisocial and aggressive, but less assertive coping strategies than women. More prosocial, action coping strategies were also more likely to be related to greater sense of mastery and more liberal gender-role orientation. Antisocial and passive strategies tended to be related to lower mastery and more traditional gender-role orientation. Active coping was related to lower emotional distress for men and women, but both prosocial and antisocial coping were related to greater emotional distress for men, suggesting that men may have a narrower band of beneficial coping strategies than do women.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adler, A. (1939).Social interest: A challenge to mankind. New York: Putnam.
Amirkhan, J. H. (1990). A factor analytically derived measure of coping: The coping strategy indicator.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1066–1074.
Aneshensel, C. S., & Pearlin, L. I. (1987). Structural contexts of sex differences in stress. In R. C. Barnett, L. Biener, & G. K. Baruch (Eds.),Gender and stress. New York: Free Press.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.
Billings, A. G., & Moos, R. H. (1984). Coping, stress, and social resources among adults with unipolar depression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 877–891.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283.
Cattell, R. B. (1978).The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum Press.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.
Coyne, J. C. (1992, August 16). But life is not a controlled experiment: Problems in the assessment of coping. In Y. S. Ben-Porath (Chair),What is coping and does it matter? Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
DeLongis, A., O'Brien, T., & Parker, S. (1990). A cognitive-interpersonal formulation of the stress process among family caregivers of Alzheimer's patients. In M. Stephens, J. Crowther, S. Hobfoll, & D. Tannenbaum (Eds.),Stress and coping in later life families, Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Dohrenwend, B. S., Krasnoff, L., Askenasy, A. R., & Dohrenwend, B. P. (1978). Exemplification of a method for scaling life events: The PERI life events scale.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 205–229.
Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1990). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844–854.
Erickson, E. (1968).Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample.Journal of Health and Social Support, 21, 219–239.
Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992–1003.
Gotlib, I., & Hooley, J. M. (1988). Depression and marital distress: Current status and future directions. In S. Duck, S. E. Hobfoll, B. Ickes, & B. Montgomery (Eds.),Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (pp. 543–570). London: Wiley.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1988).The ecology of stress. New York: Hemisphere.
Hobfoll, S. E., Banerjee, P., & Britton, P. J. (in press). Stress resistance resources and health. In. S. Maes, H. Leventhal, & M. Johnston (Eds.),International review of health psychology, New York: Wiley.
Hobfoll, S. E., & Dunahoo, C. (1991).Dual axis model of coping. Unpublished manuscript.
Hobfoll, S. E., & Lerman, M. (1989). Predicting receipt of social support: A longitudinal study of parents' reactions to their child's illness.Health Psychology, 8, 61–77.
Hobfoll, S. E., & Stokes, J. P. (1988). The process and mechanics of social support. In S. Duck (Ed.),Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 497–517). New York: Wiley.
Hobfoll, S. E., & Walfisch, S. (1984). Coping with a threat to life: A longitudinal study of self concept, social support and psychological distress.American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 87–100.
Johnson, E. H. (1990).The deadly emotions: The role of anger, hostility, and aggression in health and emotional well-being. New York: Praeger.
Kobasa, S. C., & Puccetti, M. C. (1983). Personality and social resources in stress resistance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 839–850.
Lane, C., & Hobfoll, S. E. (1992). How loss affects anger and alienates potential supporters.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 935–942.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984).Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
Lefcourt, H. M., Martin, R. A., & Selah, W. E. (1984). Locus of control and social support: Interactive moderators of stress.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 378–389.
Levo, L. M., & Biggs, D. (1989). Cognitive factors in effectively coping with home/career stress.Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 3.
Long, B. C. (1989). Sex-role orientation, coping strategies, and self-efficacy of women in traditional and nontraditional occupations.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 307–324.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1986). Personality, coping, and coping effectiveness in an adult sample.Journal of Personality, 54, 384–405.
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2–21.
Powell, G. N. (1988).Women and men in management. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement,1, 385–401.
Rohde, P., Lewinsohn, P. M., Tilson, M., & Seeley, J. R. (1990). Dimensionality of coping and its relation to depression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 499–511.
Roth, S., & Cohen, L. J. (1989). Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress.American Psychologist, 41, 813–819.
Sandler, I. N., & Lakey, B. (1982). Locus of control as a stress moderator: The role of control perceptions and social support.American Journal of Community Psychology, 10, 65–80.
Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Pierce, G. R. (Eds.), (1990).Social support: An interactional view. New York: Wiley.
Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., Shearin, E. N., & Pierce, G. R. (1987). A brief measure of social support: Practical and theoretical implications.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 497–510.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Sawin, L. L. (1980). The male-female relations questionnaire: A self-report inventory of sex-role behaviors and preferences and its relationships to masculine and feminine personality traits, sex role attitudes, and other measures.JSAS Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 87.
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970).STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychological Press.
Stone, A. A., Greenberg, M. A., Kennedy-Moore, E., & Newman, M. G. (1991). Self-report, situation-specific coping questionnaires: What are they measuring?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 648–658.
Stone, A. A., & Neale, J. M. (1984). New measure of daily coping: Development and preliminary results.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 892–906.
Sullivan, H. S. (1953).The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.
Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006–1020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was made possible, in part, by a grant from the National Institute of Health (R01-HD24901-01) and by support of the Kent State Applied Psychology Center, which was established through the support of the Ohio Board of Regents.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hobfoll, S.E., Dunahoo, C.L., Ben-Porath, Y. et al. Gender and coping: The dual-axis model of coping. Am J Commun Psychol 22, 49–82 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506817
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506817