Abstract
Research in the past decade suggests that persistent gender gaps in math achievement may be rooted in gender differences in math self-concept. Yet, limited research exists on how students' math self-concept develops, and whether this differs between men and women. Using a sample of 8,997 women and 6,053 men, this study examines the factors associated with the development of women's and men's mathematical self-concept during college. Findings reveal a number of student background characteristics and college environments and experiences that contribute to an overall decline in math self-concept during college, and show how college reinforces the gender gap in math confidence. Additionally, in an attempt to answer the perennial question of whether it is “better to be a big frog in a small pond or a small frog in a big pond,” the study pays special attention to the relationship between institutional selectivity and math self-concept. Although institutional selectivity is correlated with declines in math self-concept, results show that specific aspects of selective environments, rather than selectivity itself, are more important predictors of math self-concept.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Astin, A. W. (1977).Four Critical Years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Astin, A. W. (1991).Assessment for Excellence. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Astin, A. W. (1993).What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Astin, A. W., and Panos, R. J. (1969).The Educational and Vocational Development of College Students. Washington, DC: The American Council on Education.
Astin, H. S. (1978). Patterns of women's occupations. In J. A. Sherman and F. L. Denmark (eds.),The Psychology of Women: Future Directions in Research. New York: Psychological Dimensions, Inc
Astin, H. S., and Kent, L. (1983). Gender roles in transition: Research and policy implications for higher education.Journal of Higher Education 54(3): 309–324.
Bailey, R. C. (1971). Self-concept differences in low and high achieving students.Journal of Clinical Psychology 27(2): 188–191.
Bargh, J. A., and Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching.Journal of Educational Psychology 72(5): 593–604.
Bassis, M. S. (1977). The campus as a frog pond: A theoretical and empirical reassessment.American Journal of Sociology 82(6): 1318–1326.
Benbow, C. P., and Stanley, J. C. (1982). Consequences in high school and college of sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability.American Educational Research Journal 19(4): 598–622.
Byrne, B. M. (1984). The general/academic nomological network: A review of construct validation research.Review of Educational Research 54(3): 427–456.
Caporrimo, R. (1990). Gender, confidence, math: Why aren't the girls “where the boys are?” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
Davis, J. A. (1966). The campus as a frog pond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions of college men.American Journal of Sociology 72(1): 17–31.
de Wolf, V. A. (1981). High school mathematics preparation and sex differences in quantitative abilities.Psychology of Women Quarterly 5(4): 555–567.
Drew, D. E. (1992). Affective and behavioral components of undergraduate science education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Drew, D. E., and Astin, A. W. (1972). Undergraduate aspirations: A test of several theories.American Journal of Sociology 77(6): 1151–1164.
Ethington, C. A. (1988). Differences among women intending to major in quantitative fields of study.Journal of Educational Research 81(6): 354–359.
Ethington, C. A., and Wolfle, L. M. (1984). Sex differences in a causal model of mathematics achievement.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 15(5): 361–377.
Hansford, B. C., and Hattie, J. A. (1982). The relationship between self and achievement/performance measures.Review of Educational Research 52(1): 123–142.
Higher Education Research Institute (1991).The American College Student, 1989: National Norms for 1985 and 1987 Freshmen Classes. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., and Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect: A meta-analysis.Psychology of Women Quarterly 14: 299–324.
Kimura, D. (1992, September). Sex differences in the brain.Scientific American, pp. 119–125.
MacCorquodale, P. (1984).Self-Image, Science, and Math: Does the Image of the “Scientist” Keep Girls and Minorities from Pursuing Science and Math?. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Marsh, H. W. (1984a). Self-concept, social comparison, and ability grouping: A reply to Kulik and Kulik.American Educational Research Journal 21(4): 799–806.
Marsh, H. W. (1984b). Self-concept: The application of a frame of reference model to explain paradoxical results.Australian Journal of Education 28(2): 165–181.
Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model.American Educational Research Journal 23(1): 129–149.
Marsh, H. W., and Parker, J. W. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(1): 213–231.
Marsh, H. W., Smith, I. D., and Barnes, J. (1985). Multidimensional self-concepts: Relations with sex and academic achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology 77(5): 581–596.
Meece, J. L., Parsons, J. E., Kaczala, C. M., Goff, S. B., and Futterman, R. (1982). Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice.Psychological Bulletin 91: 324–348.
Pascarella, E. T. (1985a). Students' effective development within the college environment.Journal of Higher Education 56(6): 640–663.
Pascarella, E. T. (1985b). The influence of on-campus living versus commuting to college on intellectual and interpersonal self-confidence.Journal of College Student Personnel 26: 292–299.
Pascarella, E. T. (Undated). Academic and interpersonal experiences as mediators of the structural effects of college. Unpublished manuscript.
Pascarella, E. T., Smart, J. C., Ethington, C. A., and Nettles, M. T. (1987). The influence of college on self-concept: A consideration of race and gender differences.American Educational Research Journal 24(1): 49–77.
Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T. (1991).How College Affects Students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Patterson, M. (1976).The Impact of Colleges and Universities on the Educational Aspirations of Women. University of California, Santa Barbara. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Reitz, J. G. (1975). Undergraduate aspirations and career choice: Effects of college selectivity.Sociology of Education 48: 308–323.
Selkow, P. (1985). Male/female differences in mathematical ability: A function of biological sex or perceived gender role?.Psychological Reports 57: 551–557.
Shavelson, R. J., and Bolus, R. (1982). Self-concept: The interplay of theory and methods.Journal of Educational Psychology 74(1): 3–17.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J. and Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations.Review of Educational Research 46(3): 407–441.
Sherman, J. (1982). Continuing in mathematics: A longitudinal study of the attitudes of high school girls.Psychology of Women Quarterly 7(2): 132–140.
Sherman, J. (1983). Factors predicting girls' and boys' enrollment in college preparatory methematics.Psychology of Women Quarterly 7(3): 272–281.
Smart, J. C. and Pascarella, E. T. (1986). Self-concept development and educational degree attainment.Higher Education 15 3–15.
Thistlethwaite, D. L., and Wheeler, N. (1966). Effects of teacher and peer subcultures upon student aspirations.Journal of Educational Psychology 57(1): 35–47.
Tobias, S. (1990).They're Not Dumb, They're Different—Stalking the Second Tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
Werts, C. E., and Watley, D. J. (1969). A student's dilemma: Big fish—little pond or little fish—big pond.Journal of Counseling Psychology 16(1): 14–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sax, L.J. Mathematical self-concept: How college reinforces the gender gap. Res High Educ 35, 141–166 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496699
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496699