Abstract
Embryology allows one to work with a wide array of characters (more than 50 in general) for each taxon of angiosperms. This paper, while providing a brief review of recent studies on Myrtales and associated families by me and my co-workers, discusses evidence for the general utility of embryological characters for the study of plant systematics. In particular, evidence is given that characters of seed coat anatomy may be best applied to the study of specific and sectional (and even familial) relationships, those of seed appendages as well as of integumentary morphology and histogenesis to the study of generic relationships, and other major characters to the study of familial relationships. Embryology thus provides many features that are complex and, when properly applied along with evidence from other sources, offers good indications of relationships at various taxonomic level, from the ordinal to the specific level. Despite its evident systematic value and increasing need, however, information on embryological characters is still lacking for a majority of genera, and even at the family level, data is lacking or insufficiently available for more than 30% of families.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bouman, F. 1974. Developmental studies of the ovule and integuments in some angiosperms. Thesis. Univ. of Amsterdam.
Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia Univ. Press. New York.
— 1988. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants, 2nd ed. The New York Bot. Gard., New York.
Dahlgren, R. 1975. The distribution of characters within an angiosperm system. I. Some embryological characters. Bot. Notiser128: 181–197.
— 1983. General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. Nord. J. Bot.3: 119–149.
— 1988. Rhizophoraceae and Anisophylleaceae: summary statement, relationships. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 1259–1277.
— andR.F. Thorne. 1984. The order Myrtales: circumscription, variation, and relationships. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.71: 633–699.
Davis, G.L. 1966. Systematic Embryology of the Angiosperms. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
George, G.P., R.A. George andJ.M. Herr, Jr. 1979. A comparative study of ovule and megagametophyte development in field-grown and greenhouse-grown plants ofGlycine max andPhaseolus aureus (Papilionaceae). Amer. J. Bot.66: 1033–1043.
Goldblatt, P., H. Tobe, S. Carlquist andP. Patel. 1985. Familial position of the Cape genusEmpleuridium. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.72: 167–183.
Herr, Jr. J.M. 1971. A new clearing-squash technique for the study of ovule development in angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot.58: 785–790.
— 1973. The use of Nomarski-interference microscopy for the study of structural features in cleared ovules. Acta Bot. Indica1: 35–40.
— 1984. Embryology and taxonomy.In B.M. Johri, ed., Embryology of Angiosperms, pp. 647–796. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Johansen, D.A. 1940. Plant Microtechnique. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Johnson, L.A.S. andB.G. Briggs. 1984. Myrtales and Myrtaceae—a phylogenetic analysis. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.71: 700–756.
Juncosa, A.M. andH. Tobe. 1988. Embryology of tribe Gynotrocheae (Rhizophoraceae) and its developmental and systematic implications. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 1410–1424.
Maheshwari, P. 1950. An Introduction to the Embryology of Angiosperms. McGraw-Hill, New York.
— 1963. Embryology in relation to taxonomy. Vistas in Botany4: 55–97.
— andR.N. Kapil. 1966. Some Indian contributions to the embryology of angiosperms. Phytomorphology16: 239–291.
Melchior, H. (ed.) 1964. A Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. 2. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.
Palser, B.F. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: embryology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 621–646.
Philipson, W.R. 1974. Ovular morphology and the major classification of the dicotyledons. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.68: 89–108.
Prance, G.T. 1972. Chrysobalanaceae. Flora Neotropica Monogr. No. 9. Hafner Publ., New York.
Raven, P.H. 1984. The order Myrtales: a symposium. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.71: 631–632.
— 1988. Onagraceae as a model of plant evolution.In L.D. Gottlieb and S.K. Jain, ed., Plant Evolutionary Biology, pp. 85–107. Chapman and Hall, London.
Rodkiewicz, B. 1967. Walls with callose in the megaspore and hypostase of ovules ofAntirrhinum majus observed in a fluorescence microscope. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., Sér. Sci. Biol.15: 493–495.
— 1970. Callose in cell walls during megasporogenesis in angiosperms. Planta93: 39–47.
Schmid, R. 1972. A resolution of theEugenia-Syzygium controversy (Myrtaceae). Amer. J. Bot.59: 423–435.
Schnarf, K. 1929. Embryologie der Angiospermen. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.
— 1931. Vergleichende Embryologie der Angiospermen. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.
Shith, B.B. 1975. A quantitative analysis of the megagametophyte of five species orCornus L. Amer. J. Bot.62: 387–394.
Tobe, H. 1989. Reproductive morphology, anatomy and relationships ofTicodendron. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.76: (in press).
— and —. 1983a. An embryological analysis of Myrtales: its definition and characteristics. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.70: 71–94.
— and —. 1983b. The embryology ofAxinandra zeylanica (Crypteroniaceae) and the relationships of the genus. Bot. Gaz.114: 426–432.
— andP.H. Raven. 1984a. The number of cells in the pollen of Melastomataceae (Myrtales). Bot. Mag. Tokyo97: 131–136.
— and —. 1984b. The embryology and relationships of Oliniaceae. Plant Syst. Evol.146: 105–116.
— and —. 1984c. The embryology and relationships of Penaeaceae (Myrtales). Plant Syst. Evol.146: 181–195.
— and —. 1984d. An embryological contribution to systematics of the Chrysobalanaceae I. Tribe Chrysobalaneae. Bot. Mag. Tokyo.97: 397–411.
— and —. 1984e. The embryology and relationships ofRhynchocalyx Oliv. (Myrtales). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.71: 836–843.
— and —. 1984f. The embryology and relationships ofAlzatea Ruiz & Pav. (Myrtales). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.71: 844–852.
— and —. 1985. The histogenesis and evolution of integuments in Onagraceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.72: 291–316.
— and —. 1986. The evolution of polysporangiate anthers in Onagraceae. Amer. J. Bot.73: 475–488.
— and —. 1987a. The embryology and relationships ofCassipourea andSterigmapetalum (Rhizophoraceae-Macarisieae). Opera Bot.92: 253–264.
— and —. 1987b. A comparative study of the embryology ofLudwigia (Onagraceae): characteristics, variations, and relationships. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.73: 768–787.
— and —. 1987c. Embryology and systematic position ofHeteropyxis (Myrtales). Amer. J. Bot.74: 197–208.
— and —. 1987d. The embryology and relationships ofCrypteronia (Crypteroniaceae). Bot. Gaz.148: 96–102.
— and —. 1987e. The embryology and relationships ofDactylocladus (Crypteroniaceae) and a discussion of the family. Bot. Gaz.148: 103–111.
— and —. 1987f. Systematic embryology of the Anisophylleaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.74: 1–26.
— and —. 1988a. Seed morphology and anatomy of Rhizophoraceae, inter- and infrafamilial relationships. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 1319–1342.
— and —. 1988b. Additional notes on the embryology ofPolygonanthus (Anisophylleaceae) and relationships of the family. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 1425–1428.
— and —. 1988c. Floral morphology and evolution in Anisophylleaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.98: 1–25.
— and —. 1989. The embryology and systematic position ofRhabdodendron (Rhabdodendraceae).In Kit Tanet al., ed., Plant Taxonomy, Phytogeography and Related Subjects, pp. 221–236. Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh.
— and — andC.-I. Peng. 1988. Seed coat anatomy and relationships ofLudwigia sects.Microcarpium, Dantia andMiquelia (Onagraceae), and notes on fossil seeds ofLudwigia from Europe. Bot. Gaz.149: 450–457.
—,W.L. Wagner andH.-C. Chin. 1987. A systematic and evolutionary study ofOenothera: seed coat anatomy. Bot. Gaz.148: 235–257.
van Vliet, G.J.C.M. andP. Baas 1984. Wood anatomy and classification of the Myrtales. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.71: 783–800.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Recipient of the Botanical Society Award for Young Scientists, 1987.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tobe, H. The embryology of angiosperms: Its broad application to the systematic and evolutionary study. Bot Mag Tokyo 102, 351–367 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488572
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488572