Abstract
The propensity for two types of charge-balanced stimulus waveforms to induce injury during eight hours of continuous electrical stimulation of the cat sciatic nerve was investigated. One waveform was a biphasic, controlled-current pulse pair, each phase 50 μs in duration, with no delay between the phases (‘short pulse’, selected to excite primarily large axons), whereas in the second type each phase was 100 μs in duration, with a 400 μs delay between the phases (selected to excite axons of a broader spectrum of diameters). The sciatic nerve was examined for early axonal degeneration (EAD) seven days after the session of continuous stimulation. With both waveforms, the threshold stimulus current for axonal injury was greater than the current required to excite all of the nerve's large axons. The correlation between simple stimulus parameters and the amount of EAD was poor, especially with the ‘short pulse’ waveform, probably due to variability between animals. When the stimulus was normalised with respect to the current required to fully recruit the large axons, a good association between damage and stimulus amplitude emerged. The damage threshold was higher for the ‘short pulse’ waveform. The implications for clinical protocols are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Agnew, W. F., McCreery, D. B., Yuen, T. G. H. andBullara, L. A. (1989) Histologic and physiologic evaluation of electrically stimulated peripheral nerve: considerations for the selection of parameters.Ann. Biomed. Eng.,17, 39–60.
Agnew, W. F., McCreery, D. B., Yuen, T. G. H. andBullara, L. A. (1990) Local anaesthetic block protects against electrically-induced damage in peripheral nerve.J. Biomed. Eng.,12, 301–308.
Crago, P. E., Peckham, P. H., Mortimer, J. T. andVan der Meulen, J. P. (1974) The choice of pulse duration for chronic electrical stimulation via surface, nerve and intramuscular electrodes.Ann. Biomed. Eng.,2, 252–264.
DeGroat, W. C. andBooth, A. M. (1980) Physiology of the urinary bladder and urethra.Ann. Intern. Med.,92, 312–315.
Gorman, P. H. andMortimer, J. T. (1983) The effect of stimulus parameters on the recruitment characteristics of direct stimulation.IEEE Trans.,BME-30, 407–414.
Herdan, G. (1955)Statistics of therapeutic trials. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 180–186.
McCreery, D. B., Agnew, W. F., Yuen, T. G. H. andBullara, L. A. (1990) Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in the induction of neural injury by electrical stimulation.IEEE Trans.,BME-37, 996–1001.
Naples, G. G., Mortimer, J. T. andYuen, T. G. H. (1990) Overview of peripheral nerve electrode design and implantation. InNeural prostheses; fundamental studies.Agnew, W. F. andMcCreery, D. B. (Eds.), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 131–132.
Ranck, J. B. Jr (1975) Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system?: a review.Brain Res.,98, 417–440.
Robblee, L. S. andRose, T. L. (1990) Materials for electrodes for neural stimulation. InNeural prostheses; fundamental studies.Agnew, W. F. andMcCreery, D. B. (Eds.), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 25–66.
Ruch, T. C. andFulton, J. F. (1960)Medical physiology and biophysics. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 79–82.
Tanagho, E. A., Schmidt, R. A. andDeAraujo, C. G. (1982) Urinary striated sphincter: what is its nerve supply?Invest. Urol.,20, 415–417.
Yuen, T. G. H., Agnew, W. F., Bullara, L. A., Jacques, P. andMcCreery, D. B. (1981) Histological evaluation of neural damage from electrical stimulation: considerations for the selection of parameters for clinical application.Neurosurg.,9, 292–299.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCreery, D.B., Agnew, W.F., Yuen, T.G.H. et al. Damage in peripheral nerve from continuous electrical stimulation: Comparison of two stimulus waveforms. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 30, 109–114 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02446202
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02446202