Abstract
Debate over the original adaptive significance of the lemuriform toothcomb, whether it was principally a grooming organ or a scraper-feeding tool, currently hinges upon the functional morphology of the lower incisors and canines of lemurs and lorises, and the fossil adapids thought to be their ancestors or structural prototypes. We suggest that the morphology of the upper incisors and the oronasal complex of the latter, given the context of a more general theory of incisor evolution within the primates, exhibits preadaptive conditions foreshadowing the emergence of the toothcomb and also evidence of strepsirhine monophyly. We find in all underived lemuriforms and in most fossil adapids where the elements are known, a striking continuity in upper incisor form, including such derived features as an interincisal diastema, strong central incisor prong, low-crowned morphology and reduced premaxillary size. The pattern suggests a basic strepsirhine reduction in the functional significance of the anterior dentition in feeding and harvesting roles. These features may be related to a novel connection of the rhinarium with the vomeronasal organ via a sulcate pair of labial folds, which serves as a component of a specialized behavioral-physiological complex dealing with olfactory communication. Rather than being the anatomical nucleus of this system, the toothcomb may have been added secondarily in the lemuriform descendants of the preadapted adapids, possibly as a device to stimulate glandular secretion of pheromones by direct pressure, and to simultaneously distribute odorants through the fur.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bailey, K., 1978.Flehmen in the ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta).Behaviour, 65: 309–319.
Bock, W. J., 1981. Functional-adaptive analysis in evolutionary classification.Amer. Zool., 21: 5–20.
Beecher, R. M., 1983. Evolution of the mandibular symphysis in Notharchinae (Adapidae, Primates).Int. J. Primatol., 4: 99–112.
Buettner-Janusch, J. &R. M. Andrew, 1962. Use of the incisors by primates in grooming.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 20: 127–129.
Cartmill, M. &R. F. Kay, 1978. Craniodental morphology, tarsier affinities and primate sub-orders. In:Recent Advances in Primatology, Vol. 3, Evolution,D. J. Chivers &K. A. Josey (eds.), Academic Press, London, pp. 205–213.
Clark, A. B., 1978. Olfactory communication.Galago crassicaudatus and the social life of prosimians. In:Recent Advances in Primatology, Vol. 1, Behaviour,D. J. Chivers &J. Herbert (eds.), Academic Press, London, pp. 109–117.
Cooper, J. G. &K. P. Bhatnagar, 1976. Comparative anatomy of the vomeronasal organ complex in bats.J. Anat., 122: 571–601.
Dagosto, M., 1984. Postcranium ofAdapis parisiensis andLeptadapis magnus (Adapiformes, Primates). Adaptational and phylogenetic significance.Folia Primatol., 41: 49–101.
Estes, R. D., 1972. The role of the vomeronasal organ in mammalian reproduction.Mammalia, 36: 315–341.
Gingerich, P. D., 1975. Dentition ofAdapis parisiensis and the evolution of the lemuriform toothcomb. In:Lemur Biology,I. Tattersall &R. W. Sussman (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 65–80.
----, 1976. Cranial anatomy and evolution of early Tertiary Plesiadapidae (Mammalia, Primates).Mus. Paleon., Univ. of Michigan, Pap. on Paleon., 15.
———— &R. D. Martin, 1981. Cranial morphology and adaptations in Eocene Adapidae. II. The Cambridge skull ofAdapis parisiensis.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 56: 235–257.
Gregory, W. K., 1920. On the structure and relations ofNotharctus, an American Eocene primate.Mem. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 3: 51–243.
————, 1922.The Origin and Evolution of the Human Dentition. MacMillan, New York.
Hofer, H. O., 1977. The anatomical relations of the ductus vomeronasalis and the occurrence of taste buds in the papilla palatina ofNycticebus coucang (Primates, Prosimiae) with remarks on strepsirhinism.Gegen. Morph. Jahrb., 123: 836–856.
————, 1980. The external anatomy of the oro-nasal region of primates.Z. Morphol., 71: 233–249.
————, 1982. Anatomy of the oro-nasal region of some species of Tenrecidae and considerations of Tupaiids and Lemurids.Gegen. Morphol. Jahrb., 4: 588–613.
Jolly, A., 1963.Lemur Behavior. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kay, R. F., 1980. Platyrrhine origins: A reappraisal of the dental evidence. In:Evolutionary Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continental Drift,R. L. Ciochon &A. Brunetto Chiarelli (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 159–188.
Kielan-Jaworowska, Z., T. M. Bown &J. A. Lillegraven, 1979. Eutheria. In:Mesozoic Mammals,J. A. Lillegraven,Z. Kielan-Jaworowska &W. A. Clemens (eds.), Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 221–258.
Kinzey, W. G., A. L. Rosenberger &M. Ramirez, 1975. Vertical clinging and leaping in a Neotropical anthropoid.Nature, 225: 327–328.
Le Gros Clark, W. E., 1959.The Antecedents of Man. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
———— &D. P. Thomas, 1952. The Miocene lemuroids of East Africa.Fos. Mam. Afr., 5: 1–20.
Luckett, W. P., 1982.Comparative Biology and Evolutionary Relationships of Tree Shrews. Plenum Press, New York.
Maier, W., 1979. A new dental formula for the Tupaiiformes.J. Human Evol., 8: 319–321.
————, 1980a. Nasal structure in Old and New World primates. In:Evolutionary Biology of New World Monkeys and Continental Drift,R. L. Ciochon &A. Brunetto Chiarelli (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 219–241.
————, 1980b. Konstruktionsmorphologische Untersuchengen an Gebiss der rezenten Prosimiae (Primates).Abh. Senckenb. Naturforsch. Ges., 538: 1–158.
Martin, R. D., 1972. Adaptive variation of behavior of Malagasy lemurs.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (B), 26: 295–352.
————, 1973. Comparative anatomy and primate systematics.Symp. Zool. Soc. London, 33: 301–337.
————, 1979. Phylogenetic aspects of prosimian behavior. In:Studies of Prosimian Behavior,G. A. Doyle &R. D. Martin (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 45–77.
Miller, M. E., 1964.Anatomy of the Dog. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
Rose, K. D., A. Walker &L. L. Jacobs, 1981. Function of the mandibular toothcomb in living and extinct mammals.Nature, 289: 583–585.
Rosenberger, A. L., M. E. Strasser & E. Delson, 1985. Anterior dentition ofNotharctus and the adapid-anthropoid hypothesis.Folia Primatol.
———— &F. S. Szalay, 1980. On the tarsiiform origin of Anthropoidea. In:Evolutionary Biology of New World Monkeys and Continental Drift,R. L. Ciochon &A. Brunetto Chiarelli (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 139–157.
Schilling, A., 1979. Olfactory communication in prosimians. In:Studies of Prosimian Behavior,G. A. Doyle &R. D. Martin (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 461–542.
Schwartz, J. H., I. Tattersall &N. Eldredge, 1978. Phylogeny and classification of the primates revisited.Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol., 21: 95–133.
Simons, E. L., 1972.Primate Evolution: An Introduction to Man's Place in Nature. Macmillan, New York.
Simpson, G. G., 1940. Studies on the earliest primates.Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 77: 185–212.
Stehlin, H. G., 1916. Die Saugetiere de schweizerischen Eozans. Critischer Catalog de Materialien, 7. Teil 2, Halfte.Abhand. Schweiz. Palaeont. Ges., 51: 1299–1552.
Stephan von, H. &O. J. Andy, 1969. Quantitative comparative neuroanatomy of primates: an attempt at phylogenetic interpretation.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 167: 370–387.
————,G. Baron &H. D. Frahm, 1982. Comparison of brain structure volumes in Insectivora and Primates. II. Accessory Olfactory bulb (ABO).J. Hirnforsch., 23: 575–591.
Szalay, F. S., 1976. Systematics of the Omomyidae (Tarsiiformes, Primates): taxonomy, phylogeny and adaptations.Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 156: 157–450.
————, 1981. Functional analysis and the practice of the phylogenetic method as reflected by some mammalian studies.Amer. Zool., 21: 37–45.
———— &E. Delson, 1979.Evolutionary History of the Primates. Academic Press, New York.
———— &C. Katz, 1973. Phylogeny of lemurs, galagos and lorises.Folia Primatol., 19: 88–103.
———— &D. Seligsohn, 1977. Why did the strepsirhine toothcomb evolve?Folia Primatol., 27: 75–82.
Walker, A., 1969. New evidence from Uganda regarding the dentition of Miocene Lorisidae.Uganda J., 33: 90–91.
Wohrmann-Repenning, A., 1978. Geschmacksknospen an der Papillan palatina vonTupaia glis (Diard, 1920), ihr Vorkommen und ihre Beziehung zum Jacobsonschen Organ.Gegen. Morph. Jahrb., 124: 375–384.
Wysocki, C. J., 1979. Neurobehavioral evidence for the involvement of the vomeonasal system in Mammalian reproduction.Neuros. Biobehav. Rev., 3: 301–341.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Rosenberger, A.L., Strasser, E. Toothcomb origins: Support for the grooming hypothesis. Primates 26, 73–84 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02389048
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02389048