Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the electrical properties of the encapsulation tissue that surrounds electrodes chronically implanted in the body. Two four-electrode arrays, fabricated from either epoxy or silicone rubber, were implanted in each of six adult cats for 82 to 156 days.In vivo measurements of tissue resistivity using the four-electrode technique indicated that formation of the encapsulation tissue resulted in a significant increase in the resistivity of the tissue around the arrays.In vitro measurements of tissue impedance using a four-electrode cell indicated that the resistivity of the encapsulation tissue was a function of the tissue morphology. The tight layers of fibroblasts and collagen that formed around the silicone rubber arrays had a resistivity of 627±108 Ω-cm (mean ± SD; n=6), which was independent of frequency from 10 Hz to 100 kHz, and was significantly larger than the resistivity of the epoxy encapsulation tissue at all frequencies between 20 Hz and 100 kHz. The combination of macrophages, foreign body giant cells, loose collagen, and fibroblasts that formed around the epoxy arrays had a frequency-dependent resistivity that decreased from 454±123 Ω-cm (n=5) to 193±98 Ω-cm between 10 Hz and 1 kHz, and was independent of frequency between 1 kHz and 100 kHz, with a mean value of 195 ±88 Ω-cm. The results indicate that the resistivity of the encapsulation tissue is sufficient to alter the shape and magnitude of the electric field generated by chronically implanted electrodes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- ρ:
-
apparent resistivity of tissue around arrays measuredin vivo
- V:
-
magnitude of the voltage response measured between the inner pair of electrodes on an array
- I:
-
magnitude of the current applied between the outer pair of electrodes on an array
- a:
-
interelectrode spacing on the array
- f :
-
sinusoidal frequency
- ρ(f):
-
resistivity of encapsulation tissue measuredin vitro
- V(f):
-
voltage response measured with tissue in the cell
- Vos(f):
-
offset voltage response measured without tissue in the cell
- A:
-
cross-sectional area of the interior of the four-electrode cell
- I(f):
-
current applied between the outer pair of electrodes in the cell
- t:
-
thickness of tissue samples measured from fixed and stained samples
References
Ackmann, J.J.; Seitz, M.A. Methods of complex impedance measurements in biologic tissue. CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 11:281–311; 1984.
Agnew, W.F.; McCreery, D.B.; Yuen, T.G.H.; Bullara, L.A. Histologic and physiologic evaluation of electrically stimulated peripheral nerve: considerations for the selection of parameters. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 17:39–60; 1989.
Anderson, J.M. Inflammatory response to implants. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Int. Organs Vol. XXXIV:101–107; 1988.
Bartlett, J.R.; Doty, R.W.; Lee, B.B.; Negrao, N.; Overman, w.H. Deleterious effects of prolonged electrical stimulation of striate cortex in macaques. Brain Behav. Evol. 14:46–66; 1977.
Bak, M.; Girvin, J.P.; Hambrecht, F.T.; Kufta, C.V.; Loeb, G.E.; Schmidt, E.M. Visual sensations produced by intracortical microstimulation of the human occipital cortex. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 28:257–259; 1991.
Brindley, G.S.; Lewin, W.S. The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 196:479–493; 1968.
Chintalacharuvu, R.R.; Ksienski, D.A.; Mortimer, J.T. A numerical analysis of the electric field generated by a nerve cuff electrode. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 13:912–913; 1991.
Chintalacharuvu, R.R.; Ksienski, D.A.; Mortimer, J.T. A numerical analysis of the electric field generated by a nerve cuff electrode using the finite element method. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1994 (in press).
Coleman, D.L.; King, R.N.; Andrade, J.D. The foreign body reaction: a chronic inflammatory response. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 8:199–211; 1974.
De Luca, C.J.; Gilmore, L.D.; Bloom, L.J.; Thomson, S.J.; Cudworth, A.L.; Glimcher, M.J. Long-term neuroelectric signal recording from severed nerves. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 29:393–402; 1982.
Devore, J.L. Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences, ed. 2. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole; 1987: pp. 608–614.
Eisenberg, R.S.; Mathias, R.T. Structural analysis of electrical properties of cells and tissues. CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 4:203–232; 1980.
Geddes, L.A.; Baker, L.E. The specific resistance of biological material—a compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist. Med. Biol. Eng. 5:271–293; 1967.
Grandjean, P.A.; Mortimer, J.T. Recruitment properties of monopolar and bipolar epimysial electrodes. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 14:53–66; 1986.
Grill, W.M.; Veraart, C.; Mortimer, J.T. Selective activation of peripheral nerve fascicles: use of field steering currents. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 13:904–905; 1991.
Grill, W.M.; Mortimer, J.T. Electrical impedance of electrode encapsulation tissue. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 14:1376–1377; 1992.
Lefurge, T.; Goodall, E.; Horch, K.; Stensaas, L.; Schoenberg, A. Chronically implanted intrafascicular recording electrodes. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 19:197–207; 1991.
Loeb, G.E.; McHardy, J.; Kelliher, E.M.; Brummer, S.B. Neural prostheses.In: Williams, D.F.; ed. Biocompatibility in clinical practice, vol II. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press; 1982: pp. 123–149.
Malek, A.M.; Mark, R.G. Functional electrical stimulation for the latissimus dorsi muscle for use in cardiac assist. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36:781–788; 1989.
Marsolais, E.B.; Kobetic, R. Functional electrical stimulation for walking in paraplegia. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am] 69-A:728–733; 1987.
Martau, J.M. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of chronic electrical block of the pudenal nerve. M.S. Thesis. Department of Biomedical Engineering. Case Western Reserve University. 1991.
Matlaga, B.F.; Yasenchak, L.P.; Salthouse, T.N. Tissue response to implanted polymers: the significance of sample shape. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 10:391–397; 1976.
McNamara, A.; Williams, D.F. The response to the intramuscular implantation of pure metals. Biomaterials 2:33–40; 1981.
Mortimer, J.T.; Kaufman, D.; Roessmann, U. Intramuscular electrical stimulation: tissue damage. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 8:235–244; 1980.
Naples, G.G.; Mortimer, J.T.; Yuen, T.G.H. Overview of peripheral nerve electrode design and implantation.In: Agnew, W.F.; McCreery, D.B.; eds. Neural prostheses: Fundamental Studies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1990: pp. 108–145.
Nashold, B.S., Jr.; Friedman, H. Dorsal column stimulation for control of pain. J. Neurosurg. 36:590–597; 1972.
Peckham, P.H.; Keith, M.W.; Freehafer, A.A. Restoration of functional control by electrical stimulation in the upper extremity of the quadriplegic patient. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am] 70:144–148; 1988.
Pineda, A. Complications of dorsal column stimulation. J. Neurosurg. 48:64–68; 1978.
Plonsey, R. Bioelectric phenomena. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1969: pp. 359–360.
Reynolds, A.F.; Shetter, A.G.. Scarring around cervical epidural stimulating electrode. Neurosurgery 13:63–64; 1983.
Robbins, S.L.; Cotran, R.S. Pathologic basis of disease. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1979: pp. 90–106.
Ross, R. Wound healing. Sci. Am. 220:40–50; 1969.
Rutten, W.L.C.; van Wier, H.J.; Put, J.H.M. Sensitivity and selectivity of intraneural stimulation using a silicon electrode array. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 38:192–198; 1991.
Schindler, R.A.; Merzenich, M.M.; eds. Cochlear implants. New York: Raven; 1985.
Schwan, H.P. Electrical properties of tissue and cell suspensions.In: Lawrence, J.H.; Tobias, L.A.; eds. Advances in biological and medical physics, vol. 5. New York: Academic Press; 1957: pp. 147–209.
Schwan, H.P. Determination of biological impedance.In: Natuk, W.L.; ed. Physical techniques in biological research. New York: Academic Press; 1963: pp. 323–407.
Stein, R.B.; Charles, D.; Gordon, T.; Hoffer, J.A.; Jhamandas, J. Impedance of metal electrodes for chronic recording from mammalian nerves. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 25:532–537; 1978.
Stensaas, S.S.; Stensaas, L.J. Histopathological evaluation of materials implanted in the cerebral cortex. Acta Neuropathol. 41:145–155; 1978.
Taylor, S.R.; Gibbons, D.F. Effect of surface texture of the soft tissue response to polymer implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 17:205–227; 1983.
Thoma, H.; Gerner, H.; Holle, J.; Kluger, P.; Mayr, W.; Meister, B.; Schwanda, G.; Stohr, H. The phrenic pacemaker: substitution of paralyzed functions in tetraplegia. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs Trans. 10:472–479; 1987.
Wood, N.K.; Kaminski, E.J.; Oglesby, R.J. The significance of implant shape in experimental testing of biological materials: disk vs. rod. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 4:1–12; 1970.
Ziaie, B.; Gianchandani, Y.; Najafi, K. A high-current IrOx thin-film neuromuscular microstimulator. Proc. Int. Solid-State Sensors and Actuators. Conf. 124–127; 1992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grill, W.M., Thomas Mortimer, J. Electrical properties of implant encapsulation tissue. Ann Biomed Eng 22, 23–33 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02368219
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02368219