Abstract
Large philanthropic foundations such as those which first developed in the United States in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century had four characteristics: (a) the aim of contributing to the public good; (b) applying science and scientific method to human affairs, interpreting science broadly; (c) using great wealth to pursue these purposes; and (d) seeking public recognition of their charitable status in doing so. Between 1870 and 1930 the large foundation emerged as a major social institution, and under the influence of their officers began to be major patrons of applied social science for public policy purposes. Critics of foundations have charged that they were private bodies without external accountability; they were secretive, undemocratic, unrepresentative and indeed pillars of the ruling class. Nevertheless, foundations have exercised a disproportionate influence upon public policy research and have sought to apply fundamental knowledge to tackling social problems. They represent the institutionalisation of knowledge-based social engineering.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arnove, R.F. (ed.) (1980)Philanthropy and Cultural Imperialism, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.
Booth, C. (1889–1903)Life and Labour of the People of London, 17 volumes, Macmillan, London.
Briggs, A. and Macartney, A. (1984)Toynbee Hall: The First Hundred Years, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Brown, E.R. (1979)Rockefeller Medicine Men: Medicine and Capitalism in America, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Bulmer, M. (1980) The early institutional establishment of social science research: the Local Community Research Committee at the University of Chicago, 1923–1930.Minerva XVIII, Spring, 51–110.
Bulmer, M. (1984) Philanthropic foundations and the development of the social sciences in the early twentieth century: a reply to Donald Fisher,Sociology, 18,4, November, 572–9.
Bulmer, M. (1987) The rise of the academic as expert,Minerva 25(3), 362–74.
Bulmer, M. and Bulmer, J. (1981) Philanthropy and social science in the 1920's: Beardsley Ruml and the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial, 1922–1929,Minerva XIX, Autumn, 347–407.
Clark, R.W. (1972)A Biography of the Nuffield Foundation, Longman, London.
Coing, H. (1981) Remarks on the history of foundations and their role in the promotion of learning,Minerva XIX (2), Summer, 271–81.
Davis, A.F. (1967)Spearheads for Reform: The Social Settlements and the Progressive Movement 1890–1914, Oxford University Press, New York.
Du Bois, W.E.B. (1899)The Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
Fisher, D. (1993)Fundamental Development of the Social Sciences: Rockefeller Philanthropy and the United Stated Social Science Research Council, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Gleen J.M., Brandt, L. and Andrews, F.E. (1947)Russell Sage Foundation 1907–1946, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, two volumes.
Harris, J. (1977)William Beveridge: A Biography, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Hunter, R. (1901)Tenement Conditions in Chicago, City Homes Association, Chicago.
Hunter, R. (1904)Poverty, Macmillan, New York.
Karl, B.D. and Katz, S.N. (1981) The American private philanthropic foundation and the public sphere, 1890–1930,Minerva, XIX, 236–70.
Kellogg, P.U. (ed.) (1909–1914)The Pittsburgh Survey: Findings in Six Volumes, Charities Publication Committee, New York.
Kohler, R.E. (1978) A policy for the advancement of science: the Rockefeller Foundation 1924–1929,Minerva, XVI, Winter, 480–515.
Kohler, R.E. (1991)Partners in Science: Foundations and Natural Scientists 1900–1945, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
Lagemann, E.C. (1989)The Politics of Knowledge: The Carnegie Corporation, Philanthropy and Public Policy, Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, Connecticut.
Lindeman, E.C. (1936)Wealth and Culture: A Study of 100 Foundations During the Decade 1921–1930, Harcourt Brace, New York.
Meacham, S. (1987)Toynbee Hall and Social Reform 1880–1914: The Search for Community, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Mess, H.A. and Braithwaite, C. (1947) The great philanthropic trusts, in H.A. Mess et al. (eds)Voluntary Social Services Since 1918, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., London.
Myrdal, G. (1944)An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy, Harper and Row, New York.
President's Research Committee on Social Trends (1933)Recent Social Trends in the United States, McGraw Hill, New York.
Riis, J. (1890)How The Other Half Lives, C. Scribner's Sons, New York.
Rowntree, B.S. (1901)Poverty: A Study in Town Life, Macmillan, London.
Rowntree, J. (1904) The Founder's Memorandum, reprinted in L.E. Waddilove (1983)Private Philanthropy and Public Welfare: The Joseph Rowntree Memorial Trust, 1954–1979, Allen and Unwin, London.
Sklar, K.K. (1992) Hull-House Maps and Papers as women's work in the 1890s, in M. Bulmer, K. Bales and K.K. Sklar (eds),The Social Survey in Historical Perspective, 1880–1940, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Terrill, R. (1974)R.H. Tawney and his Times: Socialism as Fellowship, André Deutsch, London.
Weindling, P. (ed.) (1995)International Health Organisations and Movements, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wheatley, S.C. (1988)The Politics of Philanthropy: Abraham Flexner and Medical Education, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.
Woods, R. (ed.) (1899)The City Wilderness: A Settlement Study by Residents of the South End House, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Massachusetts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bulmer, M. Some observations on the history of large philanthropic foundations in Britain and the United States. Voluntas 6, 275–291 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354017
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354017