Abstract
Open-ended learning involves learning processes that are mediated by the unique intentions and purposes of individuals. Open-ended learning environments (OELEs) have been touted to support the building and evolving processes associated with self-directed learning. OELEs provide technological tools and resources for manipulating and exploring concepts. Whereas previous research has provided descriptions of OELE designs and case studies, little insight exists as to the processes used by learners to build and evolve their understanding. This paper describes a rationale for, and conceptual framework of, learning via open-ended environments.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ackermann, E. (1991). From decontextualized to situated knowledge: Revisiting Piaget's water-level experiment. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.),Constructionism (pp. 269–294). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Atkins, M., & Blissett, G. (1992). Interactive video and cognitive problem-solving skills.Educational Technology, 32(1), 44–50.
Belmont, J. (1989). Cognitive strategies and strategic learning.American Psychologist, 44(2), 142–148.
Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Research, 18(1), 32–41.
Carey, S. (1986). Cognitive science and science education.American Psychologist, 41(10), 1123–1130.
Cervone, D., & Wood, R. (1995). Goals, feedback, and the differential influence of self-regulatory processes on cognitively complex performance.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19(5), 519–545.
Chan, C., Burtis, P., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Constructive activity in learning from text.American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 97–118.
Chi M., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol.1, pp. 7–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Choi, J-I, & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design.Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53–69.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992). The Jasper Experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design.Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 65–80.
Cole, M. & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.),Distributed intelligence (pp. 1–46). New York: Cambridge.
Driver, R., & Scanlon, E. (1988). Conceptual change in science.Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning (5), pp. 25–36.
Edwards, L.D. (1995). The design and analysis of a mathematical microworld.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(1), 77–94.
Hannafin, M.J. (1992). Emerging technologies, ISD, and learning environments: Critical perspectives.Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 49–63.
Hannafin, M.J. (1993).The cognitive implications of computer-based learning environments. Report prepared for USAF AL/HRTC, United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Bolling AFB.
Hannafin, M.J., Hall, C., Land, S.M., & Hill, J.R. (1994). Learning in open-ended environments: Assumptions, methods, and implications.Educational Technology, 34(8), 48–55.
Hannafin, M.J., Hannafin, K.M., & Dalton, D.W. (1993). Feedback and emerging instructional technologies. In J. Dempsey & G. Sales (Eds.),Feedback and interactive instruction (pp. 263–286). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Software design as a learning environment. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.),Constructionism (pp. 41–84). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Hawkins, J. & Pea, R. (1987). Tools for bridging the cultures of everyday and scientific thinking.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 291–307.
Hill, J. (1995).Cognitive strategies and the use of a hypermedia information system: An exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Holland, J.H., Holyoak, Nisbett, R., & Thargard. (1986).Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johnson, D., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62.
Jonassen, D. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5–14.
Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Inhelder, B. (1975). “If you want to get ahead, get a theory.”Cognition, 3(3), 195–212.
Land, S.M. (1995).The process of developing theories-inaction with open-ended learning environments: An exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Language Development and Hypermedia Research Group. (1992). Bubble Dialogue: A new tool for instruction and assessment.Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(2), 59–67.
Lee, O., Eichinger, D., Anderson, C., Berkheimer, G., & Blakeslee, T. (1993). Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3), 249–270.
Lewis, E, Stern, J., & Linn, M. (1993). The effect of computer simulations on introductory thermodynamics understanding.Educational Technology, 33(1), 45–58.
Mayer, R.E. (1989). Models for understanding.Review of Educational Research, 59, 43–64.
McCaslin, M., & Good, T. (1992). Compliant cognition: The misalliance of management and instructional goals in current school reform.Educational Researcher, 21(3), 4–17.
Mestre, J., Dufresne, R., Gerace, W., & Hardiman, P. (1993). Promoting skilled problem-solving behavior among beginning physics students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3), 303–317.
Moore, P. (1995). Information problem solving: A wider view of library skills.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 1–31.
Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities.Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
Papert, S. (1993a).The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Papert, S. (1993b).Mindstorms (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Pea, R.D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.),Distributed intelligence (pp. 47–87). New York: Cambridge.
Perkins, D.N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (Ed.),Distributed intelligence (pp. 88–109). New York: Cambridge.
Perkins, D., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound?Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16–25.
Perkins, D., & Simmons, R. (1988). Patterns of misunderstanding: An integrative model for science, math, and programming.Review of Educational Research, 58, 303–326.
Piaget, J. (1970).The child's conception of movement and speed. New York: Ballantine.
Piaget, J. (1976).The grasp of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rieber, L.P. (1992). Computer-based microworlds: A bridge between constructivism and direct instruction.Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 93–106.
Rogers, C. (1961).On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Roth, W.M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The development of science process skills in authentic contexts.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 127–152.
Salomon, G. (1986). Information technologies: What you see is not (always) what you get.Educational Psychologist, 20, 207–216.
Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 620–627.
Salomon, G., Perkins, D., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies.Educational Researcher, April, 2–8.
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 51–68.
Schön, D.A. (1983).The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Shotsberger, P. (1996). Instructional uses of the World Wide Web.Educational Technology, 36(2), 47–50.
Spiro, R., Feltovich, P., Jacobson, M., & Coulson, R. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains.Educational Technology, 31(5), 24–33.
Steinberg, E. (1989). Cognition and learner control: A literature review, 1977–1988.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16, 117–121.
Tobin, K., & Dawson, G. (1992). Constraints to curriculum reform: Teachers and the myths of schooling.Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 64–92.
Twigger, D., Byard, M., Draper, S., Driver, R., Hartley, R., Hennessy, S., Mallen, C., Mohamed, R., O'Malley, C., O'Shea, T., Scanlon, E. (1991). The ‘Conceptual Change in Science’ project.Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 7, 144–155.
Vosniadou, S. (1992). Knowledge acquisition and conceptual change.Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41(4), 347–357.
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development.Review of Educational Research, 57(1), 51–67.
Vygotsky, L. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wilson, T., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations.Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 117–142.
Zimmerman, B. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This manuscript is based on the doctoral dissertation conducted by the first author at The Florida State University. The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Marcy P. Driscoll and Dr. Robert A. Reiser of the Instructional Systems Program, Florida State University and Dr. Richard K. Wagner of the Department of Psychology, Florida State University for their cooperation and support as committee members during the conduct of this study. The manuscript was prepared while the first author was working as a post-doctoral fellow at The University of Georgia's Learning and Performance Support Laboratory.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Land, S.M., Hannafin, M.J. A conceptual framework for the development of theories-in-action with open-ended learning environments. ETR&D 44, 37–53 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300424
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300424