Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of variations in the design and delivery of interactive multimedia (IMM) on the learning and attitudes of elementary education majors. A multivariate analysis of variance was conducted with three independent variables—small group or individualized format, inductive or deductive design of instruction, and match of learner style to instruction—and four dependent variables—content scores, observation skill scores, overall satisfaction, and attitude toward learner control of instruction. Scores on the observation skills evaluation were significantly higher when the student's learning style was matched with the design of instruction. Satisfaction and attitude outcomes were significantly different for format: students in the small group were more satisfied, while those using the individual learning station were more strongly agreed that they controlled the pace and sequence of their own instruction. Content scores were not significantly different. In the future, the use of interactive multimedia with various formats and designs may serve to meet the needs of students with differing learning styles and at different developmental levels.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abrams, A. (1986).Effectiveness of interactive video in teaching basic photography skills. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communication and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 267 754).
Ausubel, D. P. (1977). The facilitation of meaningful verbal learning in classrooms.Educational Psychologist, 12, 162–165.
Basion, P. M. (1985). Instructor-controlled training in a videodisc-based paramedical program.Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 13(2), 123–130.
Borich, G. D. (1988).Effective teaching methods. Columbus: Merrill.
Bosco, J. (1989). An analysis of evaluations of interactive video. InInteractive Video: The Educational Technology Anthology Series (pp. 130–140). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Bossert, S. T. (1988). Cooperative activities in the classroom. In E. Z. Rothkopf (Ed.),Review of Research in Education 15, 1988–1989 (pp. 225–252). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Carlson, H., & Falk, D. (1986).Learner analysis for videodisc instruction: Understanding groups videodisc series (Working Paper 86-1). Duluth, MN: College of Education and Human Service Professions Center for the Advancement of Learning Technologies.
Carlson, H., & Falk, D. (1989). Effective use of interactive videodisc instruction in understanding and implementing cooperative group learning with elementary pupils in social studies and social education.Theory and Research in Social Education, 17(3), 241–258.
Carlson H., & Falk, D. (1990–91). Effectiveness of interactive videodisc instructional programs.Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 19(2), 151–163.
Ellis, A. K. (1991).Teaching and learning elementary social studies. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Glasser, W. (1986).Control theory in the classroom. New York: Harper & Row.
Henderson, R. W., & Landesman, E. M. (1989). Interactive videodisc in pre-calculus.Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 17(2), 91–101.
Herbster, D. (1987).Integrating learning styles, critical thinking, and models of teaching in student teaching experience. Montana State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 303 462).
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1982).Joining together. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1985).Circles of learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Johnson, H. (1940).Teaching of history in elementary and secondary schools with applications to allied studies. New York: Macmillan.
Jones, E., & Van Valkenburgh, N. (1987).Innovation in staff development practice in Northern Virginia schools. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 301 534).
Kerka, S. (1989).Communication technologies in adult career and vocational education, ERIC digest No. 81. Columbus, GA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult Career and Vocational Education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 305 494).
King, P. M., Kitchener, K. S., Davison, M. L., Parker, D. A., & Wood, P. K. (1983). The justification of beliefs in young adults: A longitudinal study.Human Development, 26, 106–116.
Knefelkamp, L., & Cornfeld, J. (1983).Combining student stage and style in the design of learning environments: Using Holland typologies and Perry stages. Farmville, MD: University of Maryland, Center for the Applications of Developmental Instruction.
Kolb, D. A. (1976).Learning styles and disciplinary differences. Boston, MA: McBer and Company.
Kolb, D. A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In A. W. Chickering (Ed.),The modern American college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Moore, W. G. (1983).The measure of intellectual development: A brief review. Farmville, MD: University of Maryland, Center for the Applications of Developmental Instruction.
Perry, W. G. (1970).Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Peterson, L., Hofmeister, A. M., & Lubke, M. (1989). A videodisc approach to instructional productivity. InInteractive video: The educational technology anthology series (pp. 163–171). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (1989). In search of a happy medium in instructional technology research: Issues concerning external validity, media replications, and learner control.Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(1), 19–33.
Schmuck, R. A., & Schmuck, P. A. (1971).Group processes in the classroom. Dubuque, IA: William Brown.
Seels, B. (1989). The instructional design movement in educational technology,Educational Technology, 29, 11–15.
Slavin, F. (1988). Cooperative learning and student achievement,Educational Leadership, 35, 31–33.
Van Cleaf, D. (1988). Planning models: Two alternatives to Hunter.Educational Considerations, 15, 3–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carlson, H.L. Learning style and program design in interactive multimedia. ETR&D 39, 41–48 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296437
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296437