Abstract
The information criterion AIC was introduced to extend the method of maximum likelihood to the multimodel situation. It was obtained by relating the successful experience of the order determination of an autoregressive model to the determination of the number of factors in the maximum likelihood factor analysis. The use of the AIC criterion in the factor analysis is particularly interesting when it is viewed as the choice of a Bayesian model. This observation shows that the area of application of AIC can be much wider than the conventional i.i.d. type models on which the original derivation of the criterion was based. The observation of the Bayesian structure of the factor analysis model leads us to the handling of the problem of improper solution by introducing a natural prior distribution of factor loadings.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Akaike, H. (1969). Fitting autoregressive models for prediction.Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 21, 243–247.
Akaike, H. (1970). Statistical predictor identification.Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 22, 203–217.
Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Csaki (Eds.),2nd International Symposium on Information Theory (pp. 267–281). Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-19, 716–723.
Akaike, H. (1980). Likelihood and the Bayes procedure. In J. M. Bernardo, M. H. De Groot, D. V. Lindley, & A. F. M. Smith (Eds.),Bayesian Statistics (pp. 143–166). Valencia: University Press.
Akaike, H. (1985). Prediction and entropy. In A. C. Atkinson & S. E. Fienberg (Eds.),A Celebration of Statistics (pp. 1–24). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Bartholomew, D. J. (1981). Posterior analysis of the factor model.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 93–99.
Bozdogan, H., & Ramirez, D. E. (1987). An expert model selection approach to determine the “best” pattern structure in factor analysis models. Unpublished manuscript.
Harman, H. H. (1960).Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago: University Press.
Jennrich, R. I., & Robinson, S. M. (1969). A Newton-Raphson algorithm for maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 34, 111–123.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1967). Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 32, 443–482.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1978). Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices.Psychometrika, 43, 443–477.
Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. (1971).Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method, 2nd Edition. London: Butterworths.
Martin, J. K., & McDonald, R. P. (1975). Bayesian estimation in unrestricted factor analysis: a treatment for Heywood cases.Psychometrika, 40, 505–517.
Maxwell, A. E. (1961). Recent trends in factor analysis.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 124, 49–59.
Rao, C. R. (1955). Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 20, 93–111.
Tsumura, Y., Fukutomi, K., & Asoo, Y. (1968). On the unique convergence of iterative procedures in factor analysis.TRU Mathematics, 4, 52–59. (Science University of Tokyo).
Tsumura, Y., & Sato, M. (1981). On the convergence of iterative procedures in factor analysis.TRU Mathematics, 17, 159–168. (Science University of Tokyo).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author would like to express his thanks to Jim Ramsay, Yoshio Takane, Donald Ramirez and Hamparsum Bozdogan for helpful comments on the original version of the paper. Thanks are also due to Emiko Arahata for her help in computing.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akaike, H. Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 52, 317–332 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294359
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294359