Abstract
Conventional evaluation of quantitative mineral potential has focused on target selection at small scales. Mapping at small scales usually results in large-area targets, which may be suitable for grass-roots exploration or regional evaluation of potential. Unfortunately, the estimates in small-scale exploration are commonly associated with large uncertainties. Large-scale estimation is used for optimal in-fill drilling design and step-out drilling target selection. In-fill drilling helps to confirm ore-grade continuities and translate a portion of geological resources into minable reserves, whereas step-out target estimation is useful for finding new orebodies in the vicinity of known ore deposits. Both of these processes are necessary for mine development and production planning. A comprehensive methodology is proposed here, particularly for large-scale mineral exploration. The central information synthesizer is canonical or indicator favorability analysis. A case study is presented to demonstrate the methodology for large-scale target selection. The study involves a gold-mining district where step-out drilling targets are being sought to expand the resource base. Several drilling targets were delineated in the study region. Two of them were tested through surface sampling with positive results.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Agterberg, F.P., 1992, Combing indicator patterns in weights of evidence modeling for resource evaluation: Nonrenewable Resources, v. 1, p. 39–50.
Bonham-Carter, G.F., Agterberg, F.P., and Wright, D.F., 1988, Integration of geological datasets for gold exploration in Nova Scotia: Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, v. 54, p. 1585–1592.
Bonham-Carter, G.F., Reddy, R.K.T., and Galley, A.G., 1990, Preliminary results using a forward-chaining inference net with a GIS to map base-metal potential-application to Snow Lake greenstone belt, Manitoba, Canada: Proceedings of International Workshop on Statistical Prediction of Mineral Resources, Wuhan, China, Oct. 20–25, 1990, v. 1.
Chung, C.F., and Moon, W.M., 1991, Combination rules of spatial geoscience data for mineral exploration: Geoinformatics, v. 2, p. 159–169.
Moon, W.M., 1990, Integration of geophysical and geological data using evidential belief function: IEEE Transactions, Geoscience and Remote Sensing, v. 28, p. 711–720.
Pan, G.C., 1989, Concepts and methods of multivariate information synthesis for mineral resources estimation: Tucson, University of Arizona, Ph.D. dissertation, 302 p.
—, 1993a, Regionalized favorability theory for information synthesis in mineral exploration: Mathematical Geology, v. 25, p. 603–631.
—, 1993b, Indicator favorability theory for mineral potential mapping: Nonrenewable Resources, v. 2, p. 292–311.
Pan, G.C., and Harris, D.P., 1990, Three nonparametric techniques for optimal discretization of quantitative geological measurements: Mathematical Geology, v. 22 p. 220–232.
—, 1992, Estimating a favorability equation for the integration of geodata and selection of mineral exploration targets: Mathematical Geology, v. 24, p. 177–202.
Porterfield, D.B., 1993, Use of geodata integration techniques to target gold-silver mineralization at Twin Peaks, Owyhee County, Idaho: Tucson, University of Arizona, M.S. thesis, 85 p.
Shafer, G., 1986, Probability judgement in artificial intelligence,in Kanal, L.N., and Lemmer, J.F., eds, Uncertainty in artificial intelligence: New York, Elsevier, p. 127–135.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pan, G., Porterfield, B. Large-scale mineral potential estimation for blind precious metal ore bodies. Nat Resour Res 4, 187–207 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02259039
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02259039