Abstract
The Physicians' Reactions to Uncertainty (PRU) scales were developed to measure physicians' affective reactions to uncertainty. However, the structural (factor) model for the two PRU scales has not been cross validated on an independent sample of physicians. We surveyed 337 physicians in internal medicine at Indiana University to test the structural model for the PRU scales using confirmatory factor analysis and, if necessary, to refine the constructs and scales. The structural model of the original PRU scales did not fit the data (X2=559.26,p<.001) provided by the 265 (79%) respondents. Based on models suggested by 15 volunteers, we refined the constructs and scales. The four new scales are Anxiety Due to Uncertainty (five items,α=.85), Concern about Bad Outcomes (three items,α=.74), Reluctance to Disclose Uncertainty to Patients (five items,α=.76), and Reluctance to Disclose Mistakes to Physicians (two items,α=.75). The revised structural models have greater conceptual clarity, better fit to the data, and shorter scale measures than the original PRU model.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baldwin, B. (1989). A primer in the use and interpretation of structural equation models.Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 100–112.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–600.
Bollen, K. A. (1988).A new incremental fix index for general structural equation models. Paper presented at 1988 Southern Sociological Society Meeting, Nashville, TN.
Bollen, K. A. (1989).Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective.Psychological Bulletin 110, 305–314.
Bosk, C. L. (1979).Forgive and remember: Managing medical failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bosk, C. L. (1980). Occupational rituals in patient management.New England Journal of Medicine, 303, 71–76.
Bosk, C. L. (1986). Professional responsibility and medical error. In L. H. Aiken & D. Mechanic (Eds.),Applications of social science to clinical medicine and health policy (pp. 460–477). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Bowers, C. A. (1987).The promise of theory: Education and the politics of cultural change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Brook, R. H., Lohr, K. N., Chassin, M. R., Kosecoff, J., Fink, A., & Solomon, D. (1984). Geographic variations in the use of services: Do they have any clinical significance?Health Affairs, 3, 63–73.
Browne, M. W. (1974). Generalized least squares estimators in the analysis of covariance structures.South African Statistical Journal, 8, 1–24.
Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62–83.
Connell, F. A., Day, R. W., & LoGerfo, J. P. (1981). Hospitalization of Medicaid children: Analysis of small area variations in admission rates.American Journal of Public Health, 71, 606.
Davis, F. (1960). Uncertainty in medical prognosis: Clinical and functional.American Journal of Sociology, 66, 41–47.
Eddy, D. M. (1984). Variations in physician practice: The role of uncertainty.Health Affairs, 4, 74–89.
Eddy, D. M., & Billings, J. (1988). The quality of medical evidence: Implications for quality of care.Health Affairs, 7, 19–32.
Fox, R. C. (1957). Training for uncertainty. In R. Merton, G. C. Reader, & P. Kendall (Eds.),The student-physician: Introductory studies in the sociology of medical education (pp. 207–241). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gerrity, M. S., DeVellis, R. F., & Earp, J. A. (1990). Physicians reactions to uncertainty in patient care: A new measure and new insights.Medical Care, 28, 724–736.
Gerrity, M. S., Earp, J. A., DeVellis, R. F., Light, D. W. (1992). Uncertainty and professional work: Perceptions of physicians in clinical practice.American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1022–1051.
Goyert, G. L., Bottoms, S. F., Treadwell, M. C., & Nehra, P. C. (1989). The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.New England Journal of Medicine, 320, 706–709.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1986).LISERAL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood least square methods. Morresville, IN: Scientific Software Inc.
Katz, J. (1984). Why doctors don't disclose uncertainty.The Hastings Center Report, 14, 35–44.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991).Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Light, D. W. (1979). Uncertainty and control in professional training.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 20, 310–322.
Lusted, L. B. (1984). Uncertainty and indecision.Medical Decision Making, 4, 397–399.
Mizrahi, T. (1984). Managing medical mistakes: Ideology, insularity and accountability among internists-in-training.Social Science and Medicine, 19, 135–146.
Roos, N. P., & Roos, L. L. (1981). High and low surgical rates: Risk factors for area residents.American Journal of Public Health, 71, 591.
SAS Institute Inc. (1989).SAS/STAT user's guide (Version 6, 4th ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
SAS Institute Inc. (1991).The CALIS procedure: Analysis of covariance structures. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Tanaka, J. S. (1987). ‘How big is enough?’ Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables.Child Development, 58, 134–146.
Wennberg, J. (1986). Which rate is right?New England Journal of Medicine, 314, 310.
Wennberg, J. E., Barnes, B. A., & Zubkoff, M. (1982). Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand.Social Science and Medicine, 16, 811–824.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by National Research Service Award HS00032 from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerrity, M.S., White, K.P., DeVellis, R.F. et al. Physicians' Reactions to Uncertainty: Refining the constructs and scales. Motiv Emot 19, 175–191 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02250510
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02250510