Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ambulatory manometry in patients with colonic J-pouch and straight coloanal anastomoses

Randomized, controlled trial

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bowel function after ultralow anterior resection may be improved by a colonic J-pouch. The aim of this study was to compare the bowel function and ambulatory manometry in patients randomly assigned to straight coloanal anastomosis or colonic J-pouch. METHODS: Forty-seven consecutive patients underwent ultralow anterior resection for adenocarcinoma. The colonic J-pouch was constructed with 6-cm limbs. A bowel function questionnaire was administered at one year after surgery. Ambulatory manometry was performed before and at one year after surgery. RESULTS: Values are expressed below as mean and (standard error of the mean). Patients with colonic J-pouch were found to have less frequent stools (4.6 (0.3)vs. 7.1 (0.9) stools/day;P<0.05) and stool clustering (35vs. 63.2 percent;P<0.05) and were less unlikely to soil when passing flatus (85vs. 35.3 percent;P<0.05). The ambulatory anorectal pressure gradient was better preserved in the colonic J-pouch group (30.3 (3.7)vs. 18 (2.6) mmHg;P<0.05). Stool frequency was predicted by the mean rectal pressures (t=3.368;P=0.003). However, higher mean rectal pressures were tolerated by the colonic J-pouch for each daily bowel movement (6.7 (0.6)vs. 4.4 (0.5) mmHg/stool;P=0.008). Anal sampling episodes and slow wave activity were impaired postoperatively in both groups. The minimal anal pressures were lower in patients unable pass flatus without soiling (12.4 (5.3)vs. 26 (2.3) mmHg;P=0.004). Large contraction waves were not seen, and this may be related to the absence of severe defecation problems with 6-cm colonic J-pouches. CONCLUSIONS: A colonic J-pouch resulted in better bowel function and more favorable ambulatory manometric findings at one year of follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Finan PJ, Johnston D. Decrease in the anorectal pressure gradient after low anterior resection of the rectum: a study using continuous ambulatory manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1228–31.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Farouk R, Duthie GS, Lee PW, Monson JR. Endosonographic evidence of injury to the internal anal sphincter after low anterior resection: long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:888–91.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T,et al. Indications for colonic J-pouch reconstruction after anterior resection for rectal cancer: determining the optimum level of anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:558–63.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Joo JS, Latulippe JF, Alabaz O, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch: is the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch sustained? Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:740–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lazorthes F, Chiotasso P, Gamagami RA, Istvan G, Chevreau P. Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1997;84:1449–51.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hallböök O, Påhlman L, Krog M, Wexner SD, Sjödahl R. Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 1996;224:58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ho YH, Tan M, Seow-Choen F. Prospective randomized controlled study of clinical function and anorectal physiology after low anterior resection: comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomoses. Br J Surg 1996;83:978–80.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ortiz H, De Miguel M, Armendáriz P, Rodriquez J, Chocarro C. Coloanal anastomosis: are functional results better with a pouch? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:375–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chew SB, Tindal DS. Colonic J-pouch as a neorectum: functional assessment. Aust N Z J Surg 1997;67:607–10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Seow-Choen F, Goh H-S. Prospective randomized trial compared J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 1995;82:608–10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dehni N, Tiret E, Singland JD,et al. Long-term functional outcome after low anterior resection: comparison of low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:817–23.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hallböök O, Nyström P-O, Sjödahl R. Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:332–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ikeuchi H, Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Yamamura T, Utsunomiya J. Functional results after “high” coloanal anastomosis and “low” coloanal anastomosis with colonic J-pouch for rectal carcinoma. Surg Today 1997;27:702–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang JY, You YT, Chen HH, Chiang JM, Yeh CY, Tang R. Stapled colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis without a diverting colostomy for rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:30–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miller R, Lewis GT, Bartolo DC, Cervero F, Mortensen NJ. Sensory discrimination and dynamic activity in the anorectum: evidence using a new ambulatory technique. Br J Surg 1988;75:1003–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller R, Bartolo DC, Roe AM, Mortensen NJ. Assessment of microtransducers in anorectal manometry. Br J Surg 1988;75:40–3.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Romanos J, Stebbing JF, Smilgin Humphreys MM, Takeuchi N, Mortensen NJ. Ambulatory manometric examination in patients with a colonic J pouch and in normal controls. Br J Surg 1996;83:1774–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Griffen FD, Knight CD Sr, Knight CD Jr. Results of the double stapling procedure in pelvic surgery. World J Surg 1992;16:866–71.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McDonald PJ, Heald RJ. A survey of postoperative function after rectal anastomosis with circular stapling devices. Br J Surg 1983;70:727–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ho Y-H, Tan M. Ambulatory anorectal manometric findings in patients before and after haemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 1997;12:296–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lazorthes F, Gamagami R, Chiotasso P, Istvan G, Muhammad S. Prospective, randomized study comparing clinical results between small and large colonic J-pouch following coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1409–13.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hallböök O, Sjödahl R. Comparison between the colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis and healthy rectum: clinical and physiological function. Br J Surg 1997;84:1437–41.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dehni N, Schlegel RD, Cunningham C, Guiguet M, Tiret E, Parc R. Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leak rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1998;85:1114–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Ho, YH., Tan, M., Leong, A.F.P.K. et al. Ambulatory manometry in patients with colonic J-pouch and straight coloanal anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 793–799 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238016

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238016

Key words

Navigation