Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Prognostic significance of rectocele, intussusception, and abnormal perineal descent in biofeedback treatment for constipated patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The findings of paradoxical puborectalis contraction, rectocele, sigmoidocele, intussusception, and abnormal perineal descent often coexist in constipated patients, as noted by defecographic study. Moreover, some of these conditions are often found in asymptomatic patients. Biofeedback is the treatment of choice for constipated patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction; the main determinant of successful biofeedback is patient compliance. The significance of coexistent and highly prevalent variants, such as rectocele, intussusception, sigmoidocele, or abnormal perineal descent, on the success of biofeedback is unknown. This review was designed to assess whether these coexisting defecographic findings have any prognostic significance for the outcome of biofeedback. METHODS: From July 1988 to December 1996, 209 constipated patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction underwent biofeedback treatment after defecography. A total of 173 patients (120 females) who had more than one biofeedback session after defecography formed the study group. Defecographic findings included concomitant rectoceles, 40 (23 percent); evidence of circumferential intussusception, 17 (10 percent); sigmoidocele, 13 (8 percent); and abnormal perineal descent, 109 (63 percent). RESULTS: Whereas 65 patients failed to complete the course of biofeedback therapy, 108( 62.4 percent) patients completed the course of biofeedback and were discharged by the therapist. Within the completed group 59 (55 percent) improved, and 49 (45 percent) patients failed biofeedback therapy. In the improved group 14 (23.7 percent) had a rectocele, 5 (8.5 percent) had intussusception, 5( 8.5 percent) had a sigmoidocele, and 37 (62.7 percent) had abnormal perineal descent. In the failure group 9 (18.4 percent) had a rectocele, 5 (10.2 percent) had an intussusception, 2 (4.1 percent) had a sigmoidocele, and 31 (63.3 percent) had abnormal perineal descent (P=not significant). The success of biofeedback was then analyzed relative to the number of coexisting conditions. Specifically, the outcome in patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction alone and with one, two, and three other defecographic findings were compared. No statistically significant difference was found among these four groups. CONCLUSION: Although other defecographic findings frequently coexist with paradoxical puborectalis contraction, none of the concomitant findings adversely affected the outcome of biofeedback treatment. Therefore, biofeedback can be recommended to patients with coexistent defecographic findings, with expectation of success in over 50 percent of individuals who complete the course of therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wexner SD, Cheape JD, Jorge JM, Heymen S, Jagelman, DG. Prospective assessment of biofeedback for the treatment of paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:145–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Turnbull GK, Ritvo PG. Anal sphincter biofeedback relaxation treatment for women with intractable constipation symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:530–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dahl J, Lindquist BL, Tysk C, Leissner P, Philipson L, Jarnerot G. Behavioral medicine treatment in chronic constipation with paradoxical anal sphincter contraction. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:769–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fleshman JW, Dreznik Z, Meyer K, Fry RD, Carney R, Kodner IJ. Outpatient protocol for biofeedback therapy of pelvic floor outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kawimbe BM, Papachrysostomou M, Binnie NR, Clare N, Smith AN. Outlet obstruction constipation (anismus) managed by biofeedback. Gut 1991;32:1175–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bleijenberg G, Kuijpers HC. Treatment of the spastic pelvic floor syndrome with biofeedback. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:108–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Agachan F, Pfeifer J, Wexner SD. Defecography and proctography: results of 744 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:899–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C, Dolk A, Uden R, Ahlbäck SO, Holmström B. Defecography: results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1133–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siproudhis L, Ropert A, Lucas J,et al. Defecatory disorders, anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction: a polygram. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:102–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Murthy VK, Orkin BA, Smith LE, Glassman LM. Excellent outcome using selective criteria for rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:374–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van Dam JH, Schouten WR, Giani AZ, Huisman WM, Hop WC. The impact of anismus on the clinical outcome of rectocele repair. Int J Colorectal Dis 1996;11:238–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Dam JH, Giani AZ, Gosselink MJ,et al. Role of defecography in predicting clinical outcome of rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:201–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karlbom U, Graf W, Nilsson S, Påhlman L. Does surgical repair of a rectocele improve rectal emptying? Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1296–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Infantino A, Masin A, Melega E, Dodi G, Lise M. Does surgery resolve outlet obstruction from rectocele? Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10:97–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Johansson C, Ihre T, Holmström B, Nordstrom E, Dolk A, Brodén G. A combined electromyographic and cineradiologic investigation in patients with defecation disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:1009–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Johansson C, Nilsson BY, Holmström B, Dolk A, Mellgren A. Association between rectocele and paradoxical sphincter response. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:503–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Siproudhis L, Dautreme S, Ropert A,et al. Dyschezia and rectocele—a marriage of convenience? Physiologic evaluation of the rectocele in a group of 52 women complaining of difficulty in evacuation. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:1030–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jorge JM, Wexner SD, Ger GC, Salanga VD, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Cinedefecography and electromyography in the diagnosis of nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:668–76.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ger GC, Wexner SD, Jorge JM, Salanga VD. Anorectal manometry in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:816–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Blatchford GJ, Cali RL, Christensen MA. Surgical treatment of rectocele. In: Wexner SD, Bartolo DC, eds. Constipation: etiology, evaluation and management. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann Ltd, 1995;199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Madoff RD. Rectal prolapse and intussusception. In: Beck DE, Wexner SD, eds. Fundamentals of anorectal surgery, 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc, 1992; 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jorge JM, Yang YK, Wexner SD. Incidence and clinical significance of sigmoidoceles as determined by a new classification system. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1112–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gilliland R, Heymen S, Altomare DF, Park UC, Vickers D, Wexner SD. Outcome and predictors of success of biofeedback for constipation. Br J Surg 1997;84:1123–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Johansson C, Nilsson ByY, Mellgren A, Dolk A, Holmström B. Paradoxical sphincter reaction and associated colorectal disorder. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:89–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lubowski DZ, King DW Obstructed defecation: current status of pathophysiology and management. Aust N Z J Surg 1995;65:87–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Solana A, Roig JV, Villoslada C, Hinojosa J, Lledo S. Anorectal sensitivity in patients with obstructed defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1996;11:65–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jones PN, Lubowski DZ, Swash M, Henry MM. Is paradoxical contraction of puborectalis muscle of functional importance? Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:667–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gilliland R, Heymen JS, Altomare DF, Vickers D, Wexner SD. Biofeedback for intractable rectal pain: outcome and predictors of success. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:190–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Miller R, Duthie GS, Bartolo DC, Locke-Edmunds J, Mortensen NJ. Anismus in patients with normal and slow transit constipation. Br J Surg 1991;78:690–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Parks AG, Porter NH, Hardcastle J. The syndrome of descending perineum. Proc R Soc Med 1966;59:477–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 3000 West Cypress Creek Road, 33309, Fort Lauderdale, Florida

    Chi-Wai Lau M.D., Steve Heymen M.S., Omer Alabaz M.D., Augustine J. N. Iroatulam M.D. &  Steven D. Wexner M.D.

Authors
  1. Chi-Wai Lau M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steve Heymen M.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Omer Alabaz M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Augustine J. N. Iroatulam M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Steven D. Wexner M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Dr. Lau was a visiting surgeon from the Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong.

Supported in part by an educational grant from the Eleanor Naylor Dana charitable trust and from the Caporella family.

About this article

Cite this article

Lau, CW., Heymen, S., Alabaz, O. et al. Prognostic significance of rectocele, intussusception, and abnormal perineal descent in biofeedback treatment for constipated patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 478–482 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237190

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237190

Key words

Search

Navigation