Abstract
PURPOSE: Transanal stapled anastomosis has been associated with continence disturbances and reduced postoperative anal sphincter function. The aim of the present work was to study the effect of transanal stapling on anal sphincter morphology by endoanal ultrasound. METHODS: Thirty-nine consecutive patients undergoing stapled low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma were assessed. Each patient was assessed by endoluminal ultrasound before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: There were no preoperative internal and sphincter defects observed. Three female patients were observed to have preoperative evidence of external anal sphincter defects. After low anterior resection, seven patients were found to have internal anal sphincter defects, which persisted after the two-year follow-up. There were no additional external anal sphincter injuries. Three patients with internal anal sphincter injuries required the use of pads for poor bowel function. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 18 percent of patients who underwent stapled low anterior resection had long-term evidence of internal anal sphincter injury. The external sphincter does not appear to be affected by the procedure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kirwan WO, O'Riordan MG, Waldron R. Declining indications for abdomino-perineal resection. Br J Surg 1989;76:1061–3.
Lewis WG, Martin IG, Williamson ME,et al. Why do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:259–63.
Williamson ME, Lewis MG, Finan PJ, Miller AS, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D. Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:411–8.
Keighley MR, Matheson D. Functional results of rectal excision and endoanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1980;67:757–61.
Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Stephenson BM,et al. Role of the rectum in physiological and clinical results of coloanal and colorectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1992;79:1082–6.
Horgan PG, O'Connell PR, Shinkwin CA, Kirwan WO. Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 1989;76:783–6.
Farouk R, Drew PJ, Duthie GS, Lee PW, Monson JR. Evidence of internal anal sphincter disruption after transanal stapled anastomosis for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1996;83:1400.
Farouk R, Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. Recovery of the internal anal sphincter and continence after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1994;81:1065–8.
Kollmorgen CF, Meagher AP, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH, Martenson JA, Ilstrup DM. The long-term effect of adjuvant postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma on bowel function. Ann Surg 1994;220:676–82.
Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Finan PJ, Johnston D. Decrease in the anorectal pressure gradient after low anterior resection of the rectum: a study using continuous ambulatory manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1228–31.
Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Sagar PM, Stephenson BM, Finan PJ, Johnston J. Coordinated activity of the new “rectum” and anal sphincter after sphincter-saving resection of the rectum for colitis or carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1012–9.
Cavaliere F, Pemberton JH, Cosimelli M, Fazio VW, Beart RW Jr. Coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:807–12.
Miller AS, Lewis WG, Williamson ME, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D, Finan PJ. Factors that influence functional outcome after coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1995;82:1327–30.
Farouk R, Bartolo DC. The use of endoluminal ultrasound in the assessment of patients with faecal incontinence. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1994;39:312–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.
About this article
Cite this article
Farouk, R., Duthie, G.S., Lee, P.W.R. et al. Endosonographic evidence of injury to the internal anal sphincter after low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 41, 888–891 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235373
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235373