Abstract
PURPOSE: With the advent of transanal ultrasonography it has been possible to identify those incontinent patients without sphincter defects. The majority of these patients are now thought to have neurogenic fecal incontinence secondary to pudendal neuropathy. They have been found to have reduced anal sphincter pressures and increased pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies. The aim of this study was to determine whether in those incontinent patients who do not have a sphincter defect, prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency correlates with anal manometry, in particular maximum squeeze pressure. METHODS: Sixty-six incontinent patients were studied with transanal ultrasonography, anorectal manometry, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. Twenty-seven continent controls had anorectal manometry and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency measured. RESULTS: Maximum resting pressure and maximum squeeze pressure were significantly lower in the group of incontinent patients with bilateral prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (median maximum resting pressure = 26.5 mmHg; median maximum squeeze pressure = 60 mmHg) when compared with incontinent patients with normal bilateral pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies (median maximum resting pressure = 46 mmHg; median maximum squeeze pressure = 79 mmHg; maximum resting pressureP=0.004; and maximum squeeze pressureP=0.04). In incontinent patients with no sphincter defects no correlation between pudendal nerve terminal motor latency and maximum squeeze pressure was found (r=−0.109,P=0.48) and maximum squeeze pressure did not correlate with bilateral or unilateral prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (r=−0.148,P=0.56 andr=0.355,P=0.19 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence damage to the pelvic floor is more complex than damage to the pudendal nerve alone. Although increased pudendal nerve terminal motor latency may indicate that neuropathy is present, in patients with neuropathic fecal incontinence, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency does not correlate with maximum squeeze pressure. Normal pudendal nerve terminal motor latency does not exclude weakness of the pelvic floor.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vernava AM III, Longo WE, Daniel GL. Pudendal neuropathy and the importance of EMG evaluation of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:23–7.
Motson RW. Sphincter injuries: indications for, and results of, sphincter repair. Br J Surg 1985;72(Suppl):S19–21.
Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M, Setchell M. Risk factors in childbirth causing damage to the pelvic floor innervation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:20–4.
Kiff ES, Swash M. Slowed conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1984;71:614–6.
Laurberg S, Swash M, Henry MM. Delayed external sphincter repair for obstetric tear. Br J Surg 1988;75:786–8.
Falk PM, Blatchford GJ, Cali RL, Christensen MA, Thorson AG. Transanal ultrasound and manometry in the evaluation of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:468–72.
Rieger NA, Sarre RG, Saccone GT, Schoithe AC, Wattchow DA. Correlation of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency with results of anal manometry. Int J Colorectal Dis 1997;12:303–7.
Felt-Bersma RJ, Strijers RL, Janssen JJ, Visser SL, Meuwissen SG. The external anal sphincter: relationship between anal manometry and electromyography and its clinical relevance. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:112–6
Vaccaro CA, Cheong DM, Wexner SD,et al. Pudendal neuropathy in evacuatory disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:166–71.
Roig JV, Villoslada C, Lledó S,et al. Prevalence of pudendal neuropathy in fecal incontinence: results of a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:952–8
Varma JS, Smith AN. Anorectal profilometry with the microtransducer. Br J Surg 1984;71:867–9.
Ryhammer AM, Laurberg S, Hermann AP. Test-retest repeatability of anorectal physiology tests in healthy volunteers. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:287–92.
Neill ME, Parks AG, Swash M. Physiological studies of the pelvic floor in idiopathic faecal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1981;68:531–6.
Beersiek F, Parks AG, Swash M. Pathogenesis of anorectal incontinence. A histometric study of the anal sphincter musculature. J Neuro Sci 1979;42:111–27.
Swash M, Gray A, Lubowski DZ, Nicholls RJ. Ultrastructural changes in internal sphincter in neurogenic incontinence. Gut 1988;29:1692–8.
Rogers J, Henry MM, Misiewicz JJ. Combined sensory and motor deficit in primary faecal incontinence. Gut 1988;29:5–9.
Speakman CT, Kamm MA. Abnormal visceral autonomic innervation in neurogenic faecal incontinence. Gut 1993;34:215–21.
Emblem R, Dhaenens G, Stien R, Morkrid L, Aasen A, Bergan A. The importance of anal endosonography in the evaluation of idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:42–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Súilleabháin, C.B., Horgan, A.F., McEnroe, L. et al. The relationship of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency to squeeze pressure in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44, 666–671 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234563
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234563