Abstract
PURPOSE: Many patients with fecal incontinence demonstrate a functional deficit of the internal anal sphincter or the external sphincter muscles without any apparent structural defects. Few patients are amenable to repair or substitution of the sphincter. However, sacral nerve stimulation appears to offer a valid treatment option for fecal incontinence. The objectives of this study were: to evaluate the efficacy of temporary stimulation of the sacral nerve roots (percutaneous nerve evaluation) in patients with functional fecal incontinence; to determine the mechanisms of possible improvement; and to evaluate if temporary stimulation could be reproduced and maintained by implanting a permanent neurostimulation system. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with fecal incontinence, 18 females and 5 males, median age of 54.9 years (range 28–71), underwent a percutaneous nerve evaluation test. Eleven patients (47.8 percent) also had urinary disorders: urge incontinence (4), stress incontinence (3), and retention (4). Associated disorders included perineal and rectal pain (1), spastic paraparesis (1), and syringomyelia (1). All patients underwent a preliminary evaluation using stationary anal manovolumetry, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency measurements, and anal ultrasound. A percutaneous electrode for the stimulation of the sacral nerve roots was positioned at the level of the third sacral foramen (S3) in 20 patients and S2 in 2 patients (1 patient missing). Stimulation parameters used were: pulse width 210µsec, frequency 25 Hz, and average amplitude of 2.8 V (range 1–6). The electrode was left in place for a minimum of 7 days. Five patients were successively implanted with a permanent sacral electrode with a stimulation frequency of 16 to 18 Hz and amplitude of 1.1–4.9 V. RESULTS: Seventeen of the 19 patients (89.4 percent) who completed the minimum percutaneous nerve evaluation period of 7 days (median 10.7 (range 7–30)), had a reduction of liquid or solid stool incontinence by more than 50 percent, and fourteen (73.6 percent) were completely continent for stool. The most important changes revealed by manovolumetry were an increase in resting pressure (P<0.001) and voluntary contraction (P=0.041), reduction of initial pressure for first sensation (P=0.049) and urge to defecate (P=0.002), and a reduction of the rectal volume for urge sensation (P=0.006). The percutaneous nerve evaluation results were reproduced at a median follow-up of 19.2 months (range 5 to 37) in the 5 patients who received a permanent implant. CONCLUSIONS: Temporary stimulation of the sacral roots (percutaneous nerve evaluation) can be of help in those patients with fecal incontinence, and the results are reproduced with permanent implantation. The positive effect on continence seems to be derived from not only the direct efferent stimulation on the pelvic floor and the striated sphincter muscle, but also from modulating afferent stimulation of the autonomous neural system, inhibition of the rectal detrusor, activation of the internal anal sphincter, and modulation of sacral reflexes that regulate rectal sensitivity and motility.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Parks AG, Porter NH, Melzak J. Experimental study of the reflex mechanism controlling the muscles of the pelvic floor. Dis Colon Rectum 1962;5:407–14.
Baeten C, Konsten J, Spaans F, Soeters PB. Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 1991;338:1163–5.
Pickrell KL, Broatbend R, Masters FW, Metzger JT. Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle: a report of four cases in children. A Surg 1952;135:853–62.
Christiansen J, Lorentzen M. Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence: report of five cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:432–6.
Lehur PA, Michot F, Denis P,et al. Results of artificial sphincter in severe anal incontinence: report of 14 consecutive implantations. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1352–5.
Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM,et al. Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1600–5.
Orrom WJ, Miller R, Cornes H, Duthie G, Mortensen NJ, Bartolo DC. Comparison of anterior sphincteroplasty and postanal repair in the treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34:305–10.
Bradley WE, Timm GW, Chou SN. A decade of experience with electronic stimulation of the micturition reflex. Urol Int 1971;26:283–302.
Held T, Agrawal G, Kantrowitz A. Studies in stimulation of the bladder and its motor nerves. Surgery 1966;60:848–56.
Jonas U, Jones LW, Tanagho EA. Spinal cord versus detrusor stimulation. A comparative study in six acute dogs. Invest Urol 1975;13:171–4.
Ingersoll EH, Jones LL, Hegre ES. Effect on urinary bladder of unilateral stimulation of pelvic nerves in the dog. Am J Physiol 1957;189:167–71.
Holmquist B. Electromicturation by pelvic nerve stimulation in dogs. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 1968;2:1–27.
Heine JP, Schmidt RA, Tanagho EA. Intraspinal sacral root stimulation for controlled micturition. Invest Urol 1977;15:78–82.
Schmidt RA, Bruschini H, Tanagho EA. Urinary bladder and sphincter responses to stimulation of dorsal and ventral sacral roots. Invest Urol 1979;16:300–4.
Tanagho EA, Schmidt RA. Bladder pacemaker: scientific basis and clinical future. Urology 1982;20:614–9.
Åkerval S, Fasth S, Nordgres S, Öresland T, Hultén L. Manovolumetry: a new method for investigation of anorectal function. Gut 1988;29:614–23.
Ohlsson BL, Fall M, Frankenberg-Sommar S. Effects of external and direct pudendal nerve maximal electrical stimulation in the treatment of the uninhibited overactive bladder. Br J Urol 1989;64:374–80.
Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall FP. Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 1995;346:1124–7.
EA Tanagho. Concepts of neuromodulation. Neurour Urodyn 1993;12:487–8
Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Turner IC, Nicholls RJ, Woloszko J. Effects of short term sacral nerve stimulation on anal and rectal function in patients with anal incontinence. Gut 1999;44:407–12.
Malouf A, Vaizey C, Nicholls R, Kamm M. Results of permanent sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence [meeting abstract]. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:A12.
Speakman CT, Kamm MA. The internal anal sphincter—new insights into fecal incontinence. Gut 1991;32:345–6.
Swash M. Pathogenesis of idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1983;9:22–4.
Schultz-Lampel D, Jiang C, Lindstrom S, Thuroff JW. Experimental results on mechanisms of action of electrical neuromodulation in chronic urinary retention. World J Urol 1998;16:301–4.
Tanagho EA, Schmidt RA. Electrical stimulation in the clinical management of the neurogenic bladder. J Urol 1988;140:1331–9.
Matzel KE, Schmidt RA, Tanagho EA. Neuroanatomy of the striated muscular anal continence mechanism. Implications for the use of neurostimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:666–73.
Percy JP, Neill ME, Parks AG. Electrophysiological study of motor nerve supply of pelvic floor. Lancet 1981;1:146–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Ganio, E., Luc, A.R., Clerico, G. et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44, 619–629 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234555
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234555