Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this article was to investigate the safety, outcome, length of stay, and cost of hospital admission in patients with Crohn's disease who underwent laparoscopy compared with open surgery. METHODS: Among 51 consecutive patients with inflammatory bowel disease (1996–2000), 46 with Crohn's disease were included in this nonrandomized prospective study. Of these, 20 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery and 26 underwent open surgery. Data collected included the following information: age, gender, body mass index, diagnosis, duration of disease, preoperative medical treatment, previous abdominal surgery, present indication for surgery, and procedure performed (comparability measures), as well as conversion to open surgery, operating time, time to resolution of ileus, morbidity, duration of hospital stay, and cost of hospital admission (outcome measures). RESULTS: There was no significant difference with respect to comparability measures between the laparoscopic and the open-surgery groups. There was no mortality. There was no intraoperative complication in either group and no conversion in the laparoscopic group. Operating time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (302 minutes)vs. the open group (244.7 minutes) (P<0.05), but this difference disappeared when data were adjusted for the extra time required to perform the laparoscopic hand-sewn anastomoses (288.2 minutesvs. 244.7 minutes). Bowel function returned more quickly in the laparoscopic groupvs. the open group in terms of passage of flatus (3.7vs. 4.7 days) (P<0.05) and resumption of oral intake (4.2vs. 6.3 day) (P<0.01). There were significantly fewer postoperative complications in the laparoscopic group (9.5 percent)vs. the open group (18.5 percent) (P<0.05); the length of stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (8.3 days)vs. the open group (13.2 days) (P<0.01); and the cost of hospital admission was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group ($6106, United States dollars)vs. the open group ($9829, United States dollars) (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: There is a reduction in the postoperative ileus, length of stay, cost of hospital admission, and postoperative complication rate in the laparoscopic group. Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease is safe, and it is potentially more cost-effective than traditional open surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen HH, Wexner SD, Weiss EG,et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for benign colorectal disease is associated with a significant reduction in disability as compared with laparotomy. Surg Endosc 1998;12:1397–400.
Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mackeigan JM, Mazier WP. Open colectomy versus laparoscopic colectomy: are there differences? Am Surg 1993;59:549–54.
Alabaz O, Iroatulam AJ, Nessim A, Weiss E, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted and conventional ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. Eur J Surg 2000;166:213–7.
Hildebrandt U, Kesseler K, Pistorious G,et al. Granulocyte elastase and systemic cytokine response after laparoscopic-assisted and open resections in Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1480–6.
Fingerhut A, Hay JM. Single-dose ceftriaxone, ornidazole, and povidone-iodine enema in elective left colectomy. A randomized multicenter controlled trial. The French Association for Surgical Research. Arch Surg 1993;128:228–32.
Marcello PW, Milsom JW, Wong SK,et al. Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:604–8.
Ludwig KA, Milsom JW, Church JM, Fazio VW. Preliminary experience with laparoscopic intestinal surgery for Crohn's disease. Am J Surg 1996;171:52–5.
Milsom JW, Lavery IC, Bohm B, Fazio VW. Laparoscopically assisted ileocolectomy in Crohn's disease. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993;3:77–80.
Reissman P, Salky BA, Pfeifer J, Edye M, Jagelman DG, Wexner SD. Laparoscopic surgery in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Surg 1996;171:47–50.
Sardinha TC, Wexner SD. Laparoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: pros and cons. World J Surg 1998;22:370–4.
Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM. Safety and advantages of laparoscopicvs. open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:326–32.
Wu JS, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fry RD, Read TE, Fleshman JW. Laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection in patients with Crohn's disease: are abscesses, phlegmons, or recurrent disease contraindications? Surgery 1997;122:682–9.
Watanabe M, Ohgami M, Teramoto T, Hibi T, Kitajima M. Laparoscopic ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease associated with intestinal stenosis and ileorectal fistula. Jpn J Surg 1999;29:446–8.
Canin-Endres J, Saly B Gattorno F, Edye M. Laparoscopically assisted intestinal resection in 88 patients with Crohn's disease. Surg Endosc 1999;13:595–9.
Bernstein MA, Dawson JW, Reissman P, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Is complete laparoscopic colectomy superior to laparoscopic assisted colectomy? Am Surg 1996;62:507–11.
Singh K, Prasad A, Saunders JH, Foley RJ. Laparoscopy in the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1998;8:39–46.
Gambiez L, Denimal F, Jafari-Manjili M, Kosydar P, Fromont G, Quandalle P. Laparoscopic ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease. Ann Chir 1999;53:1039–43.
Msika S, Deroide G, Kianmanesh R,et al. Harmonic scalpel in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:432–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Msika, S., Iannelli, A., Deroide, G. et al. Can laparoscopy reduce hospital stay in the treatment of crohn's disease?. Dis Colon Rectum 44, 1661–1666 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234387
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234387