Abstract
Formation processes are generally considered as a negative factor for behavioral inference in archaeology. The concept of formation processes, however, can potentially be far more useful for behavioral inference in archaeology than simply identifying spurious variability in the archaeological record. Physical traces left by cultural formation processes convey a certain kind of behavioral information which may not be otherwise available. Variables related to site occupation, such as the occupation span, the number of occupation episodes, and the location of activities, can be inferred from characteristics of refuse deposits, or “refuse structure.”
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References cited
Ambler, R. (1987).AZ D:11:9, a Locus for Pueblo II Grimy Activities on Central Black Mesa, Northeastern Arizona, Northern Arizona University, Archaeological Report 674, Flagstaff.
Archer, G. H. (1990).Artifact Size and Frequency in the Analysis of Hohokam Habitation Refuse Using a High Resolution Method, M.A. thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Arnold, P. J., III (1990). The organization of refuse disposal and ceramic production within contemporary Mexican houselots.American Anthropologist 92: 915–932.
Bartram, L. E., Kroll, E. M., and Bunn, H. T. (1991). Variability in camp structure and bone food refuse patterning at Kua San hunter-gather camps. In Kroll, E. M., and Price, T. D. (eds.),The Interpretation of Archaeological Spatial Patterning, Plenum, New York, pp. 77–148.
Binford, L. R. (1977). Forty-seven trips: A case study in the character of archaeological formation process. In Wright, R. V. S. (ed.),Stone Tools as Cultural Markers, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra, pp. 24–36.
Binford, L. R. (1978a). Dimensional analysis of behavior and site structure: Learning from an Eskimo hunting stand.American Antiquity 43: 330–361.
Binford, L. R. (1978b).Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology, Academic Press, New York.
Binford, L. R. (1983a).Working at Archaeology, Academic Press, New York.
Binford, L. R. (1983b).In Pursuit of the Past, Thames and Hudson, London.
Binford, L. R. (1986). An Alyawara day: Making men's knives and beyond.American Antiquity 51: 547–562.
Binford, L. R. (1987). Researching ambiguity: Frames of reference and site structure. In Kent, S. (ed.),Method and Theory for Activity Area Research, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 449–512.
Binford, L. R. (1989).Debating Archaeology, Academic Press, New York.
Binford, L. R., and O'Connell, J. F. (1984). An Alyaware day: The stone quarry.Journal of Anthropological Research 40: 406–432.
Bradley, R., and Fulford, M. (1980). Sherd size in the analysis of occupation debris.Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology 17, 85–94 (University of London).
Brown, P. E., and Stone, C. L. (eds.) (1982).Granite Reef: A Study in Desert Archaeology. Anthropological Papers 28 and Anthropological Field Studies 3, Arizona State University, Tempe.
Clark, J. D., and Kurashina, H. (1981). A study of the work of a modern tanner in Ethiopia and its relevance for archaeological interpretation. In Gould, R., and Schiffer, M. (eds.),Modern Material Culture: The Archaeology of Us, Academic Press, New York, pp. 303–321.
Clark, J. E. (1991). Flintknapping and debitage disposal among the Lacandon Maya of Chiapas, Mexico. In Staski, E., and Sutro, L. (eds.),The Ethnoarchaeology of Refuse Disposal, Arizona State University, Anthropological Research Paper 42, Tempe, pp. 63–78.
Deal, M. (1983).Pottery Ethnoarchaeology Among the Tzeltal Maya, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University. Burnaby, British Columbia.
Deal, M. (1985). Household pottery disposal in the Maya Highlands: An ethnoarchaeological interpretation.Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4: 243–291.
Deal, M., and Hayden, B. (1987). The persistence of pre-Columbian lithic technology in the form of glass working. In Hayden, B. (ed.),Lithic Studies Among the Contemporary Highland Maya, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 235–331.
DeBoer, W. R., and Lathrap, D. W. (1979). The making and breaking of Shipibo-Conibo ceramics. In Kramer, C. (ed.),Ethnoarchaeology: Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 102–138.
Fischer, A. R. (1985). Winklebury hillfort: A study of artefact distributions from subsoil features.Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 51: 167–180.
Fisher, J. W., and Strickland, H. C. (1989). Ethnoarchaeology among the Efe Pygmies, Zaire: Spatial organization of campsites.American Journal of Physical Anthropology 78: 473–484.
Fladmark, K. R. (1982). Microdebitage analysis: Initial considerations.Journal of Archaeological Science 9: 205–220.
Gallagher, J. P. (1977). Contemporary stone tools in Ethiopia: Implications for archaeology.Journal of Field Archaeology 4: 407–414.
Gifford, D. P. (1978). Ethnoarchaeological observations of natural processes affecting cultural materials. In Gould, R. A. (ed.),Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 77–102.
Gould, R. A. (1980).Living Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Hally, D. J. (1983). The interpretive potential of pottery from domestic contexts.Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 8: 163–196.
Hayden, B., and Cannon, A. (1983). Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands.Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2: 117–163.
Henderson, T. K. (1987). Ceramics, dates, and the growth of the Marana Community. In Rice, G. (ed.),Studies in the Hohokam Community of Marana, Arizona State University, Anthropological Field Studies 15, Tempe, pp. 49–78.
Hitchcock, R. K. (1987). Sedentism and site structure: Organization changes in Kalahari Basarwa residential locations. In Kent, S. (ed.),Method and Theory for Activity Area Research: An Ethnoarchaeological Approach, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 374–423.
Hull, K. L. (1987). Identification of cultural site formation processes through microdebitage analysis.American Antiquity 52: 772–783.
Kamp, K. A. (1991). Waste disposal in a Syrian village. In Staski, E., and Sutro, L. (eds.),The Ethnoarchaeology of Refuse Disposal, Anthropological Research Papers 42, Arizona State University, Tempe, pp. 23–31.
Kent, S. (1984).Analyzing Activity Areas: An Ethnoarchaeological Study of the Use of Space, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
Kent, S. (ed.) (1987).Method and Theory for Activity Area Research, Columbia University Press, New York.
Kent, S. (1991). The relationship between mobility strategies and site structure. In Kroll, E. M., and Price, T. D. (eds.),The Interpretation of Archaeological Spatial Patterning, Plenum, New York, pp. 33–59.
Kirkby, A., and Kirkby, M. (1976). Geomorphic processes and the surface survey of archaeological sites in semi-arid areas. In Davidson, D., and Schackley, M. (eds.),Geoarchaeology, Duckworth, London, pp. 229–253.
Kroll, E. M., and Price, T. D. (eds.) (1991).The Interpretation of Archaeological Spatial Patterning, Plenum, New York.
McKellar, J. A. (1983). Correlates and the explanation of distributions.Atlatl, Occasional Papers 4, Anthropology Club, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Meehan, B. (1982).Shell Bed to Shell Midden, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.
Metcalfe, D., and Heath, K. M. (1990). Micro-refuse and site structure: The hearths and floors of the Heartbreak Hotel.American Antiquity 55(4): 781–796.
Murray, P. (1980). Discard location: The ethnographic data.American Antiquity 45: 490–502.
Nielsen, A. E. (1991). Trampling the archaeological record: An experimental study.American Antiquity 56: 483–503.
O'Connell, J. F. (1987). Alyawara site structure and its archaeological implications.American Antiquity 52: 74–108.
O'Connell, J. F., Hawkes, K., and Jones, N. B. (1991). Distribution of refuse-producing activities at Hadza residential base camps: Implications for analyses of archaeological site structure. In Kroll, E. M., and Price, T. D. (eds.),The Interpretation of Archaeological Spatial Patterning, Plenum, New York, pp. 61–76.
Pastron, A. G. (1974). Preliminary ethnoarchaeological investigations among the Tarahumara. In Donnan, C. B., and Clewlow, C. W., Jr. (eds.),Ethnoarchaeology, Monograph of Institute of Archaeology 4, University of California, Los Angeles.
Rogers, M. J. (1936).Yuman Pottery Making, San Diego Museum Papers 2, San Diego.
Rogers, M. J. (1945). An outline of Yuman prehistory.Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 1: 167–198.
Rogers, M. J. (1966).Ancient Hunters of the Far West. Union-Tribune, San Diego.
Rosen, A. M. (1986).Cities of Clay: The Geoarchaeology of Tells, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Rosen, A. M. (1989). Ancient town and city sites: A view from the microscope.American Antiquity 54: 564–578.
Schiffer, M. B. (1972). Archaeological context and systemic context.American Antiquity 37: 156–165.
Schiffer, M. B. (1976).Behavioral Archeology, Academic Press, New York.
Schiffer, M. B. (1987).Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
Simms, S. R. (1988). The archaeological structure of a Bedouin camp.Journal of Archaeological Science 15: 197–211.
Simms, S. R., and Heath, K. M. (1990). Site structure of the Orbit Inn: an application of ethnoarchaeology.American Antiquity 55: 797–813.
South, S. (1977).Method and Theory in Historical Archaeology, Academic Press, New York.
Stark, B. (1984). An ethnoarchaeological study of a Mexican pottery industry.Journal of New World Archaeology VI(2): 4–14.
Stevenson, M. G. (1982). Toward an understanding of site abandonment behavior: Evidence from historic mining camps in the southwest Yukon.Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 237–265.
Stevenson, M. G. (1985). The formation processes of artifact assemblages at workshop/habitation sites: Models from Peace Point in northern Alberta.American Antiquity 50: 63–81.
Sullivan, A. P., III. (1980).Prehistoric Settlement Variability in the Grasshopper Area, East-Central Arizona, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Tani, M. (1991).Extending the Methodological Potential for Archaeological Interpretations: A Small Site Analysis, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Tani, M. (1994). Why should more pots break in larger households? Mechanisms underlying population estimates from ceramics. In Longacre, W. A., and Skibo, J. (eds.),Kalinga Ethnoarchaeology, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 51–70.
Vance, E. D. (1987). Microdebitage and archaeological activity analysis.Archaeology 40(4): 58–59.
Wilcox, D. R. (1987). New models of social structure at the Palo Parado Site. In Doyel, D. E. (ed.),The Hohokam Village: Site Structure and Organization, Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, pp. 223–248.
Wilk, R., and Schiffer, M. B. (1979). The archaeology of vacant lots in Tucson, Arizona.American Antiquity 44: 530–536.
Yellen, J. (1977).Archaeological Approaches to the Present, Academic Press, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tani, M. Beyond the identification of formation processes: Behavioral inference based on traces left by cultural formation processes. J Archaeol Method Theory 2, 231–252 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229008
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229008