Abstract
Peer influence is regarded as one of the strongest determinants of juvenile delinquency and particularly adolescent substance use. A commonly held view is that social pressure from friends to use drugs and alcohol is a major contributor to substance use. Yet the notion of peer pressure, implied by the association between peer-group associations and drug behavior, is seldom tested empirically. As a crucial test of the group pressure model, this research examines the role of peer pressure in mediating the effect of differential association on individual use. Moreover, few studies examine the nature of the relationship between peers and substance use as it relates to the processes leading toand from use. Drawing on differential association and social learning theories, our research specifies the social processes (socialization, group pressure, social selection, and rationalization) which dictate particular causal pathways leading to and from substance use and then estimates the reciprocal influences among differential association, social pressure from peers, attitudes favorable toward substance use, and individual use. Using the 1977–1979 National Youth Survey panel data, we estimate a covariance structural equation model allowing for correlated measurement error. In the cross-sectional analyses, we find no main effects of overt peer pressure on substance use. Estimation of the reciprocal effects model also reveals that overt peer pressure does not significantly influence substance use and does not mediate the effect of differential association. Instead, the influences of socialization, social selection, and rationalization play significant roles in understanding substance use.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Agnew, R. (1991a). The interactive effects of peer variables on delinquency.Criminology 29: 47–72.
Agnew, R. (1991b). A longitudinal test of social control theory and delinquency.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 28: 126–156.
Akers, R. L. (1977).Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach, 2nd ed., Wadsworth, Belmont.
Akers, R. L. (1985).Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach, 3rd ed., Wadsworth, Belmont.
Akers, R. L. (1992).Drugs, Alcohol, and Society: Social Structure, Process and Policy, Wadsworth, Belmont.
Akers, R. L. (1994).Criminological Theories: Introduction and Evaluation, Roxbury, Los Angeles.
Akers, R. L., and Cochran, J. K. (1985). Adolescent marijuana use: A test of three theories of deviant behavior.Deviant Behav. 6: 323–346.
Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., and Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory.Am. Soc. Rev. 44: 636–655.
AMA Board of Trustees (1991). Drug abuse in the United States: Strategies for prevention.JAMA 265: 2102–2107.
Bandura, A. (1977).Social Learning Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Briar, S., and Piliavin, I. (1965). Delinquency, situational inducements, and commitment to conformity.Soc. Problems 13: 35–45.
Brown, B. B., Clasen, D. R., and Eicher, S. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents.Dev. Psychol. 22: 521–30.
Burgess, R., and Akers, R. (1968). Differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior.Soc. Problems 14: 128–147.
Burkett, S. R. and Warren, B. O. (1987). Religiosity, peer associations, and adolescent marijuana use: A panel study of underlying causal structures.Criminology 25: 109–131.
Cohen, L. E., and Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 588–608.
Cohen, L. E., Kluegel, J. R., and Land, K. C. (1981). Exposition and test of a formal theory.Am. Sociol. Rev. 46: 505–524.
Cressey, D. R. (1953).Other People's Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement, Free Press, Glencoe, Il.
Cullen, F. T. (1983).Rethinking Crime and Deviance Theory, Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, NJ.
Dielman, T. E., Shope, J. T., Butchart, A. T., Campanelli, P. C., and Caspar, R. A. (1989). A covariance structure model test of antecedents of adolescent alcohol misuse and a prevention effort.J. Drug Educ. 19: 337–361.
Dielman, T. E., Butchart, A. T., Shope, J. T., and Miller, M. (1991). Environmental correlates of adolescent substance use and misuse: Implications for prevention programs.Int. J. Addict. 25: 855–880.
Elliott, D. S. (1976).National Youth Survey [United States]: Wave I, 1976, InterUniversity Corsortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
Elliott, D. S., and Menard, S. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior: Temporal and developmental patterns. In Hawkins, J. D. (ed.),Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 28–67.
Elliott, D. S., Knowles, B. A., and Canter, R. J. (1981).The Epidemiology of Delinquent Behavior and Drug Use Among American Adolescents. Vol. 1. The National Youth Survey Project Report No. 14, Behavioral Research Institute, Boulder, CO.
Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., and Ageton, S. S. (1985).Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Flannery, D. J., Vazsonyi, A. T., Torquati, J., and Fridrich, A. (1994). Ethnic and gender differences in risk for early adolescent substance use.J. Youth Adolesc. 23: 195–213.
Fromme, K. (1983). Peer influence on social drinking.Bull. Soc. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 2: 50–53.
Gibbons, D. C. (1971). Observations on the study of crime causation.Am. J. Soc. 77: 262–278.
Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., and Pugh, M. D. (1986). Friendships and delinquency.Am. J. Sociol. 91: 1170–1201.
Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., and DeMaris, A. (1993). The family and peer relations of black adolescents.J. Marriage Fam. 55: 277–287.
Glueck, S., and Glueck, E. (1950).Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency, The Commonwealth Fund, New York.
Gonet, M. M. (1994).Counseling the Adolescent Substance User: School-Based Intervention and Prevention, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Gottfredson, M., and Hirschi, T. (1987). The methodological adequacy of longitudinal research on crime.Criminology 25: 581–614.
Gottfredson, M., and Hirschi, T. (1990).A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Hayduk, L. (1987).Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Hirschi, T. (1969).Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Huizinga, D. (1978). Description of the national youth sample. Project Report Number 2. HEW Grant Number MH27552.The Dynamics of Delinquent Behavior: A National Survey, Behavioral Research Institute, Boulder, CO.
Jackson, D. F., Tittle, C. R., and Burke, M. J. (1986). Offense-specific models of the differential association process.Soc. Problems 33: 335–356.
Jacquith, S. M. (1981). Adolescent marijuana and alcohol use: An empirical test of differential association theory.Criminology 19: 271–280.
Jensen, G. F. (1972). Parents, peers, and delinquent action: A test of the differential association perspective.Am. J. Sociol. 78: 562–575.
Johnson, R. E. (1979).Juvenile Delinquency and Its Origins: An Integrated Theoretical Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Johnson, R. E., Marcos, A. C., and Bahr, S. J. (1987). The role of peers in the complex etiology of adolescent drug use.Criminology 25: 323–340.
Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., and Bachman, J. G. (1995).Monitoring the Future Study [press release 13], National Institute on Drug Abuse, Washington, DC.
Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D. (1989).LISREL VII: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Squares Methods, 4th ed., Scientific Software, Mooresville, IN.
Kandel, D. B., Kessler, R. C., and Margulies, R. Z. (1978). Antecedents of adolescent initiation into stages of drug use: A developmental analysis.J. Youth Adolesc. 7: 13–40.
Kercher, K. (1988). Criminology. In Borgatta, E. F., and Cook, K. S. (eds.),The Future of Sociology, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 294–316.
Krohn, M. D., Akers, R. L., Radosevich, M. J., and Lanza-Kaduce, L. (1982). Norm qualities and adolescent drinking and drug behavior.J. Drug Issues 12: 343–359.
Krohn, M. D., Skinner, W. F., Massey, J. L., and Akers, R. L. (1983). Social learning theory and adolescent cigarette smoking: A longitudinal study.Soc. Problems 32: 455–471.
Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., and Akers, R. L. (1984). Community context and theories of deviant behavior: An examination of social learning and social bonding theories.Sociol. Q. 25: 353–371.
Liska, A. E. (1969). Interpreting the causal structure of differential association theory.Soc. Problems 16: 485–492.
Liska, A. E. (1973). Causal structures underlying the relationship between delinquent involvement and peers.Soc. Sociol. Res. 58: 23–36.
Liska, A. E. (1978). Deviant involvement, associations and attitudes: Specifying the underlying causal structures.Soc Sociol. Res. 63: 73–88.
Liska, A. E. (1987).Perspectives on Deviance, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Liska, A. E., and Reed, M. D. (1985). Ties to conventional institutions and delinquency: Estimating reciprocal effects.Am. Sociol. Rev. 50: 547–560.
Lofland, J. (1969).Deviance and Identity, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
MacDonald, D. I. (1989).Drugs, Drinking and Adolescents, 2nd ed. Year Book Medical, Chicago.
Mann, P. (1980). Marijuana: The myth of harmlessness goes up in smoke.Sat. Eve. Post July/Aug. 32–43.
Marcos, A. C., Bahr, S. J., and Johnson, R. E. (1986). Test of a bonding/association theory of adolescent drug use.Soc. Forces 65: 135–161.
Matsueda, R. L. (1982). Testing control theory and differential association: A causal modeling approach.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 489–504.
Matsueda, R. L. (1989). The dynamics of moral beliefs and minor deviance.Soc. Forces 68: 428–457.
Matsueda, R. L., and Heimer, K. (1987). Race, family structure, and delinquency: A test of differential association and social control theories.Am. Sociol. Rev. 52: 826–840.
Menard, S., and Elliott, D. S. (1990). Longitudinal and cross-sectional data collection and analysis in the study of crime and delinquency.Just. Q. 7: 11–55.
Menard, S., and Elliott, D. S. (1994). Delinquent bonding, moral beliefs, and illegal behaviors: A three-wave panel model.Just. Q. 11: 173–188.
Pisano, S., and Rooney, J. F. (1988). Children's changing attitudes regarding alcohol: A cross-sectional study.J. Drug Educ. 18: 1–11.
Reiss, A. J., Jr., and Rhodes, A. L. (1964). An empirical test of differential association theory.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 1: 5–18.
Short, J. F., Jr. (1957). Differential association and delinquency.Soc. Problems 4: 233–239.
Short, J. F., Jr. (1958). Differential association with delinquent friends and delinquent behavior.Pac. Sociol. Rev. 1: 20–25.
Short, J. F., Jr., and Strodtbeck, F. L. (1965).Group Process and Gang Delinquency, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Spear, S., and Akers, R. L. (1988). Social learning variables and the risk of habitual smoking among adolescents: The Muscatine study.Am. J. Prev. Med. 4: 336–348.
Stafford, M. C., and Ekland-Olson, S. (1982). On social learning and deviant behavior: A reappraisal of the findings.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 167–169.
Strickland, D. E. (1982). “Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory”: A comment and critique.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 162–167.
Sutherland, E. H. (1924).Criminology, Lippincott, Philadelphia.
Sutherland, E. H. (1934).Principles of Criminology, 2nd ed., Lippincott, Philadelphia.
Sutherland, E. H. (1939).Principles of Criminology, 3rd ed., Lippincott, Philadelphia.
Sutherland, E. H. (1947).Principles of Criminology, 4th ed., Lippincott, Philadelphia.
Sutherland, E. H. (1973).On Analyzing Crime, edited with an Introduction by Schuessler, K., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Sutherland, E. H.. and Cressey, D. R. (1970).Criminology, J. B. Lippincott, New York.
Sykes, G. M., and Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency.Am. Sociol. Rev. 22: 664–670.
Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M., and Jang, S. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory.Criminology 32: 47–83.
Tittle, C. R. (1985). The assumption that general theories are not possible. In Meier, R. F. (ed.).Theoretical Methods in Criminology, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 93–121.
Tittle, C. R., Burke, M. J., and Jackson, E. F. (1986). Modeling Sutherland's theory of differential association: Toward an empirical clarification.Soc. Forces 65: 405–432.
Turner, R. H., and Killian, L. M. (1987).Collective Behavior, Prentice-Hall, New York.
Warr, M., and Stafford, M. (1991). The influence of delinquent peers: What they think or what they do?Criminology 29: 851–866.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 1994 American Society of Criminology meetings in Miami, Florida.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reed, M.D., Rountree, P.W. Peer pressure and adolescent substance use. J Quant Criminol 13, 143–180 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221306
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221306