Summary
Cabbage plants were grown for 55 days with a nutrient solution containing 1 and 10 ppm of V, Cr(III), Cr(VI), Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, Hg(I), orHg(II). A comparison of the plant growth and chemical analysis revealed that Cr(VI), Cu, Cd, and Hg(II) in the solution are most toxic to the plant growth (hence detrimental to the cabbage-head formation) and Mn, Fe, and Zn are less toxic than other heavy metals, and that Mn, Zn, Co, Ni, and Cd and translocated into all the plant organs while V, Cr(III), Cr(VI), Fe, Cu, Hg(I), and Hg(II) are accumulated in the roots.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Chino, M. and Kitagishi K. 1966 Heavy metal toxicities in rice plants (Part 1). The growth of rice plants at high levels of copper, nickel, cobalt, zinc and manganese. J. Sci. Soil Manure37, 342–347.
Hara, T., Sonoda, Y. and Iwai, I. 1976 Growth response of cabbage plants to transition elements under water culture conditions. I. Titanium, vanadium, chromium, manganese, and iron. II. Cobalt, nickel, copper, zinc, and molybdenum. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.22, 307–315, 317–325.
Hatch, W. R. and Ott, W. L. 1968 Determination of sub-microgram quantities of mercury by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Anal. Chem.40, 2085–2087.
Osawa, T. and Ikeda, H. 1971 Heavy metal toxicities in vegetable crops. I. Effect of zinc concentration in nutrient solution on growth of vegetable crops. J. Japan Soc. Hort. Sci.40, 389–394.
Tanaka, A., Tadano, T. and Muto, K. 1975 Comparison of adaptability to heavy metals among crop plants (Part 2). Adaptability to zinc group metals. Studies on the comparative plant nutrition. J. Sci. Soil Manure46, 431–436.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hara, T., Sonoda, Y. Comparison of the toxicity of heavy metals to cabbage growth. Plant Soil 51, 127–133 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02205932
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02205932