Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of the descending thoracic aorta as an inflow source in aortoiliac reconstruction: Indications and long-term results

  • Papers from the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society
  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Bypass grafting from the descending thoracic aorta to the iliac or femoral artery is an underutilized procedure; fewer than 200 cases were reported in the past 30 years. Over the last decade we performed 32 bypasses to the femoral iliac or popliteal arteries using the descending thoracic aorta as the inflow source. In 19 (59%) patients the procedure was a primary aortic reconstruction, whereas in 13 (41%) it was secondary. The 30-day in-hospital mortality rate was 6.2%. Primary graft patency was 86% (±7.8) at 2 years. To obtain a meaningful long-term patency analysis, we combined our experience with that reported in the literature during the same period. Follow-up data were available in 146 patients in whom the mean follow-up time ranged from 15 to 53 months. The operation was a secondary aortic reconstruction in 84 (58%) patients and was a primary procedure in 62 (42%). Reasons for the selection of the descending thoracic aorta as the inflow source included previous abdominal aortic graft failure in 56 (38%) patients, abdominal aortic graft infection in 26 (18%), unfavorable abdominal conditions in 30 (21%), and miscellaneous causes in 34 (23%). The 30-day in-hospital mortality rate for the collective experience was 5.5%. Life-table analysis of the collective primary graft patency rate was 88.3% (±2.9) at 1 year, 81% (±4.3) at 3 years, and 72.7% (±8.5) at 6 years. Secondary graft patency for the collective experience was 93.1% (±2.3) at 1 year, 88.2% (±3.7) at 3 years, 82.7% (±7.3) at 6 years, and 82.7% (±10) at 8 years. Patient survival was 67.5% (±6.9) at 5 years and 55.4% (±9.9) at 7 years. These data suggest that bypass from the descending thoracic aorta to the iliac or femoral arteries offers low mortality and excellent durability and should be considered as the procedure of choice for secondary or extra-anatomic aortoiliac reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stevenson JK, Sauvage LR, Harkins HN. A bypass homograft from thoracic aorta to femoral arteries for occlusive vascular disease. Am Surg 1961;27:632–637.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blaisdell FW. Extraperitoneal thoracic aorta to femoral bypass. Am J Surg 1961;102:583–585.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robicsek F, McCall MM, Sanger PW, et al. Recurrent aneurysm of the abdominal aorta: Insertion of a vascular prosthesis from the distal aortic arch to the femoral arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 1967;3:549–552.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reichle FA, Tyson RR, Soloff LA, et al. Salmonellosis and aneurysm of the distal abdominal aorta: Case report with a review. Ann Surg 1970;171:219–228.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nunn DB, Kamal MA. Bypass grafting from the thoracic aorta to femoral arteries for high aortoiliac occlusive disease. Surgery 1972;72:749–755.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Froysaker T, Skagseth E, Dundas P, et al. Bypass procedures in the treatment of obstructions of the abdominal aorta. J Cardiovasc Surg 1973;14:317–321.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Finseth F, Abbot WM. One-stage operative therapy for salmonella mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Surg 1974;179:8–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jarrett F, Darling RC, Mundth ED, et al. Experience with infected aneurysms of the abdominal aorta. Arch Surg 1975;110:1281–1286.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cevese PG, Gallucci V. Thoracic aorto-to-femoral artery bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg 1975;16:432–438.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buxton B, Simpson L, Johnson N, et al. Descending thoracic aortofemoral bypass for distal aortic reconstruction after removal of an infected Dacron prosthesis. Med J Aust 1976;2:133–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lakner G, Lukacs L. High aortoiliac occlusion: Treatment with thoracic aorta to femoral arterial bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg 1983;4:532–534.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reilly LM, Ehrenfeld WK, Stoney RJ. Delayed aortic prosthetic reconstruction after removal of an infected graft. Am J Surg 1984;148:234–239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Enon B, Chevalier JM, Moreau P, et al. Revascularisation des membres inferieurs a partir de l'aorte thoracique descendante. J Chir 1985;122:539–543.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feldhaus RJ, Sterpetti AV, Schultz RD, et al. Thoracic aortafemoral artery bypass: Indications, technique, and late results. Ann Thorac Surg 1985;40:588–592.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haas KL, Moulder PV, Kerstein MD. Use of thoracic aortobifemoral artery bypass grafting as an alternative procedure for occlusive aortoiliac disease. Am Surg 1985;51:573–576.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DeLaurentis DA. The descending thoracic aorta in reoperative surgery. In Bergan JJ, Yao JST, eds. Reoperative Arterial Surgery. Orlando, Fla.: Grune & Stratton, 1986, pp 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hussain SA. Descending thoracic aorta to bifemoral bypass graft without laparotomy. Int Surg 1988;73:263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schellack J, Fulenwider JT, Smith RBI. Descending thoracic aortofemoral-femoral bypass: A remedial alternative for the failed aortobifemoral bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg 1988;29:201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bradham RR, Locklair PRJ, Grimball A. Descending thoracic aorta to femoral artery bypass. JSC Med Assoc 1989;85:283–286.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bowes DE, Youkey JR, Pharr WP, et al. Long-term follow-up of descending thoracic aorto-iliac/femoral bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg 1990;31:430–437.

    Google Scholar 

  21. O'Brien DP, Waldron RP, McCabe JP, et al. Descending thoracic aorto-bifemoral bypass graft: A safe alternative in the high risk patients. Ir Med J 1991;84:58–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kalman PG, Johnston KW, Walker PM. Descending thoracic aortofemoral bypass as an alternative for aortoiliac revascularization. J Cardiovasc Surg 1991;32:443–446.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Branchereau A, Magnan P-E, Moracchini P, et al. Use of descending thoracic aorta for lower limb revascularisation. Eur J Vasc 1992;255–262.

  24. Branchereau A. Personal communication, January 1993.

  25. McCarthy WJ, Mesh CL, McMillan WD, et al. Descending thoracic aorta-to-femoral artery bypass: Ten years' experience with a durable procedure. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:336–348.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Criado E, Keagy BA. Descending thoracic aorta to femoral artery bypass. Contemp Surg 1991;39:15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Criado E, Johnson GJ Jr, Burnham SJ, et al. Descending thoracic aorta-to-iliofemoral artery bypass as an alternative to aortoiliac reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 1992;15:550–557.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Anderson RP, Bonchek LI, Grunkemeier GL, et al. The analysis and presentation of surgical results by actuarial methods. J Surg Res 1974;16:224–230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fulenwider JT, Smith RB III, Johnson RW, et al. Reoperative abdominal arterial surgery —a ten-year experience. Surgery 1983;93:20–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bernhard VM, Ray LI, Towne JB. The reoperation of choice for aortofemoral graft occlusion. Surgery 1977;82:867–874.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brewster DC, Cooke JC. Longevity of aortofemoral bypass grafts. In Yao JST, Pearce WH, eds. Long-Term Results in Vascular Surgery. Norwalk, Conn.: Appleton & Lange, 1993, pp 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Blaisdell FW. Axillofemoral bypass: Long-term results. In Yao JST, Pearce WH, eds. Long-Term Results in Vascular Surgery. Norwalk, Conn.: Appleton & Lange, 1993, pp 395–399.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Frazier OH, Oalmann MC, Strong JP, et al. Clinical applications of the supraceliac aorta: Anatomical and pathologic observations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987;93:631–633.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Starrett RW, Stoney RJ. Juxtarenal aortic occlusion. Surgery 1974;76:890–897.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Reilly LM, Sauer L, Weinstein ES, et al. Infrarenal aortic occlusion: Does it threaten renal perfusion or function? J Vasc Surg 1990;11:216–225.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, N.C.

    Enrique Criado MD & Blair A. Keagy MD

Authors
  1. Enrique Criado MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Blair A. Keagy MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

We thank Professor Branchereau for providing us with his most recent data and Ivis Reed Bohlen for editorial assistance.

About this article

Cite this article

Criado, E., Keagy, B.A. Use of the descending thoracic aorta as an inflow source in aortoiliac reconstruction: Indications and long-term results. Annals of Vascular Surgery 8, 38–47 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02133404

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02133404

Keywords

Search

Navigation