Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond recruitment: Predictors of differential participation in a national antihunger organization

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

Surprisingly little research has sought to explain differential participation after recruitment into social movement organizations (SMOs). This study examines the influence of several sets of predictors on participation by members of a national organization in the antihunger movement. The findings highlight the importance of incentive, ideological, and microstructural factors for differential participation and suggest that favorable perceptions of SMOs also promote participation. Final remarks address the implications of the findings for the social movement and voluntary organization literatures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barling, Julian, Clive Fullagar, andE. Kevin Kelloway 1992 The Union and Its Members: A Psychological Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkan, Steven E., Steven F. Cohn, andWilliam H. Whitaker 1993 “Commitment across the miles: Ideological and microstructural sources of membership support in a national antihunger organization.” Social Problems 40:362–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacko, T. I. 1985 “Member participation in union activities: Perceptions of union priorities, performance, and satisfaction.” Journal of Labor Research 4:363–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Peter B., andJames Q. Wilson 1961 “Incentive systems: A theory of organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 6:129–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Steven F., Steven E. Barkan, andWilliam H. Whitaker 1993 “Activists against hunger: Membership characteristics of a national social movement organization.” Sociological Forum 8:113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, Don A. 1978 Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai 1975 A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organization. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, Myra Marx, andFrederick D. Miller 1985 “Mobilization and meaning: Toward an integration of social psychological and resource perspectives on social movements.” Sociological Inquiry 55:38–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosh, Patricia 1981 The Active Trade Unionist: A Study of Motivation and Participation at the Branch Level. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullagar, Clive, andJulian Barling 1989 “A longitudinal test of a model of the antecedents and consequences of union loyalty.” Journal of Applied Psychology 74:213–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William 1975 The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, Luther P., andVirginia H. Hine 1970 People, Power, and Change: Movements of Social Transformation. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. E., J. W. Philpot, R. E. Burt, C. A. Thompson, andW. E. Spiller 1980 “Commitment to the union: Development of a measure and an examination of its correlates.” Journal of Applied Psychology 65:747–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyman, M. M., andLamont E. Stallworth 1987 “Participation in local unions: A comparison of black and white members.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 40:323–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. Craig 1983 “Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 9:527–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, David C., andJack L. Walker, Jr. 1991 “The origins and maintenance of groups.” In Jack L. Walker, Jr. (ed.), Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements: 75–108. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, Bert 1984 “Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory.” American Sociological Review 49:583–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 “Union commitment: Replications and tests in the Dutch context.” Journal of Applied Psychology 74:869–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1993 “A theoretical framework for comparisons of social movement participation.” Sociological Forum 8:383–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, Bert, andDirk Oegema 1987 “Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements.” American Sociological Review 52:519–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, David 1981 “Commitment and detachment in voluntary organizations.” American Sociological Review 46:141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1988 “Incentives in collective action organizations.” American Sociological Review 53:311–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1990 Organizing for Collective Action: The Political Economies of Associations. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, David, andJames R. Wood 1981 Organized for Action: Commitment in Voluntary Associations. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornhauser, William 1959 The Politics of Mass Society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, John, andMichael Jamison 1984 “Social movement locals.” Sociological Analysis 45:115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, Theodore J. 1971 The Politics of Disorder. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug 1986 “Recruitment to high risk activism: The case of Freedom Summer.” American Journal of Sociology 92:64–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, andMayer N. Zald 1988 “Social movements.” In Neil J. Smelser (ed.), Handbook of Sociology: 695–737. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John D., andMayer N. Zald 1977 “Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82:1212–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, Andrew S. 1987 “Interest groups and theories of power in America.” British Journal of Political Science 17:129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, Clark, andDavid Miller 1973 “The assembling process: A theoretical and empirical examination.” American Sociological Review 38: 721–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, Lester W. 1965 Political Participation. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, Terry M. 1980 The Organization of Interests: Incentives and the Internal Dynamics of Political Interest Groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, Reinhold 1932 Moral Man and Immoral Society. New York: C. Scribner's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Pamela 1984 “‘If you don't do it, nobody else will‘: Active and token contributors to local collective action.” American Sociological Review 49:601–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur 1968 The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, Lawrence S. 1988 “Organizational maintenance and the retention decision in groups.” American Political Science Review 82:1129–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Paul S. 1971 “Prestige in the American occupational structure.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.

  • Staggenborg, Suzanne 1988 “The consequences of professionalization and formalization in the prochoice movement.” American Sociological Review 53:585–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, James W., Mitchell W. Fields, andLizabeth A. Barclay 1990 “Union commitment: An examination of antecedent and outcome factors.” Journal of Occupational Psychology 63:33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Edward J., andRex H. Warland 1983 “Social movement involvement in the wake of a nuclear accident: Activists and free riders in the TMI area.” American Sociological Review 48:764–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Kenneth, andAnthony M. Orum 1976 “Mobilizing people for collective political action.” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 4:187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiltfang, Gregory L., andDoug McAdam 1991 “The costs and risks of activism: A study of sanctuary movement activism.” Social Forces 69:987–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yablonsky, Lewis 1959 “The delinquent gang as a near group.” Social Problems 7:108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurcher, Louis A., andDavid A. Snow 1981 “Collective behavior: Social movements. In Morris Rosenberg and Ralph H. Turner (eds.), Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives: 447–482. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barkan, S.E., Cohn, S.F. & Whitaker, W.H. Beyond recruitment: Predictors of differential participation in a national antihunger organization. Sociol Forum 10, 113–134 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098566

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098566

Key words

Navigation