Abstract
PURPOSE: This study is designed to describe a technique and report results for treating low anastomotic sinuses. METHODS: Restorative proctocolectomy and complicated low anterior resections were protected with diverting loop ileostomy. Contrast enemas identified anastomotic problems before ileostomy closure. Pouch-anal or colorectal anastomotic sinuses that failed to resolve with observation were treated before intestinal continuity was restored. With the patient receiving regional or general anesthesia, a rigid proctoscope or anoscope was used to identify the sinus opening. The common wall between the sinus and the bowel lumen was divided under direct vision with laparoscopic cautery scissors, and the sinus cavity was debrided with a suction cautery wand placed through the scope. RESULTS: Six patients with anastomotic sinuses have received outpatient treatment in the described manner during the past two years. Four patients had restorative proctocolectomies for ulcerative colitis, and two had low anastomosis for rectal cancer. Three patients presented with pelvic sepsis before the contrast study; the remainder were asymptomatic. Division of anastomotic sinus was performed one to eight months after diagnosis of the sinus. Following division, anastomotic cavities resolved in five patients by 1 month and in one patient by 12 months. In these six patients, there was one dilatable anastomotic stricture but no other anastomotic complications at follow-up 5 to 16 (mean, 9.2) months after sinus division. CONCLUSION: When used in conjunction with fecal diversion, sinus unroofing by division of the common wall between the sinus and bowel lumen treats low pelvic sinuses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Korsgen S, Nikiteas N, Ogunbiyi OA, Keighley MR. Results from pouch salvage. Br J Surg 1996;83:372–4.
Tjandra JJ, Fazio VW. Complications of the ileoanal pouch. In: Mazier WP, Levein D, Luchtefeld M, Senagore A, eds. Surgery of the colon, rectum, and anus. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1995:894–9.
DeLaurier GA, Nelson H. Ileal pouch—anal anastomosis. In: Hicks TC, Beck DE, Opelka FG, Timmcke AE, eds. Complications of colon and rectal surgery. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. 1996:339–56.
Poppen B, Svenberg T, Bark T,et al. Colectomyproctomucosectomy with S-pouch: operative procedures, complications, and functional outcome in 69 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:40–7.
Beart RW. Ulcerative colitis: complications of pelvic pouch. In: Fazio VW, ed. Current therapy in colon and rectal surgery. Toronto: BC Decker, 1990:180–2.
Lindquist K, Nilsell K, Liljeqvist L. Cuff abscesses and ileoanal anastomotic separations in pelvic pouch surgery: an analysis of possible etiologic factors. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:355–9.
Tsao JI, Galandiuk S, Pemberton JH. Pouchogram: predictor of clinical outcome following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:547–51.
Malcolm PN, Bhagat KK, Chapman MA, Davies SG, Williams NS, Murfitt JB. Complications of the ileal pouch: is the pouchogram a useful predictor? Clin Radiol 1995;50:613–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Whitlow, C.B., Opelka, F.G., Gathright, J.B. et al. Treatment of colorectal and ileoanal anastomotic sinuses. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 760–763 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055427
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055427