Skip to main content
Log in

Restorative proctocolectomy in patients older than fifty years

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to compare functional results, complications, preoperative durations of disease, and rates of dysplasia and neoplasia between older and younger chronic ulcerative colitis patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with mucosectomy. METHODS: A total of 392 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of chronic ulcerative colitis underwent elective RPC with mucosection and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis. Pathologic reports were reviewed, with specific reference to findings of dysplasia or cancer. Functional results concerning the number of bowel movements per 24 hour period and the incidence of fecal soilage were obtained by direct or telephone patient interview. FINDINGS: Group I consisted of 326 patients aged 5 to 49 (mean, 30.9) years and 160 women. Group II comprised 66 patients aged 50 to 74 (mean, 56.9) years and 29 women. Duration of disease was significantly longer in the older group (6.2 vs. 15.6 years;P <0.001). The older group had significantly higher rates of dysplasia (29/326 vs. 19/66;P <0.0001) and malignancy (14/326 vs. 9/66;P =0.003). Rates of complication, hospital days following RPC, and total hospital days for all causes were comparable between groups. Perfect daytime continence was observed in 81.6 percent of Group I and 80 percent of Group II patients (213/261 vs. 40/50;P = 0.79). Perfect continence during sleep was observed in 65.1 percent of Group I and 62 percent of Group II patients (170/261 vs. 31/50;P =0.67). Mean number of bowel movements per 24 hour period for Group I was 6.3±0.2 and for Group II was 7.4±0.5. Mean difference, one movement per 24 hours, was not significant (95 percent confidence interval, −0.02 to 2.1;t =1.95,P =0.055). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that patients older than 50 years are suitable candidates for RPC with mucosectomy. Functional results and complication rates are similar to those observed among younger patients. Patients older than 50 years have a significantly higher rate of concurrent dysplasia and malignant degeneration than younger patients, most probably because of a longer duration of disease. RPC with mucosal excision potentially lowers this risk by elimination of all colorectal mucosa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Metcalf AM, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Beart RW Jr, Wolff BG. Ileal “J” pouch-anal anastomosis: clinical outcome. Ann Surg 1985;202:735–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Church JM. The ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in challenging patients: stretching the limits. Aust N 2 J Surg 1995;65:104–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis WG, Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ, Axon AT, Johnston D. Restorative proctocolectomy with end to end pouch-anal anastomosis in patients over the age of fifty. Gut 1993;34:948–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jorge JM, Wexner SD, James K, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Recovery of anal sphincter function after the ileoanal reservoir procedure in patients over the age of fifty. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1002–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ohman U. Colorectal carcinoma in patients with ulcerative colitis. Am J Surg 1982;144:344–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson WR, McDermott FT, Hughes ES, Pihl EA, Milne BJ, Price AB. Carcinoma of the colon and rectum in inflammatory disease of the intestine. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983;156:193–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson WR, McDermott FT, Pihl E, Hughes ES. Mucosal dysplasia: a major predictor of cancer following ileorectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:697–700.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Perry TG, Strong SA, Fazio VW,et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: is it ever too late? [meeting abstract]. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:P14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reissman P, Piccirillo M, Ulrich A, Daniel N, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Functional results of the double-stapled ileoanal reservoir. J Am Coll Surg 1995;181:444–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilchrist KW, Harms BA, Starling JR. Abnormal rectal mucosa of the anal transitional zone in ulcerative colitis. Arch Surg 1995;130:981–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. King DW, Lubowski DZ, Cook TA. Anal canal mucosa in restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 1989;76:970–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsunoda A, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ. Incidence of dysplasia in the anorectal mucosa in patients having restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1990;77:506–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ziv Y, Fazio VW, Sirimarco MT, Lavery IC, Goldblum JR, Petras RE. Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of dysplasia in the anal transitional zone after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1281–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996, and at the Tripartite Meeting, London, United Kingdom, July 8 to 10, 1996.

About this article

Cite this article

Bauer, J.J., Gorfine, S.R., Gelernt, I.M. et al. Restorative proctocolectomy in patients older than fifty years. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 562–565 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055379

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055379

Key words

Navigation