Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to visualize supposed defects of the internal anal sphincter after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) by anal endosonography and to relate these findings with anal manometry and fecal continence. METHODS: We investigated 23 patients, visualized the sphincter complex by anal endosonography, and quantified the anatomic changes of the sphincter. Anal resting and squeezing pressures as well as length of the anal canal were determined by anal manometry. Continence was objectively scored by an observer not involved in treatment of patients and subjectively by patients themselves. RESULTS: At anal endosonography, the mean thickness of the internal anal sphincter was 1.16 mm (95 percent confidence interval, 0.98–1.33), which is significantly less than in normal volunteers. Tapering of the internal anal sphincter only occurred in six patients (of whom two had a gap in the internal sphincter). In 17 patients endosonography showed a thin internal anal sphincter without essential variation in thickness over the complete circumference. Approximately eight weeks after ileostomy closure following IPAA, maximum resting pressure (MRP) and length of the anal canal appeared to be significantly decreased compared with values before IPAA (P=0.001 and 0.002, respectively). These differences were less striking (P=0.05 and 0.04, respectively) when measured six or more months after ileostomy closure,. The extent of reduction of the MRP and thickness of the internal anal sphincter were not correlated with grade of continence or with subjectively scored continence. CONCLUSIONS: IPAA leads to a reduction of thickness of the internal anal sphincter and reduction of the MRP. Tapering or gaps in the internal anal sphincter are probably caused by direct trauma to this sphincter because of mucosectomy, whereas in cases of circular reduction of thickness of the internal anal sphincter without tapering or gaps, direct trauma is an unlikely explanation; this reduction is probably caused by denervation. IPAA compromises continence to a variable degree in 18 of 23 patients. No correlations were found between the extent of reduction of the MRP and the extent of reduction in internal anal sphincter thickness or between these two parameters and objectively or subjectively scored continence. Difficulties in obtaining reliable information on continence may be a causal factor. A striking discrepancy was noticed among objective, scored disturbances in continence, and overall satisfaction concerning level of continence by patients themselves.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Grotz RL, Pemberton JH. The ileal pouch operation for ulcerative colitis. Surg Clin North Am 1993;73:909–32.
Wettergren A, Gyrtrup HJ, Grossman E,et al. Complications after J-pouch ileoanal anastomosis: stapled compared with handsewn anastomosis. Eur J Surg 1993;159:121–4.
Kelly KA, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Dozois RR. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Curr Probl Surg 1992;29:59–131.
Seow-Choen F, Tsunoda A, Nicholls RJ. Prospective randomized trial comparing anal function after hand sewn ileoanal anastomosis with mucosectomyversus stapled ileoanal anastomosis without mucosectomy in restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1991;78:430–4.
Keighley MR, Grobler S, Bain I. An audit of restorative proctocolectomy. Gut 1993;34:680–4.
Öresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Hultén L. The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy: a prospective study in 100 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:50–6.
Lavery IC, Tuckson WB, Easley KA. Internal anal sphincter function after total abdominal colectomy and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without mucosal proctectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:950–3.
McHugh SM, Diamant NE, McLeod R, Cohen Z. S-pouches vs. J-pouches: a comparison of functional outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:671–7.
Williams NS, Marzouk DE, Hallan RI, Waldron DJ. Function after ileal pouch and stapled pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 1989;76:1168–71.
Johnston D, Holdsworth PJ, Nasmyth DG,et al. Preservation of the entire anal canal in conservative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a pilot study comparing end-to-end ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal resection with mucosal proctectomy and endo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1987;74:940–4.
Delemarre JB, Gooszen HG, Kruyt RH, Soebhag R, Maas-Geesteranus A. The effect of posterior rectopexy on fecal continence: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:311–6.
Miller R, Bartolo DC, Locke-Edmunds JC, Mortensen NJ. Prospective study of conservative and operative treatment for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1988;75:101–5.
Tuckson W, Lavery I, Fazio V, Oakley J, Church J, Milsom J. Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation. Am J Surg 1991;161:90–6.
Orkin BA, Soper NJ, Kelly KA, Dent J. Influence of sleep on anal sphincteric pressure in health and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:137–44.
Stryker SJ, Kelly KA, Phillips SF, Dozois RR, Beart RW Jr. Anal and neorectal function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1986;203:55–61.
Rabau MY, Percy JP, Parks AG. Ileal pelvic reservoir: a correlation between motor patterns and clinical behaviour. Br J Surg 1982;69:391–5.
Stryker SJ, Borody TJ, Phillips SF, Kelly KA, Dozois RR, Beart RW Jr. Motility of the small intestine after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1985;201:351–6.
Becker JM, McGrath KM, Meagher MP, Parodi JE, Dunnegan DA, Soper NJ. Late functional adaptation after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Surgery 1991;110:718–25.
Burnett SJ, Bartram CI. Endosonographic variations in the normal internal anal sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991;6:2–4.
Bachmann Nielsen M, Pedersen JF, Hauge C, Rasmussen O, Christiansen J. Endosonography of the anal sphincter: findings in healthy volunteers. AJR 1991;157:1199–202.
Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1991;78:312–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Read at the meeting of The Association of Surgeons of The Netherlands, Veldhoven, The Netherlands, June 2 to 3, 1994.
About this article
Cite this article
Silvis, R., van Eekelen, J.W., Delemarre, J.B.V.M. et al. Endosonography of the anal sphincter after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 38, 383–388 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054226
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054226