Abstract
PURPOSE: Patients with intractable fecal incontinence, in whom all other treatment failed, can be treated by dynamic graciloplasty. Good results have been reported, but this technique involves specific problems. All problems that occurred over an eight-year period are presented, and management is discussed. METHODS: Dynamic graciloplasty was performed in 67 patients with a mean follow-up of 2.7 years. All patients were monitored by physical examination, anal manometry, defecography, and electromyography at fixed intervals. All complications were noted and treated. Continence was defined as being continent to solid and liquid stools. RESULTS: The technique was successful in 52 patients (78 percent), whereas failures occurred in 15 patients (22 percent). Complications resulted from technical problems, problems with infection, and problems attributable to an abnormal physiology of the muscle or an anorectal functional imbalance, In total, 53 complications were identified in 36 patients. Most technical problems, concerning the transposition and stimulation of the gracilis muscle, could be treated. Failures were attributable to a bad contraction of the distal part of the muscle (n=4) and perforation of the anal canal during stimulation (n=1). In eight patients, infection of the stimulator and leads required explantation. Three patients did not regain continence after reimplantation. Apart from moderate constipation, physiologic complications were very hard to treat and resulted in failures in five patients because of overflow incontinence, soiling, a nondistending rectum, strong peristalsis, and strong constipation. In two patients, the technique failed despite a well-contracting graciloplasty; no clear reason for the failure was found. CONCLUSION: Complications associated with the technique of dynamic graciloplasty such as loss of contraction, infection, bad contraction in the distal part of the muscle, and constipation can often be prevented or treated. Difficulties related to an impaired sensation and/or motility, attributable to a congenital cause or degeneration, are impossible to treat, and this signifies that a good selection of patients is essential to prevent disappointment.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Clinical and manometric assessment of gracilis muscle transplant for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:767–9.
Pickrell KL, Broadbent TR, Masters FW, Metzger JT. Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle. Ann Surg 1952;135:853–62.
Pette D, Vrbova G. Adaptation of mammalian skeletal muscle fibers to chronic electrical stimulation. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 1992;120:115–202.
Baeten CG, Konsten J, Spaans F,et al. Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 1991;338:1163–5.
Williams NS, Patel J, George BD, Hallan RI, Watkins ES. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 1991;338:1166–9.
Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM,et al. Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1600–5.
Konsten J, Baeten CG, Spaans F, Havenith MG, Soeters PB. Follow-up of anal dynamic graciloplasty for fecal continence. World J Surg 1993;17:404–8.
Gonzalez AP, Teoh TA, Wexner SD,et al. The stimulated gracilis neosphincter operation: initial experience, pitfalls and complications [meeting abstract]. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:P19.
Williams PE, Goldspink G. Changes in sarcomere length and physiological properties in immobilized muscle. J Anat 1978;127:459–68.
Cavina E, Seccia M, Evangelista G. Perineal colostomy and electrostimulated gracilis “neosphincter” after abdomino-perineal resection of the colon and anorectum: a surgical experience and follow-up study in 47 cases [comments], Int J Colorectal Dis 1990;5:6–11.
Rosen HR, Feil W, Novi G, Zoch G, Dahlberg S, Schiessel R. The electrically stimulated (dynamic) graciloplasty for faecal incontinence—first experiences with a modified muscle sling. Int J Colorectal Dis 1994;9:184–6.
Goligher JC, Hughes ES. Sensibility of the rectum and the colon. Lancet 1951;1:543–8.
Bielefeldt K, Enck P, Erckenbrecht JF. Sensory and motor function in the maintenance of anal continence. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:674–8.
Rogers J, Henry MM, Misiewcz JJ. Combined sensory and motor deficit in primary neuropathic faecal incontinence. Gut 1988;29:5–9.
Moore TC. Advantages of performing the saggital anoplasty operation for imperforate anus at birth. J Pediatr Surg 1990;25:276–7.
Versluis PJ, Konsten J, Geerdes B, Baeten CG, Oei KT. Defecographic evaluation of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:468–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by the Funds for Development in Medicine (Ministry of Health), the Department of Trade and Industry of the Netherlands, and Maastricht University Hospital.
Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.
No reprints are available.
About this article
Cite this article
Geerdes, B.P., Heineman, E., Konsten, J. et al. Dynamic graciloplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 39, 912–917 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053991
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053991